1 February 2024

Letter from the Editor: Can independents finally shift ACT's tediously static political landscape?

| Genevieve Jacobs
Join the conversation
23
Fiona Carrick

Could Fiona Carrick and independents like her finally shift the balance of power in the Legislative Assembly? Photo: File.

As they say in the boxing ring (or behind the bike sheds at school), it’s on!

The ACT will go to an election in October on our fixed four-year cycle, and it looks increasingly likely there will be a strong field of independent candidates to challenge the longstanding Labor hegemony.

Bill Stefaniak and Chic Henry ventured forth with the Belco Party as high-profile candidates in 2020. Running only in Ginninderra, they attracted 9.4 per cent of the vote on a fairly slender platform of policies. The Canberra Progressives ran in each seat and received a total of 5443 votes across the electorate.

This time, roughly nine months out from the election, we have an announcement already from Peter Strong, a long-time head of the Council of Small Business Organisations Australia. He’ll run with Ann Bray, a trained medical scientist, 35-year veteran of the Commonwealth public service and, most recently, an Australian diplomat in Washington, DC.

Fiona Carrick, who has many years leading the Woden Community Council under her belt, says she’s looking for candidates without confirming whether she’ll run herself. Ms Carrick made a strong showing in the 2020 election with 3783 votes, well within the ballpark for election under the Hare Clark system and somewhat ahead of others who were subsequently elected on preferences.

READ ALSO ‘Slap in the face’: Braddon traders feel short-changed by disruptive street upgrades

Why does this matter? Because democracy.

I don’t care who you vote for or how you feel: nobody should be in power exclusively for a quarter century. It’s bad for everyone.

Labor is deeply comfortable and that means the rigour, the close-grained examination of policy, the self-examination that’s necessary for good government, can go missing.

The ACT public service is even more comfortable. A generation has passed through the system, reliant on process over action, content that little will change no matter what the next election brings.

The Canberra Liberals are ineffective, weakened by decades without meaningful experience in delivering policy for good or ill. The last person in their team with any experience in government was Vicky Dunne, who stepped down four years ago.

The Greens have not been tested away from the protected environment provided by their sometimes tetchy partnership with Labor. In government but not in charge, they can explore ideas without taking much responsibility for their implementation or effects.

Backbenchers on both sides are quiet minions in the machine for the most part while in the background, party rooms squabbles over pre-selection focus on factions among the Liberals and quotas in Labor.

READ ALSO Deal restores winning preselection candidate to Brindabella ticket after party figures intervene

Candidates with profile and experience in their communities – and actual policies, not populist click-bait – could finally challenge business as usual.

It’s unlikely on the numbers that government will change – and unclear from the candidates whether they would guarantee supply as Michael Moore did for Kate Carnell a quarter century ago.

But surely it’s worth a shot? Surely a couple of independents with some mettle and real-life experience would have the capacity to ask hard questions on all sides and fire up our sometimes somnolent political processes?

The independents would need to be in the centre to attract disenchanted party voters. David Pocock’s successful community-based campaign shows the momentum is clearly there to be harnessed with the right candidates and the right support.

Among the major parties, Andrew Barr is a seasoned scrapper; Elizabeth Lee has indicated she’s giving it her best shot, and the Greens will be looking to hold their unexpected six-seat result from 2020.

Let’s hope it’s an interesting campaign ahead and that, for once, something will change.

Join the conversation

23
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
HiddenDragon8:40 pm 21 Jan 24

Anything more than cosmetic change to the composition of the Legislative Assembly and the way in which this town is governed will only happen if it is driven by external forces which seriously impact upon the willingness and ability of federal governments of both persuasions to continue spending ever-growing amounts of taxpayer funds in our little patch of the world.

If/when that happens – and the fiscal, technological and geopolitical risks of it are growing – Canberrans will, after they go through the various stages of grief (probably over a few electoral cycles), need to look for something more than candidates whose essential pitch is “vote for me because I will do a better job of managing the status quo”.

