War Memorial lodges plans for main redevelopment works

Ian Bushnell 2 August 2021 7
South entrance artist's impression

An artist’s impression of the new Southern Entrance and parade ground. Image: Scott Carver and Synthetica.

The Australian War Memorial has lodged plans with the National Capital Authority for the three main projects for its controversial $500 million redevelopment following approval of its so-called Early Works that included the demolition of the award-winning Anzac Hall.

The Main Works application includes the new Anzac Hall and Glazed Link; the new Southern Entrance, forecourt and parade ground; and the Bean Building Extension.

The earlier approval in June has paved the way for these proposed works. Opponents of the redevelopment had argued the demolition of Anzac Hall and the extensive tree removal should not have been considered separately, and labelled the approval a fait accompli for the rest of the redevelopment.

The tree removals and demolition have been underway since late June.

The proposed new, bigger Anzac Hall and Glazed Link immediately north of the existing Main Building will double the area available to display large artifacts such as aircraft that are currently unable to be viewed by the public.

The Memorial says the new Anzac Hall will enable the stories of recent conflicts to be told while ensuring the continued display of artifacts from earlier wars.

It says the Glazed Link provides a more visitor-friendly connection between the two buildings.

The Glazed Link

The Glazed Link between the Main Building and the new Anzac Hall. Image: Cox Architecture.

The proposed Southern Entrance will offer improved weatherproof access to the main building and galleries, with particular consideration to the needs of people with impaired mobility.

The original Commemorative Forecourt, stairs and heritage entrance will be reinstated, with the addition of an oculus to the Entry Hall below.

The existing parade ground will be modified to better suit the existing grid geometry of the Main Building and improve sightlines to the Stone of Remembrance.

New terraces at the sides of the parade ground will improve seating capacity and safety for major events, with accessible seating to all central tiers and upper terraces.

The proposed Bean Building Extension will include a new Research Centre and Reading Room and house the Memorial’s extensive archives.

The memorial says the new facility will allow space to digitise and preserve the archives and offer researchers more efficient, welcoming and secure access to the National Collection and reference materials.

AWM Bean Extension

The Bean Extension. Image: Lyons Architecture.

Existing research facilities will be relocated from the main AWM building and the space converted into galleries.

A proposed Central Energy Plant to the north-east of the site will include a substation, switch room, chiller plant, cooling tower plant, boiler plant, waste area, fire tanks, fire pumps and valves, fire control room and gas meter.

Three public information sessions conducted by the architects are planned for the National Library.

On Tuesday 10 August, the construction of the new Southern Entrance, Main Building Refurbishment Works (external), Forecourt and Parade Ground Works will be covered, followed by Bean Extension and energy plant on Wednesday, 11 August and Anzac Hall and the Glazed Link on Thursday, 12 August from 6:00 pm.

Bookings are through Eventbrite for attending in person or viewing as a live stream.

Submissions can be made to the NCA from 21 August to 10 September.

The Early Works proposal attracted about 600 submissions, which were overwhelmingly opposed to the redevelopment, but the Memorial says its research showed nationwide support.

The proposal has been condemned by many groups, academics and former Memorial directors as a waste of money, heritage travesty and re-writing of the AWM’s original mission statement.

The redevelopment is expected to take a decade to complete.

To view all the plans and learn more about the consultation and submissions, visit the NCA website.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
7 Responses to War Memorial lodges plans for main redevelopment works
Nick Swain Nick Swain 4:45 pm 03 Aug 21

All too late. Once Parliament (our elected rep[resentatives) approved the reno no consultations could stop it.

MERC600 MERC600 3:51 pm 03 Aug 21

Looks impressive. Should help in keeping it our major attraction.

David Lindesay David Lindesay 12:48 pm 03 Aug 21

Luke want to go to the info sessions?

David Stephens David Stephens 10:20 am 03 Aug 21

The NCA is blowing smoke on this. Sure, lots of submissions revisited aspects already determined by Public Works Committee and Minister for Environment. But other submissions focused squarely on the NCA part of the process. When more than 20 people sought Statements of Reasons (under ADJR Act) from the NCA for its decision on the Memorial’s early works, they received a ‘one size fits all’ response from the NCA which did not focus on points raised by individuals and which related specifically to the NCA’s work. An example: how was the NCA able to discharge its responsibility to assess the Memorial’s application against the provisions of the National Capital Plan, when the application explicitly said it did not address the provisions of the Plan? The NCA’s one size fits all response ignored this point and its remarks related to the latest consultation continue to evade key points.

Heavs Heavs 10:17 am 03 Aug 21

NCA don’t set the budget or allocate the funds genius. Maybe if all these objectors had actually objected to the planning decision, on grounds which could actually be considered, they might have a chance to stop this.

“it’s a massive waste of money and a monstrosity” isn’t going to get you too far.

Liam O'Toole Liam O'Toole 7:41 pm 02 Aug 21

National Capital Authority ignored all submission put in against the redevelopment. It's the biggest waste of money and vanity project when it could be used to help veterans. Another young soldier at 7RAR Pre Alex Nicols was lost yet somehow they think this redevelopment will remember him!

    Jon Billows Jon Billows 9:44 am 03 Aug 21

    Liam O'Toole There is a massive difference between ignoring submission and considering the submission then determining its relevance.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

 Top
Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site