24 May 2024

Taylor, Dutton in step over APS numbers but not migration

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
Peter Dutton and Angus Taylor 1 May 2023

Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor likes the idea of cutting APS and net migration numbers. Photo: Facebook.

Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor won’t rule out a future Coalition government slashing public service job numbers and relocating more government agencies to regional Australia.

Mr Taylor took to the National Press Club on Wednesday (22 May) to criticise Labor’s Federal Budget and defend the Opposition’s alternative positions.

But while he was able to dodge questions about the public service with a smile, he had more trouble explaining why his aspirational migration numbers didn’t align with his boss’s.

Mr Taylor spruiked Coalition policy intentions such as making the instant asset write-off for small business permanent; banning sports gambling ads during live sports telecasts; allowing some people qualified early access to superannuation to help home ownership; and outlawing the use of the internet to glorify crime.

He said the government had produced a budget with no “guard rails’ and the Coalition would restore the rules that put a “speed limit” on taxing and spending.

“[Labor] has abandoned the rules that supported every good budget since Peter Costello established the Charter of Budget Honesty,” Mr Taylor said.

READ ALSO Federal Budget: APS a Budget big winner with 9000 contractors to become public servants

But when asked about the size of the Australian Public Service (APS) and whether the Coalition would reintroduce a staffing cap, the Shadow Treasurer only teased with his response.

Labor removed the Average Staffing Level (ASL) cap in 2022 after being elected. But ASLs remain a tool for internal budgeting purposes.

Nor would Mr Taylor definitively answer whether he intended to further decentralise the APS, despite the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority’s (APVMA) forced relocation from Canberra to Armidale hardly being a successful one.

The APVMA was pushed out of the capital to the NSW regional city following a 2016 order from former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce.

The agency became scandal ridden, with a recent review describing a loss of fundamentals and an embedded culture of toxicity.

The forced relocation resulted in a high turnover of staff, including among the agency’s management ranks.

But Mr Taylor wasn’t biting when asked about slashing APS jobs or decentralising the service.

“All good questions, and be patient,” he said.

“More detail on those numbers will be forthcoming.

“The important point here is this – we do not think that now is the time to add 36,000 Commonwealth public servants…

“Ultimately, it is households and businesses that pay the taxes that pay for those public servants.”

In his budget reply speech to parliament last week, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton attacked the government’s spending on public servants, saying it provided for 36,000 new public sector jobs over the forward estimates.

Mr Dutton wants defence spending to be the priority.

“The government has announced an additional 36,000 public servants in this budget, costing Australian taxpayers $24 billion over four years,” the Opposition Leader said.

“The Coalition sees areas like Defence as much more of a priority than office staff in Canberra given the precarious times in which we live and threats in our region.

“We will reprioritise Canberra-centric funding and make an additional investment in Defence to rapidly enhance the capability of our men and women in uniform.

“We’re working with leaders in defence industry to identify projects and investments that can be made in Australia to keep us safe in an uncertain world.”

READ ALSO Federal Budget: Opposition Leader targets ‘Canberra-centric funding’ in Budget reply

But while the Opposition Leader and his Shadow Treasurer are on the same page regarding the public service, they have delivered mixed messages over net migration rates.

Mr Taylor said in his press club address the Coalition wanted a 25 per cent cut over a term of government, whereas Mr Dutton’s speech flagged a 38 per cent cut.

When repeatedly asked to clear up the confusion, Mr Taylor declined to elaborate, simply saying there was no confusion.

“At the end of the day, we think we can free up 100,000 homes for Australians and it is not hard to work out the calculations that I have to support that,” he said.

Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers ridiculed the Shadow Treasurer’s speech and Q&A.

“Angus Taylor’s speech at the National Press Club was an absolute shambles,” Dr Chalmers said.

“The centrepiece of Peter Dutton’s budget reply is now a smoking ruin because of Angus Taylor’s speech.

“The only thing that Peter Dutton wanted you to know in his budget reply was about migration, and Angus Taylor has completely and utterly stuffed up today in Canberra.

“Peter Dutton lowered the bar and Angus Taylor has tripped over it.”

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments

I’m intrigued as to what the Greens think about immigration’s effects on the environment. I have read the stated aims on immigration, then read about their environmental policies. Doom goblins. You can’t have mass immigration without an effect on the environment – something they can’t grasp

Why cut immigration – So who should we look at to bear responsibility for the current housing crisis?

Concentration of market share by the large corporate housebuilders, and the resulting decline of SMEs, is the inevitable outcome of a free market economy in the absence of government regulations
Land supply is often blamed but in reality the pace and cost of supply is set by the market (which is primarily set by the large corporate builders) and actions such as planning reform or densification, desirable as they may be for other reasons, are unlikely to affect this
Withdrawal of government from public housing provision is a long term trend with few meaningful attempts to reverse it from any part of the political spectrum
Demographic changes and consumer preferences account for the substantial increase in demand not population growth, which is consistent with global trends beyond anything that industry or government can readily change
Immigration levels and urban drift add to demand but are only a small proportion of the impact on housing provision, albeit government does have a role to ensure public services keep pace
Government incentives to invest in housing has tipped the balance away from homeownership towards renting, but is unlikely to have had any significant impact on the quantity (or quality) of new houses being built

Stephen Saunders1:09 pm 24 May 24

Albanese has delivered an appalling 500,000 net migration, two years running. Smashing all previous records.

That”s the real and shocking story. Report that. Not this beat-up.

Show your source Stephen Saunders, or try the ABS:

I observe also that you never managed to learn proportions in primary school.

Your comments on this subject are disinformative twaddle.

There should be a 100% cut to immigration.

OK stop anyone from coming in at all? Spousal visas- gone? Family reunification visas – gone? Specialist knowledge workers – gone?
I don’t think that’s as popular opinion as you think it is.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.