8 July 2024

Safe injecting rooms back on the agenda, 25 years after they were first proposed

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
15
Chris Gough

CAHMA executive director Chris Gough is encouraged by developments on the long-promised safe injecting room. Photo: Mitch Lamb, CAHMA.

ACT Greens MLA and Minister for Population Health Emma Davidson says a supervised injecting room could be opened in Canberra in the next term of government after announcing it would be considered as part of a new review into drug harm reduction in the ACT.

Supervised injecting rooms are places where drug users can inject illicit substances under the watchful eye of health professionals.

The ACT Legislative Assembly first passed a law in 1999 outlining a plan for the trial of a facility in Civic, but opposition and constant delays meant this never eventuated.

Since then, medically supervised injecting facilities have been set up in Kings Cross in Sydney (in 2001) and Richmond in Melbourne (2018).

“The best time to put this in place was 30 years ago; the second best time is now,” Ms Davidson said.

READ ALSO ACT Government confirms investigation of Guardian Childcare over alleged law breaches

A 2021 review by The Burnett Institute concluded a safe injecting room is feasible in the ACT.

“This [new upcoming] review is not to tell whether a safe injecting room is feasible. We know that it is already. It’s to tell us how to do it right,” Ms Davidson said.

She said the ACT Health Directorate review will be commissioned this month (July), will be conducted by an expert in the field and is expected to be handed to the newly elected Legislative Assembly in December 2024.

The announcement was welcomed by Chris Gough, executive director of the Canberra Alliance for Harm Minimisation & Advocacy (CAHMA)

“CAHMA has been pushing for this for a long time, so it’s good to see there will be a review,” he said.

“We need to be brave and just do it. It’s not that hard. I’m frustrated that it’s taken so long. The safe injecting model we had in the 1990s was the leader in Australia. But here we are three decades later, still spinning our wheels.”

Woman speaking into microphone

Emma Davidson MLA wants this issue to progress quickly. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Mr Gough said this review was needed as the safe injecting rooms in Sydney and Melbourne are different from what’s needed in Canberra.

“In Richmond, you have public injecting that is visual and street-based, and the public can see the harm.

“In the ACT, we don’t have that, but what the recent 2021 feasibility review study showed is, although it isn’t as visible, we have the same level of harm happening in our community and therefore the same need.”

READ ALSO Almost half of Australia’s EV owners want their ICE cars back, report says. Or do they?

Mr Gough said there was a potential for Canberra to have the best model for Australia.

“In Sydney, they open the doors in the morning and they get up to 200 people coming through and injecting. That’s all they have time for –injecting and keeping people alive.

“In the ACT, we would have far fewer people coming through the door because of our population size. We’d have more ability to properly connect them with wrap-around care.

“We are advocating for a nurse and peer-led model, which is integrated into the existing health system, where nurses would connect people with doctors and other health services and peer support workers would help people engage and navigate those health and social services and provide ongoing support.

Ms Davidson said the review would consider the best location for a centre and whether it would be co-located with other services, such as the established pill testing facility on Moore Street in Civic.

Mr Gough said there were advantages and disadvantages of doing so.

“On the one hand, you can share resources and expertise, but on the other hand, young people who are using ecstasy on a weekend may not want to go through the front door of a safe injecting room,” he said.

He added that a “not in my backyard” attitude by Canberra residents and businesses has also delayed the establishment of safe injecting rooms.

Join the conversation

15
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Also, Mr Gough might need to go outside occasionally. There is definitely public injecting that is visible and street based here. Go take a walk down some of the alleyways in civic, or watch 4 junkies go into one of the robotoilets in civic. That’s pretty visible and street based. And it happens all day every day.

He should be forced to move in next door to any injecting room as well. If you think it’s a great idea, suffer its consequences.

Thought the whole idea was to help society ween itself off drugs entirely. This is about as effective an initiative as allowing people to abuse their partners in a controlled environment in order to bring down rates of domestic violence in the country.

Man-Bloviating Endlessly12:20 am 12 Jul 24

No the idea of an injecting room is harm minimisation. Harm minimisation as the name suggests, does not have weaning people off drugs as one of its objectives, its about minimising the harm to not only themselves but to the community which is what this aims to scheme.

Open it next door to Emma Davidsons house and legislate that she can’t move out while it’s in operation. Surely if it is such a good idea, she won’t object.

GrumpyGrandpa6:26 pm 08 Jul 24

I oppose Injecting rooms, because I fear that they legitimise the use of drugs.

Why am I not surprised that the review would be completed in December; after the Territory election?

If the government was serious about Injecting rooms, this is how it should be done:
1. The government would supply the drugs (for free or at minimal cost). The substance being injected would be known AND importantly, we’d be taking the money out of the drug trade. No drug money; no drug crime!
2. Injection clinics would be located at our hospitals, so that medical assistance would be available, if required.
3. Rehabilitation would need to be the end objective.

Man-Bloviating Endlessly12:29 am 12 Jul 24

I actually worked with the authors of the initial recommendation all those years ago. Its main participants then were
Likely to be heroin users. Having the heroin prescribed was seen then as part of the solution, as were your other suggestions. Your proposal has many merits and avoids any unnecessary emotional objections, focussing purely on the best solution to the problem.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.