1 November 2024

Australia must brace for more intense weather events: State of the Climate report

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
76
Storm approaching farm

Australia can look forward to more extreme weather events, say CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology. Photo: Sally Hopman.

Longer fire seasons, more heatwaves, heavier rainfall and rising seas levels are now the norm for Australia and look set to increase, according to the latest State of the Climate report.

CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology (BoM), who prepare the “health check” every two years, released the State of the Climate Report 2024 on Thursday (31 October).

The report draws on the latest national and international climate research, monitoring and projection information to describe changes and long-term trends in Australia’s climate.

The report’s authors describe the document as a “synthesis of the science that underpins our understanding” of Australia’s climate.

It is intended to inform economic, environmental and social decision-making by governments, industries and communities.

The latest report shows the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere continues to increase, contributing to climate change, with 2023 the warmest year on record globally.

And while Australia’s overall emissions have declined since 2005, it’s projected to see continued warming over the coming decades with more extremely hot days and fewer extremely cool days.

The rate of emissions decline will need to accelerate from now to meet Australia’s 2030 emissions targets, the report states.

READ ALSO Anti-Corruption Commissioner found to have engaged in ‘officer misconduct’ over Robodebt balldrop

Scientists found the oceans around Australia were continuing to warm with increases in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere leading to more acidic oceans, particularly to the south.

CSIRO research manager Jaci Brown said ocean warming had contributed to longer and more frequent marine heatwaves with the highest average sea surface temperature on record occurring in 2022.

“Increases in temperature have contributed to significant impacts on marine habitats, species and ecosystem health, such as the most recent mass coral bleaching event on the Great Barrier Reef this year,” Dr Brown said.

“Rising sea levels around Australia are increasing the risk of inundation and damage to coastal infrastructure and communities. Global mean sea level is increasing, having risen by around 22 centimetres since 1900. Half of this rise has occurred since 1970.

“The rates of sea level rise vary across the Australian region, with the largest increases in the north and southeast of the Australian continent.”

The report describes the shift towards drier conditions from April to October across the southwest and southeast, and reduced rainfall in southwest Australia now seems to be a permanent feature of the climate.

The BoM’s climate services manager Karl Braganza said lower rainfall in the cooler months was leading to lower average streamflow in those regions.

He said that could impact soil moisture and water storage levels and increase the risk of drought.

“Droughts this century have been significantly hotter than those in the past,” Dr Braganza said.

“However, when heavy rainfall events occur, they are becoming more intense with an increase of around 10 per cent or more in some regions.

“The largest increases are in the north of the country with seven of the 10 wettest wet seasons since 1998 occurring in northern Australia.”

READ ALSO National disease control centre to be set up in Canberra

Dr Braganza also noted Australia was continuing to warm – eight of the nine warmest years on record have occurred since 2013.

“This warming has led to an increase in extreme fire weather and longer fire seasons across large parts of the country,” he said.

Key points from the report show:

  • Australia’s climate has warmed by an average of 1.51 degrees Celsius since national records began in 1910.
  • Sea surface temperatures have increased by an average of 1.08C since 1900.
  • The warming has led to an increase in the frequency of extreme heat events over land and in the oceans.
  • A decrease of about 16 per cent in April to October rainfall in the southwest of Australia since 1970. Across the same region, May to July rainfall has seen the largest reduction – by about 20 per cent since 1970.
  • A decrease of about 9 per cent in April to October rainfall in the southeast of Australia since 1994.
  • Heavy short-term rainfall events are becoming more intense.
  • A decrease in streamflow at most gauges across Australia since 1970.
  • An increase in rainfall and streamflow across parts of northern Australia since the 1970s.
  • An increase in extreme fire weather and a longer fire season across large parts of the country since the 1950s.
  • A decrease in the number of tropical cyclones observed in the Australian region since at least 1982.
  • Snow depth, snow cover and number of snow days have decreased in alpine regions since the late 1950s.
  • Oceans around Australia are becoming more acidic with changes happening faster in recent decades.
  • Sea levels are rising around Australia, including more frequent extreme high levels that increase the risk of inundation and damage to coastal infrastructure and communities.

“In addition to extreme heat, many other climate hazards are expected to be more significant at 2C or higher global warming levels than at 1.5C or at present-day levels,” the report states.

“These include increased coastal inundation as a result of rising sea levels, increased heavy precipitation, increases in human health risks, water stress, and impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems on land and in the oceans.”

Join the conversation

76
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Didnt Tim Flannery apparently once say that Sydneys dams would never be full again due to climate something?

And why do wealthy people keep buying sea side properties if climate thingy is supposed to put the coast underwater?

Has anyone told the PM?

@stevew77
Yes – and in 2007, Flannery was named Australian of the Year, by none other than (then) PM, John Howard, who declared “He has encouraged Australians into new ways of thinking about our environmental history and future ecological challenges.”

Do you actually have a point to make?

Tim Flannery made a notable statement in 2007 regarding climate change and its impact on rainfall. He said that due to hotter soils, “even the rain that falls isn’t actually going to fill our dams and river systems”. So considering all the floods we had a few years ago he couldn’t been more wrong. Yet he is never held to account for getting it so wrong and still goes around sprouting climate change rubbish. He has lost all credibility.

Again with the supercilious sneering. Oi vei.

Capital Retro9:21 am 07 Nov 24

The National Australia Day Council (NADC) Board selects the Australian of the Year.
The PM of the day announces it along with the blurb.
If Howard had indeed selected Flannery Howard would have a lot more Haters than he already had at that time.

@Capital Retro
Oh and Howard would have ‘done what he was told’ and simply read the speech he was given, eh, CR?

@Rustygear
Yeah, facts can be a bit supercilious to the likes of you.