In the meantime, the extravagance, stuff-ups, unapologetic incompetence and posturing mediocrity will roll on largely unabated and unpunished by a complacent electorate.

We will see how supportive Canberrans are for the tram after the next election
デ スティーブ. Judging by how popular light rail is for residents in Gungahlin, I expect voters on the south side to be just as enthusiastic. This has been reflected in the results of the previous three elections. The Liberals lost two high profile candidates in Brindabella and Kurrajong and the party’s current leader barely scraped over the line!

Another light rail election brought to us by the policy light Canberra Liberals! 😂😂

Jack,
Strange, my ballot paper didn’t have a choice of light rail or not.

And seeing as the Liberals took support of light rail to the last election as a policy and lost support, your claims don’t really match up with reality.

I look forward to you providing details of the Canberra Liberals policy on the light rail project that they took to the last election chewy. Not the changed or empty election commitment Mr Coe announced, and could not explain, in an excruciating interview on ABC radio four months before the election. The policy that his colleagues and the party’s candidates were unaware or informed about in rolling out the light rail extension across Canberra.

This was a major policy change for the Canberra Liberals but did not stop the party or its candidates campaigning against the light rail project right up until the election!

Jack D,
What on earth is that word salad supposed to be?

The Liberals stated policy for the 2020 election included support for light rail.

And the party and candidates most certainly did not campaign against their own policy in the campaign, you’re just making stuff up because you were caught out telling porkies again.

Being a Labor town, it’s nigh on impossible for Canberrans to accept the Liberals under Elizabeth Lee, while the spectre of the right looms in the background.

So, it’s pleasing to see an alternative in the form of moderate independents. Candidates who, as well as being (IMHO) acceptable to main stream centrist Canberrans, will provide the scrutiny and accountability sadly lacking in the present arrangement.

Agree, Elizabeth Lee is a minnow

@Futureproof
I’m not sure I’d call Elizabeth Lee a minnow, as I expect she is the most well known of the Liberal MLAs. However, she does have a credibility issue – not personal, but rather in trying to sell the “new Liberal brand” while the old guard remains in the background.

Martin Keast12:48 pm 20 Jan 24

I do agree that it is time for a change. Recent events such as the Calvary Hospital takeover and the rushed Conversion Practices ban with token notice taken of dissenting voices have shown there is a strong degree of complacency in our current government. Our system of government works when there is an effective check on power through the accountability provided by coming to the electorate. Our public service has been given far too much autonomy and easily feels beyond challenge for they do not even have to face re-election. We need fresh leadership that will challenge the public service and call them to account.

I am pleased that we have a government that is active in promoting and legislating for greater respect, tolerance and gender equality in our society Martin Keast! It is particularly disappointing and hurtful for many, including me to see those in our society, particularly Christian schools and their leadership, actively promoting intolerance and discriminating against those who are different!!

+1, agreed Jack D.
Calvary Hospital was not offering all needed services. And Conversion Practices are cruel and shouldn’t exist in this day and age. It was an interesting survey in the Canberra Times, with one question, ‘Did you attend a religious service at Christmas.’ 88% answered no. Even the occasional church attendee would surely attend at Christmas. It would appear Martin Keast is very much in the minority. More so, in that I am guessing the CT readers would tend to be older than the average age of Canberra.

Martin, I agree it’s time for a change, but I wouldn’t count on those two issues swinging the vote back to the Libs. Many people found the concept of Conversion Practices to be extremely disturbing. That change will not lose votes. As far as the Calvary takeover, the main concern was the lack of notice, particularly for the staff involved, rather than the concept. In fact, many are glad that the only public hospital on the northside is no longer under the control of a religious organisation. Many more are also glad that one of the major hurdles in upgrading and expanding hospital facilities on the northside has been removed. (I even know members of the Libs who, off the record, support the takeover because they will reap the benefits when they eventually regain government without being seen to be the ones with dirty hands. Off the record, they know that contract had to be ripped up)

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.