Skip to content Skip to main navigation


We'll switch your business
to Led lighting for Free*

Sign wars

By johnboy - 13 April 2007 23

[First filed: April 10, 2007 @ 12:22
Second filing: April 11, 2007 @ 12:50]

Steve Pratt has blown a gasket and there’s boilling fluids all over the place as he kicks his feet and fists against the ground about “orange coloured signs” (too scared to even give oxygen to the dreaded initals “IR” it seems) popping up around the city. He’s also not happy about graffiti and is trying to conflate it with political speech where it suits him.

“The Stanhope Government, of course, is prepared to ignore community concern about such signs blighting our landscape, particularly when they have been erected by unions and political groups in ideological alignment with Mr Stanhope and spruiking political messages which Mr Stanhope and Mr Hargreaves constantly spruik. Coincidence or by government design??

“Community groups are prohibited from erecting signs on light poles even for noble community causes. But Mr Stanhope’s and Mr Hargreave’s political mates certainly can do so with impunity and Messrs Stanhope and Hargreaves ensure they remain erected for months,” Mr Pratt said.

Nothing to stop Steve getting out there and removing the illegal signs himself is there?

(And has he spoken to Troy?)

UPDATED: Steve appears to have been reading and has announced that he will be tearing down rogue signage if the Government fails to meet his ultimatum no less (COB Friday the 13th of April). Steve’s roadside discussions about the merits of their posters with burly CFMEU members will be a highlight of the year we imagine.

ANOTHER UPDATE: He’s going for it! And he’s even published a schedule:

“– The junction of Justinian Street and Yamba Drive, Woden Town Centre, on the bridge leading into the Woden cemetery, at 10:30 am

— At the junction of Dorsch Street and Yamba Drive, Isaacs at 11:30 am, and then

— Along Yamba/ Erindale Drive in the vicinity of the junction Sulwood Drive at Wanniassa.

I won’t be able to make it but if anyone wants to take pictures and report on the event it would be much appreciated.

What’s Your opinion?

Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
23 Responses to
Sign wars
Spectra 7:57 pm 11 Apr 07

We’re getting a fair bit off topic here, so feel free to tell me to shut up whenever 🙂
Notionally, they’re meant to do for the ACT whatever they can within the scope of federal politics. For example Kate Lundy, has in the past lobbied very heavily for broadband access in Gungahlin, while Gazza seems to have been responsible for saving ScreenSound from being messed with. Of course, as members of the major parties, they can’t really step too far from the party line – Gazza was pretty meek in his protestations about the gay marriage legislation being overridden, for example (he made some noises, but wouldn’t go as far as crossing the floor if I recall correctly).

seepi 6:18 pm 11 Apr 07

That’s the Feds as a whole, but what do Bob McMullan and Gary Humphries actually do for the ACT, as opposed to for the country/the liberal party policy?

Or aren’t they meant to – it is just us getting our input into National affairs.

Spectra 5:39 pm 11 Apr 07

seepi: Actually, strictly speaking, they can. Unlike the states, the territory government derives its power from an act of federal parliament. If they felt the urge, they could legislate the territory government out of existence and take control of all these matters themselves. Not that it seems especially likely – they prefer to intervene only when it suits their conservative moral agenda (say, when local government tries to legislate for equality for gay couples). Which is one of several reasons Troy won’t be getting my vote – sorry Troy, you seem like a decent enough guy, but I can’t bring myself to vote for candidate representing the current federal government.

West_Kambah_4eva 4:14 pm 11 Apr 07

Maelinar – I think you’ve hit the nail on the head with the ‘major issue, minor issue’ tact you’ve taken. It’s actually expressed very simply what’s been wrong with Canberra for so long. We need some sane city development – complete objective and separate from the fact that we are the national capital. We have ENOUGH monuments. NOBODY CARES ABOUT THEM ANYMORE. Fix the roads, improve the public transport, introduce a sane legal system, cut the rents, and more actual city culture (ps Al Grassby statues != culture) and I’ll be happy.

ps, I noted this in the Cafe thread comments, but it, and the blog, got a story in the weekend CT. In the middle somewhere, on the right a small column on the Riotact blog just saying how everyone thinks Tilley’s has bad service, etc. FYI.

seepi 2:34 pm 11 Apr 07

What exactly can Federal MPs do for Canberra citizens?
They can’t fix the roads, hospitals or policing issues or get involved in stuff like the dragway or school closures.
So what do they do apart from vote on new laws?

Maelinar 1:39 pm 11 Apr 07

Re the update: Friday the 13th is probably not a good day to be going into the middle of a dual carriageway whatever your intentions.

Good luck Mr Prat.

