Taking ‘good character’ into account jeopardises justice for DV survivors: Victim of Crimes Commissioner

Dominic Giannini 10 August 2021 14
Heidi Yates and Yvette Berry

Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates says taking good character as a mitigating factor during sentencing can deter victims from coming forward. Photo: Dominic Giannini.

‘Good character’ should not be used as a mitigating factor for domestic and sexual violence sentencing, the ACT’s Victim of Crimes Commissioner Heidi Yates says.

The insidious nature of domestic and family violence, including sexual abuse, gives the perpetrator the ability to maintain a public and private image, and a person’s reputation or good character may allow them to abuse their power or relationship with the victim, Ms Yates said.

“An offender’s good character might enable that offending to be masked and remain undetected given the private nature of domestic and family violence,” she said.

ACT courts have not been able to use an offender’s good character to mitigate the severity of a sentence for child sexual abuse matters since 2018, following recommendations from the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.

Mitigated or lenient sentences can skew the course of justice and diminish a victim-survivor’s capacity to come forward in the future, Ms Yates said.

“That recommendation was on the basis that they use their reputation or good character to facilitate the offending or to mask the behaviour as it occurs over time,” she said.

“I think those considerations are relevant in the context of the way we think about how domestic and family violence is perpetrated. For example, DFV (domestic and family violence) cases are also characterised by a misuse of power.”

READ ALSO: Long waitlists and low prosecution rates deterring sexual assault survivors

Ms Yates’ comments come in the context of the ACT’s domestic violence law reform package, the first phase of which passed the Legislative Assembly last week.

The new laws allow magistrates to consider offences in the context of domestic violence during sentencing, which may lead to tougher sentences.

It will also allow police to enter private premises with their body cameras turned on to collect vital evidence relating to domestic violence.

Privacy laws had previously handicapped officers using recording devices on private premises. The new regulations will come into effect once police develop a framework – which must be ticked off by the government – in the next six months.

The second phase of reforms is slated to be introduced by the end of the year and will likely introduce aggravated domestic violence and sexual assault offences.

The aggravated offences will increase the maximum penalties that can be applied by a magistrate during sentencing.

Ms Yates said the proposed good character reforms should form part of this second phase to increase faith in the Territory’s criminal justice system. The first phase allows for greater consistency during the court process.

“At the heart of this, we are looking at improving the effectiveness and efficiency of family violence charging and sentencing practices to better match community expectations,” she said.

“By extension, that will build faith in the criminal justice process.

“One reason victims decide not to report is that the sentencing regime is ineffective and inconsistent, or they had come forward in the past and the sentence was so lenient that they appeared to give the perpetrator leave to continue offending with limited consequence.”

Shane Rattenbury

Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury. Photo: Dominic Giannini.

Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury said victims have had an “unfair run in the system” and the reforms would help more people come forward and navigate the criminal justice system.

“Where a matter does go to court, there should be strong accountability for perpetrators and a strong signal that penalties will be applied when people use violence in those intimate family situations,” he said.

“It is important that courts can take into account matters such as whether it occurred in the privacy of a family home, whether children were present and whether an offender has committed offences before … to make sure sentencing does reflect the circumstances of the case and the community expectation.”

If you or someone you know needs help, support is available through the DVCS 24/7 Crisis Line on 6280 0900 or through 1800 RESPECT. You can also contact Lifeline’s 24-hour crisis support line on 13 11 14. In a life-threatening situation, call triple-zero.

What's Your Opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
14 Responses to Taking ‘good character’ into account jeopardises justice for DV survivors: Victim of Crimes Commissioner
Sonia Pandolfi Sonia Pandolfi 8:34 pm 13 Aug 21

Good for whom?

Russell Nankervis Russell Nankervis 4:40 pm 12 Aug 21

Good people aren't violent

Wee See Chua Wee See Chua 4:07 pm 12 Aug 21

The reason the DV is not exposed for a long time is because the perpetrators often presented themselves differently when they are in the public. Hence to take that into consideration is basically reinforces their excuse to their behaviour

jwinston jwinston 12:58 pm 12 Aug 21

I wonder if the alleged Murrumbateman murderer will play this card?

    Heavs Heavs 4:43 pm 12 Aug 21

    Hopefully the time for honoring yourself will soon be at an end.

Andrew McKenzie Andrew McKenzie 12:23 pm 12 Aug 21

Im not even sure how anyone could justify an abuser as someone with 'good character' to begin with. Completely agree that it ought to have no sway in sentencing. It's unfair to the victim.

Jayne Denise Jayne Denise 9:41 pm 11 Aug 21

Yep, sounds like an oxymoron

TimboinOz TimboinOz 6:47 pm 11 Aug 21

If you are committing domestic violence, being otherwise of ‘good fame and character’ up to the point of being in court.

Is pretty much irrelevant, unless he can be kept away from his victims.

Corey Karl Corey Karl 6:21 pm 11 Aug 21

If they were of good character, they wouldn’t have committed domestic violence!!

Trish Casey Trish Casey 2:50 pm 11 Aug 21

Not only partners. Are Domestic violence perpetraters older Children can also be

hgak hgak 11:14 am 11 Aug 21

Should good character be able to be used as a mitigating factor for any crime?
The perpetrator was obviously not of good character when thy committed the crime.

    Spiral Spiral 12:44 pm 11 Aug 21

    It is sad, but it seems that almost every criminal, no matter how loathsome, can find plenty of people to vouch for their good character.

    I hope magistrates are smart enough to dismiss those biased testimonials.

    Ian Ian 3:41 pm 11 Aug 21

    Yes, I’d have thought that your good character goes out the window the moment you choose to commit any crime.

    GrumpyMark GrumpyMark 10:22 pm 11 Aug 21

    Spot on Isn and Spiral. It’s good to see such progress in areas of domestic violence and sexual assault. However, I fail to see how someone can get tanked on a Saturday night and sucker punch some poor individual and then when they appear before the courts much later, usually dressed in a suit, the “totally out of character” card (with accompanying references) is played by their lawyer.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site