Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Opinion

Expert strata, facilities & building management services

Voluntary assisted suicide in the ACT – which model is best for us?

By Matt Donnelly 18 May 2018 14

The ACT should come up with its own model for voluntary assisted dying.

Last week, after recent failed attempts at suicide, 104-year-old respected academic David Goodall travelled to Switzerland to obtain assistance in ending his life. The ABC reported that he resented the fact that he’d been left with no choice but to travel overseas in order to legally do so.

Australian adults like Dr Goodall should have the right to end their lives painlessly, at a time of their choosing and be legally able to obtain information and assistance in order to die with dignity. However, in the ACT, this right is hampered by federal law prohibiting the Territories from legislating to allow adults to make such choices.

Presently, two draft pieces of legislation are intended for introduction in the Federal Parliament – Liberal Democrats Senator David Leyonhjelm’s private Member’s bill “Restoring Territory Rights (Assisted Suicide Legislation)” and Greens Senator Richard Di Natale and former Labor Senator Katy Gallagher’s “Restoring Territory Rights (Dying with Dignity) Bill 2016”. While it now isn’t clear what will happen to the Di Natale/Gallagher bill, these bills prescribe the same substantive repeal of the Euthanasia Laws Act 1997 (the Andrews Bill) to allow the Territory to pass laws regarding euthanasia.

Earlier this year, the ACT Legislative Assembly called for submissions to the Select Committee on End of Life Choices in the ACT, requesting thoughts on the applicability of voluntary assisted suicide schemes operating outside the ACT. The ACT Liberal Democrats provided a detailed submission, which can be found here.

Victoria has recently legislated for voluntary assisted dying. While Victoria’s scheme is a step forward for Australia, I do not believe it is an appropriate model for Canberra. It is bureaucratic and cumbersome – its timeframes are likely to prolong suffering. There is also a risk of many people dying from their condition before they can die under the freedom Victoria proposes to vest. Moreover, it will only allow residents of Victoria to participate.

By not covering the range of immense suffering possible across the human experience, the scope of the Victorian model is too narrow. By vesting power in the State to determine what must be endured and what is possible to endure, it is unnecessarily paternalistic. Such a narrow approach is not centred on the needs of the patient.

The model used in Switzerland provides the benchmark for any voluntary assisted dying scheme as it is a patient-centred approach based on self-determination. Its system of reporting and investigation of all suicides limits the scope for abuse and enables strong enforcement if necessary. Provided that the person assisting another to die is not motivated by selfish motives, an offence has not been committed. This means that assistance can be provided by friends and relatives. With no requirement that doctors be involved, the vast majority of assisted suicides are not directly supervised by doctors and assistance is often provided by voluntary organisations such as Exit.

The ACT, as a progressive, mature and sophisticated jurisdiction, has the willingness and capacity to develop the most appropriate voluntary assisted dying system in Australia and should be free to do so.

I invite Rioters to offer their thoughts and suggestions on what model would best suit Canberra, and why.

Matt Donnelly was a Liberal Democrats candidate for the Senate in the 2016 federal election, and ran in Brindabella in the 2016 ACT election.


What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
14 Responses to
Voluntary assisted suicide in the ACT – which model is best for us?
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Trish Roberts 4:50 pm 19 May 18

While the Hospice does much good work, as a Catholic organisation they are unwilling and unable to provide voluntary assisted dying. Canberra needs a non-Catholic hospice.

Maya123 8:33 am 19 May 18

Anne Booms, fine, but there should also be assisted dying for those that want it. I knew someone in palliative care – I’m sure he was getting good care – but he had had enough and wanted to die. It should have been his choice. If catholics want to suffer for their religion (and it is I would guess mostly catholics who object to assisted dying), fine, but for those with other beliefs and no beliefs it should be their choice. However, in this case because of the law he couldn’t be helped. In the end he refused to eat. Not the considerate way it should be.

Anne Booms 7:21 am 19 May 18

What about some more progressiveness in funding palliative services in the ACT... for example there is this large teaching hospital with no acute palliative care ward, overstretched PC resources and people dying badly because of lack of palliative specialist staff.

    Liz Fahey 10:58 am 19 May 18

    Unfortunately it’s easier to kill than help

    Matt Donnelly 5:08 pm 19 May 18

    Anne, I agree that palliative care is a very important service in our community.

    Australia currently offers some of the best palliative care available anywhere in the world. The Economist’s Investigative Unit has released studies on the quality of palliative care in some 80 countries, and in the most recent (2015) report Australia was ranked #2 in the world, behind the UK. While that’s great news, I’d love to see us ranked #1.

    Please keep in mind that there is little evidence that palliative care provision suffers when assisted suicide legislation is introduced. In the Netherlands, Switzerland and Belgium (countries where voluntary assisted suicide laws already exist), palliative care resources remain in line with those of other high-income countries.

    https://eiuperspectives.com/sites/default/files/2015%20EIU%20Quality%20of%20Death%20Index%20Oct%2029%20FINAL_0.pdf

scouserdog 2:13 am 19 May 18

The Swiss model seems sensible to me

Paul Chubb 3:54 pm 18 May 18

None

Peter Brassington 1:13 pm 18 May 18

Any and or all

Sarah Powles 11:14 am 18 May 18

None.

Jessica Brisbane 7:37 am 18 May 18

A pretty pointless discussion, because the Feds will just overrule us again.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site