Nik_the_Pig 9:53 am 11 Apr 07

Maelinar, we will not be doing email interviews untill it’s MUCH closer to the election but we too will keen to see who responds as much as what they have to sey.

Maelinar 8:45 am 11 Apr 07

G’day back Troy,

My apologies for your misunderstanding; my reasonable guy comment was intended to be more of a surprised nature than an insult.

Aiming towards a nutshell history, I’ve often been critical of the Liberals in Canberra, particularly at their own infighting hampering any decent policy effort. I’ve often noted that a party elects itself out of government more than voters electing it in – I’m sure as an experienced politician you’ve heard commentary along those lines in the past.

This is not to say that I’m a single party complainant – I still feel that Deb Foskey of the Greens should stand down from her position after being exposed as a leech on the public housing department, and have had various things to say about their greens policies being more socialist than environmental in recent years. I suppose that’s about the company they keep more than anything.

Then we move to Labour. I don’t think it’s a good idea to be in a deficit in the middle of a drought and decide to build an Arboretum. Nor do I think statues and memorials of various media issues/personalities an appropriate taxpayer value for dollar.

S7S appears to control the width and length of housing in Canberra, but the NCA controls the height. I’m not happy that the roles of the two organisations have not been deliberated further.

Emperor Nero spends more time on humanitarian issues than Tim Costello. International bill of human rights and SIEV X memorials are minor issues, not major ones. Potholes in my street is a major issue, not a minor one.

The whomacrats ?

I drive home and I notice blocked drainways, uncut verges, and see trees that need pruning.

I would like to see a train system servicing the sattelite towns into Civic – since there’s no parking left it’s pointless driving anyway. I’d also like to see a monorail around LBG and the sightseeing circuit but I’m more than aware of the long term nature of these issues.

I’d also like to see any future roads in Canberra to have a specified design rules; dual lane roundabouts that don’t end until at least 50metres after the roundabout, wider width roads, and major infrastructure roads being built before the suburbian construction begins.

I’d like to not have to pay to go to the hospital, nor would I like to pay to drop my rubbish at the tip, on account of they’re going to make money off what I deliver them anyway.

As an ACTSES volunteer I’d like to feel more supported by my government when I’m on the top of a wet roof in the middle of a storm.

I’d like to see the criminal element of Canberra get more reasonable sentences, and I’m willing to have the capacity to hold them, rather than send them interstate to Goulburn etc.

I’d also like to water my gardens and take long showers. I’m completely aware that the revenues from the contracts onselling the water rights go back to the public purse, but what is a Government that cannot supply the most basic of commodities to it’s taxpayers ?

Finally, I’m a voter. I’m in your electorate, and I’ll give you a go. As I said earlier, I’m surprised, but given the evidence in front of me and the lack of any competition to sway a reasonable vote, I’ll vote for you.

Just stop selling everything, but that’s a federal Liberal issue. It’s the thing keeping the budget in surplus is obvious, but when they are gone, they are gone.

As a voter, my concerns are above. I don’t expect any answers, nor do I believe that the Government of the day needs to necessarily pay for these. They’re just out there as my concerns.

I’ll wait for the 10 questions NTP hinted at to seek your thoughts.

Nik_the_Pig 7:50 am 11 Apr 07

Seat Status: Safe Labor
Two Party Preferred: LP: 36.67% ALP: 63.33%

Best of luck being a Liberal going for a Federal seat in Canberra. Seems like a lot of work for VERY little chance of reward (which could be another point in your favour – doesn’t seem you’re in it for the reward). With the upcoming Rudd era of politics I think no matter how good your campaign you’ll be lucky to make any real headway into that 26% swing you’ll need.

I look forward to the Riot email interview with you (and all the other candidates) closer to the election.

TroyWilliams 5:42 pm 10 Apr 07

G’day Maelinar

I’ve been called a lot worse that a ‘reasonable guy’ in the past month. All part of the rough’n’tumble of politics I guess.

I’m the candidate for the seat of Fraser in this year’s federal election. For information visit the ABOUT FRASER page on my website.

All the best


Maelinar 4:17 pm 10 Apr 07

what electorate is Troy representing anyway ?

for a liberal he sounds like a reasonable guy.

louise 2:16 pm 10 Apr 07

Just more free advertising for Troy Williams.

CanberraGreen 1:14 pm 10 Apr 07

One rule for Stanhope’s union mates and another for Troy Williams????

LG 1:06 pm 10 Apr 07

valid point though – why one rule for one sector of the community and one for the other?

louise 12:56 pm 10 Apr 07

I thought this dummy spit was just as much fun. I didn’t know the ACT government belongs to ALGA. Goes to show they reallt should be a local council.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | |

Search across the site