Skip to content Skip to main navigation


We mean business
Contact us today to get results

Stage Two Restrictions Forever?

By johnboy - 9 August 2005 38

The Chief Minister has put out a media release on his visit to new works at Googong. Apparently they can now move water out of Cotter, into Googong, and from thence to us. One wonders what has happened to the millions spent to be able to pump directly from Cotter?

ABC Online has more on this and it would seem that while we won’t be forced into Stage 3 this summer we’ll be stuck on Stage 2 pretty much forever until we run out in 2023 (bearing in mind it’ll take 20 years to build a new damn and it’s 2005 already). As Mr Stanhope only plans to win “a further four years beyond” the next election I suppose that makes it someone else’s problem

The Chief Minister seems to relish telling us how to flush our own toilets for the next 7 years, rather than setting a sustainable price and letting us make up our own silly minds.

What’s Your opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
38 Responses to
Stage Two Restrictions Forever?
Showing only Website comments
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Maelinar 12:46 pm 12 Aug 05

well it’s not a dam until it fills with water, but who’s to say that driving around in your bulldozer is something that you do for fun and look at the result !?!

Ari 12:31 pm 12 Aug 05

You may very well suggest that, Maelinar, I couldn’t possibly comment.

It’s amazing how you can “accidentally” throw up a farm dam while moving a bulldozer around the property.

Maelinar 12:22 pm 12 Aug 05

My advice that you can pass onto them from me is that forgiveness is easier to ask for than permission…

Just as long as they just do it and don’t make a fuss about it, nobody will ever know (except us)

If you do get caught, it was either always there, or sorry, didn’t realise.

Ari 11:27 am 12 Aug 05

There are plenty of farmers who have the shits about water management and wastage in rural areas, too.

I’ve got plenty of mates who farm on the Northern Tablelands and they are not allowed to put in dams on their own properties to drought-proof them.

The reason? The Department of Water Resources (or CALM or whatever it’s called at the moment) needs the water to flow off their properties into a few huge dams (Pindari and Copeton for example) that were built solely to feed cotton out at Moree.

So a hard-working bloke (or blokette) trying to grow sheep or cattle on the family property can’t make the best use of the land as a few huge agribusiness have the political clout to steal the water.

Maelinar 11:03 am 12 Aug 05

Essense. You are nearly on the right track. Nearly.

I attend regular meetings where we discuss how to assist farmers manage TERRAlitres of water that they are mismanaging.

And my issue is that the government is getting up my back about not using the half flush button on my toilet.

What part of that statement don’t you get ?

Terralitres opposed to half a bloody litre of water.

We’re bending over backwards to assist people who are out in unsustainable land, doing unsustainable practices, I’d love to be afforded that same security for any prospective business I decided to get into.

And before you get into the ‘doing it hard’ routine, we’ve now been in over 10 years of drought. To say that you don’t know how to handle a drought after all this time is like telling the world that you are a government sponsored idiot. Unfortunately that is the general gist of what I’m seeing in farming practices in this country.

Before you get into pulling apart that paragraph, be prepared to explain the fact that the water situation has not changed in the last 10 years, in regard to avaliability levels, except consumption has exorbitantly gone into production of cotton etcetera into said unsustainable regions.

I believe that the Government is to blame for the situation, responsibility lied directly with them to manage the water, which they didn’t do.

They have tried to pull the wool over our eyes by informing us quite politely that us town folk are consuming way too much water, and to flush less, not wash our cars, gardens etc. All the while the silent front have been abusing terralitres and laughing themselves silly.

Farmers get quite uppity at townspeople when they see this stuff on the telly, I don’t blame them, since their IQ generally leaves them (and I’m talking steryiotypically) amoung the crowd that believe everything they see on TV, so in their opinion they are seeing townspeople wasting water when their crops are going dry since they have only watered them 3 times this week – at a consumption rate that would frighten even you.

The CSIRO has recently published a paper that indicates where the real consumption levels in Australia are, the liability being directly upon producers and light industry. I note that still, after more than 2 months since it’s release, Government literature and propoganda is still informing me, the ordinary householder, that I am the nasty waster of the most precious resource.

And before you go into a hard done by speel about how the farmers are doing it tough, please remember that I am paying my taxes. So does my neighbours, and all the people living in my high density street. Our taxes are what’s driving this exercise in headbutting brick walls, and I’m not pleased about it one bit.

I know of farmers out there who are doing the right thing, they don’t have their hand out at all. This isn’t directed at them.

I just have a bee up my ass about the whingers who couldn’t run a farm if they had old macdonald as an advisor, getting up and telling me how hard they are having it, when in reality they have been mooching off me for the last decade.

johnboy 12:15 am 12 Aug 05

I’m saying that outside of a real crisis leave people alone to do what they want to do.

and at $1.53 per thousand litres it can’t be described as a crisis. or even a shortage.

the ACT Government doesn’t even metre their own usage last I heard as an indication of how much they really care.

