“THE states and territories are preparing to offer the federal government a deal under which they will slash inefficient stamp duties in exchange for a $13 billion slice of the nation’s income tax.” The Australian, this week.
Can Katy Gallagher’s ACT Labor Government seriously argue that they weren’t already discussing and planning this arrangement with the federal government LONG before they started informing us that higher rates would be necessary “in exchange for slashing stamp duty”? And how would this keeping quiet on key information regarding a key policy plank have affected the election one wonders?
And now that it’s out there, how much can rates be kept down for us, please, Katie et al, since you will not be inconvenienced, but compensated federally, for getting rid of stamp duty?