8 October 2024

It's hard being independently independent in this ACT election

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
4

Independents for Canberra: despite the name, there are other candidates running as ‘independents’ in the ACT election. Photo: IFC.

Canberrans have already begun early voting and the ACT’s actual election day is less than two weeks away.

The parties have their policies well and truly out there, and tonight (8 October), Andrew Barr and Elizabeth Lee will go head-to-head at the National Press Club for a televised debate where we will all get to hear more about Labor/Greens and Liberal policies.

But I want to talk a little about the independents in this election and a quirk of the campaign that has been beneficial to some and detrimental to others.

It’s all in the name.

This territory election has seen a healthy showing of independent candidates vying for an electoral win in a Hare-Clark system that doesn’t make it easy if you’re not from one of the three major parties.

This election, however, independents are making a noise, being heard and, for some, they’re being taken seriously.

But there’s the anomaly.

For a growing number of Canberrans, the belief is that the independents are all aligned and are just one group.

And it’s a misconception the government and the opposition are more than willing to exploit.

READ ALSO The gloves are off: Barr and Lee go toe-to-toe over economic credentials and costings

The Libs say a vote for independents will be a vote for the Greens, while Labor says an independent vote will go straight to the Liberals.

“The only time the Canberra Liberals have formed government in the ACT is with the support of independents,” says one ALP ad.

“So if you’re voting independent this election, you might be putting the most conservative Liberals in the country into power.

“Liberals who voted against abortion access and against voluntary assisted dying.”

It’s that last line that has got a few of the independent candidates riled.

Some of them are vehemently opposed to restricting women’s rights to abortion and just as strongly in favour of voluntary assisted dying.

Yet Labor, with one general statement, has tarred all of the independents in this campaign with the same brush.

They know there are various groups of independents and that they differ on policy positions.

The Libs know it, too, but it is very convenient for the conservatives to encourage the idea that all of the indies are ‘radical lefties’.

For many voters, it is easy to believe that the independents are all one movement. Maybe it has something to do with how they’re named.

READ ALSO Everything you need to know to vote in the ACT election

Independents for Canberra chose wisely.

That’s a clever name and it has morphed into ‘Canberra Independents’ for many.

Whether by design or just good luck, when people refer to independents at this stage of the election campaign, they increasingly think the Independents for Canberra are the sum total of the Canberra independent candidates.

The government is happy with that because, despite there being some good candidates among the Independents for Canberra, there is more formidable experience, brainpower, community involvement and debating ability from some of the smaller independent candidates and groupings in this campaign.

Independent candidate Fiona Carrick attracted the largest independent vote in the 2020 election. Photo: fionacarrick.com.

Fiona Carrick, who is running in Murrumbidgee, almost won a seat previously due to her extraordinary community advocacy.

Peter Strong and Ann Bray of Strong Independents (another clever name) have enormous experience in business, community and diplomacy.

These are all affronted by being grouped in with a homogeneous ‘Canberra Liberals’ moniker and with the major parties saying they are all the same and confederate.

woman standing in a field

Ann Bray is running with Peter Strong under the Strong Independents banner. Photo: Ann Bray.

Ann Bray is particularly outraged that Andrew Barr would suggest a vote for her would be a vote to help the Liberals outlaw abortion and voluntary assisted dying.

It’s an easy jab for the government to make, and I guess that’s politics.

But when Labor and Liberal leaders only want to debate one group of independents with the reasoning that they represent all of the independent candidates, we can be sure it’s because they don’t want to go up against the more experienced – and more truly independent – campaigners.

Election campaign poster

A Belco Party ad seen posted around town that has Gungahlin spelt wrong. Photo: Region.

That brings us to the Belco Party, spearheaded by former Liberal Party leader Bill Stefaniak.

They can be as truly independent as any of the others, but if they can’t even spell Gungahlin correctly (as this campaign poster of theirs attests), then they really have no claim to being connected to the community.

Join the conversation

4
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Tom McLuckie1:27 pm 08 Oct 24

Your words for once Jack D made sense, until I realised you were not referring to the last 12 years of Greens-Labor government where we have had the most dysfunctional parliament our city, and quite possibly the country, has ever seen. Fear mothering that independents will break our parliamentary system is a new low for ACT Labor and has no foundation in fact.

I am confused! The Independent candidates promote themselves as a grouping of individuals with different ideas on what they will bring to the assembly, but on the other they say they are all aligned and just one united party!

Just who are the independents? Are they a grouping of individuals with different intents and purposes refusing to compromise their beliefs should they win balance of power or are they a united party with set policy positions? Anyone who questions their ideas are directed towards their website which lacks details.

The Independents refuse to reveal which of the major parties they will support should they win balance of power. Will they be prepared to provide ongoing and consistent support for any one party or will they just cause turmoil and confusion? Flip-flopping between parties and issues, refusing to compromise their beliefs on what is best for our city and its future.

These so-called independents who may possibly control the balance of power in a new government who are not prepared to compromise with any one side is a recipe for disaster and paves the way for the most dysfunctional parliament our city has ever seen!

Jack, will Labor rule out forming another alliance with Greens, or will you keep us in the dark until after the election?

Jack D.
We know that you, and your cabal on first floor of City Plaza Apartments, are easily confused when it comes to the non-Labor matters of ACT politics – some would say even on matters Labor in ACT politicis, but I would never be so unkind.

Nevertheless, those of us who are not interested in the lemming-like party voting principle, understand that, while people can share the same ideological ethos, they can also embrace individual thought. So far from being confusing, it’s actually refreshing to see a group of candidates under a single banner who are free to vote as they see fit – without fear of being ostracised, or even punted, from the collective.

Oh and as for your prediction that the world will cease to exist should the independents control the balance of power? The ACT has had several independent controlled minority (rather than a coalition) governments, including the first Follett-led 1989 – 1991 Labor ACT government. Not surprisingly, the sky didn’t fall in and those governments were able to achieve accountable outcomes through negotiation

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.