So all we’re left with is an exercise in control which lovers of native horticulture use as a reason for a lecture.

personally i have an ambition to never own a lawnmower so I’m cool with it.

doesn’t mean i want to tell other people how they live.

The Es-Sense 12:09 am 12 Aug 05

OK, I give up! If people think their suburban life turns from awesome to terrible if the evil empire dictates to wash their car using a bucket and restricts sprinkler usage of 6 hours a day, turning them into a traumatised mob that has to make up shower and tooth-brushing rules so they can have a better whinge – then maybe water restrictions should just be lifted, so everyone can have a sound sleep. I definately will now.

johnboy 11:41 pm 11 Aug 05

The price for farmers in irrigation areas is even lower.

which is why they can grow rice and coton and bugger the environment.

you’re talking about distribution problems, not shortages.

you might also note that domestic water use is a puny fraction of total water use in this nation.

So again perhaps better to see those farmers being under-billed for what they get before dictating the layout of everyone’s garden and leisure activities?

The Es-Sense 11:24 pm 11 Aug 05

Johnboy: Your argument makes perfect sense – with the premise of “The value of water is bugger all”. However, I would suspect that 99 percent of Aussie farmers (among others) might disagree. Anyway…Before I go to bed, I’ll just turn the tap on and leave it running until 7 am. Just because I can! Thanks for enlightening me JB 😉

johnboy 7:55 pm 11 Aug 05

Es-Sense, there are countless ways in which everyone could live their life better.

The point is we usually make choices.

The Government/ActewAGL values water (here) at the very highest rate at $1.53 for 1,000 litres.

So the value of water is bugger all. It costs a thousand times more than the bloody water just to get something to hold it in.

And yet the government (and you it would seem) wants to tell us how and why we can wash our cars, brush our teeth, shower

This isn’t about water conservation, this is a power trip.

I look forward to your instruction as to how I can better wipe my bum to conserve precious (and massively more valuable) toilet paper.

Also I should do some exercise in the morning and eat breakfast, can you come round and rouse me out of bed? Bring food OK?

Thumper 6:51 pm 11 Aug 05


Mega schol sounds like a night on the piss. I meant mega school….

Thumper 6:49 pm 11 Aug 05


Good point about the ovals. Its all false economy. Having being heavily involved in cricket for a long time I’ve seen excellent suburban grounds turned into horse paddocks. The cost to refurbish these ovals now is astronomical, and as such, it will not happen.

And to lead on from that, what happens to these public ovals that have been left to decay? They will get rezoned as residential under the guise that no-one uses them anymore.

Given the current state of of youth, and I will say obese, lazy and fatter than they were, well when I was a kid, this is a travesty.

Apart from that, those ovals are our property. We can go down there and kick a footy, play a bit of cricket, walk the dog, whatever.

Once they are gone, and they will be, they will never be replaced.

And to follow that up, given the new mega schol and the apparent future demolition of both Holt and Higgins schools, those grounds, including their ovals which are ACT school land, will also disappear and will be replaced with houses.

Is this what the population of Canberra wants? A suburban jungle where you no longer have that open space?

I remember when I was involved in ACT junior rep cricket and my son was playing against a Sydney rep side. It was January, hot, and clear. As we watched the cricket and yarned he said, ‘You have such big skies down here.’

After a while it dawned on me that he meant we have plenty of space.

Dwell on it. Its the future disappearing under the guise of development.

Thumper 6:36 pm 11 Aug 05

Cheers Bulldog.

Sometimes the simple solution is the best.

The Es-Sense 4:54 pm 11 Aug 05

Ah, yes, there is nothing like a knock-on effect covering a decent stretch goal while the social mobility is hiding behind the full potential in the broom cupboard 😉

Ralph 4:26 pm 11 Aug 05

I was making a general point. Stage 3 restrictions are more inequitable than stage 2, but they’re still inequitable. Most households probably will find that stage 2 doesn’t impact their activities that much, but as the restrictions get harsher they tend to bite more.

Economically minded readers will know what I’m talking about when I say water retrictions are inequitable. I can’t say it that simply without getting into economic babble about utility functions, non-optimal consumption and Pareto-inefficient outcomes.

The Es-Sense 4:17 pm 11 Aug 05

Ralph: You can water your lawn with a hose! And wash your car with a bucket. And at Stage 2 you can even use a sprinkler, but in the morning or at evening.

The Es-Sense 4:12 pm 11 Aug 05

Yeah…and let them bare-handedly carve the rocks to build Tennent dam, while Vicky D. is lurking in the background with a whip.

Ralph 4:11 pm 11 Aug 05

Water restrictions are inequitable. You can stand with a hose and put water on a garden for 15 mins, but you can’t put water on a lawn or wash a car. Even if you save water in the house, you can’t use what you’ve saved for car washing or lawn watering.

Price it properly and let people use it how they see fit.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | |

Search across the site