@dazzer
The world and the science have moved on since 2007, dazzer.

Scientists continually revisit and retest their hypotheses, in the light of new evidence etc., perhaps you should move on too.

I find it amusing that some people believe in climate change. The actual science says no such thing.
People of course are free to believe what they want, such is the strength of democracy.
What i find difficult to comprehend how those who preach “tolerance” appear to smear any climate ” unbelievers”.
Logic and level headed discourse is required, a bit like Trump who is a businessman who speaks a degree of common sense.

“Logic and level headed discourse is required, a bit like Trump …”
Yeah right. When you actually come back with some real science to support your denialism, perhaps then such a discourse can take place.

The guy just says he can’t comprehend why the be-kind crowd only respond with smears, and then you JS respond to him with that sneering supercilious tone of yours. As to Trump, that’d be a large reason why he’s ahead 5 million in the popular vote — people are tired of elite arrogance and inflated self-regard.

@Rustygear
… and people are also tired of ignorant climate deniers, who can offer nothing other than “it’s cr*p” in support of their (non) argument.

Is this the same CSIRO that claimed nuclear would be more expensive and that green schemes would be cheaper power prices.

Is this the same Henry who gets nothing right?

This ought to be filed under “religious affairs”. There’s the holier than thou true believers looking up in awe at the signs, there’s the religious warriors keen to smite the disbelievers, then the clucking and tutting Mrs Buckets who just follow the crowd for social acceptance and the glow of self-righteousness; and then there’s the terrible, evil sceptics — the heretics who this time around get branded as beyond-the-pale “deniers”, every one of them 100% guilty of every smear in the book. Human history just repeats itself — new issue, same old pathological personalities, same old mechanisms of mass psychosis.

Your adumbration of denialism seems fair.

My daughter who is 19 laughs at what she calls “the blue hair crowd” who often spout the usual leftist/marxist climate drivel. The general marxist mechanism is if you can pass nonsense climate laws, you can slowly kill the economy to kill off the middle class – which appears to be the intended target.

Petr Hochbichler5:15 pm 04 Nov 24

I love it when dolts use the word “marxist” despite the fact that they don’t have the slightest notion of its meaning in any context. Similarly, the word “left” and variations thereof. The second you see variants of the word left on the internet, one can be certain that it’s author is a clueless, uneducated moron who’s entire personality and education (of lack of) is made up exclusively of garbage they saw on the internet and blather out as their own.

@stevew77
Congratulations … my 3 1/2 year old kelpie also doesn’t believe in climate change – but I don’t parade her ignorance, as proof in refuting the science of anthropogenic climate change.

Looks like you may have hit a nerve there Steve. 🤣

Heywood Smith3:52 pm 05 Nov 24

Are you a dog whisperer? Can you ask my dog to stop barking at night?

Nick Stevens1:28 pm 02 Nov 24

Predictably conservative elderly people talking down the science of climate change, that WILL affect the young and yet to be born, through their ignorance and stupidity.
The planet increasingly belongs to a younger generation that are concerned with and want to be involved with limiting the continuing onset of climate change.
And yes it WILL be EV’s powered by clean energy sources.

wildturkeycanoe7:39 pm 02 Nov 24

Predictable new generation blaming all their woes on previous ones.
You do know that your “science” has proven the existence of catastrophic climate change in cycles since the dawn of man?
Also, all of your electrified future relies on pillaging the earth for rare minerals, the process of which contributes to your dilemma. Disposal of same creating another environmental disaster.
Above all, your desperate plea goes unanswered by the main culprits, the most polluting countries in the world. Ant efforts we do with our pitiful contribution to this apparent problem will do nothing to stop the inevitable.

Or….people could read actual science instead of climate fairy stories.

Actual science – everyone should look up the Vostok Ice Core study that tracks gases caught in ice going back approx. 800,00 years. It shows CO2 follows temperature with a lag of about 800 years, or at times CO2 no zero correlation with temperature.

Oh hello stevew77, still peddling your previously throughly debunked claims?

Would you like to say that the Vostok data is mysteriously hidden, yet to be unleashed on the real world of science? Is it a …conspiracy…??

Do you imagine scientists do not understand it, that they would not with the passage of time recognise a refutation if it existed? – one that does not exist in this case.

What a reputation is to be gained by a scientist who can upturn a world of scientific thought!

In fact the Vostok cores **support** the thesis of CO2 forcing global warming. Hint: think of process lags.

In fact you do not really understand science do you stevew77, or else you would not have repeatedly skipped my previous challenge which I reiterate for you now:
Define science such that it includes all other accepted science while excluding known climate science.

Capital Retro6:29 pm 04 Nov 24

Your younger generation should direct their concerns to China. Why don’t they demonstrate outside their embassy? It would be a great social media event. Let’s see, re-charging all those devices and building new cloud storage to store all the crap that social media generates now needs about 10% of the world electricity supply. Your younger generation flies to Europe or Bali frequently I guess? Those forms of travel are creating over 15% of global greenhouse emissions.

Not sure if you spent much time with the younger generation but many of them want their electricity to come from a reliable, clean, safe, 24/7, energy source that is nuclear. They are not hung up on outdated nuclear scare tactics from the 1980s like some of the elderly people that continually talk it down. I’ve found they are not really fond of EV’s either as they, or the smart ones at least, have worked out that EV’s are from environmentally friendly either. Glad to know that you think that the one’s that do have EV’s WILL be powered by clean energy sources, such as nuclear.

Nick Stevens7:23 am 06 Nov 24

byline, sadly those who talk down the science of climate change, would rather waddle around like constipated cabbages, than consider even for a moment that this is a real event, that will affect future generations long after they have shuffled off to the great cabbage in the sky. I apologise to any cabbage offended by my remarks.

HiddenDragon9:27 pm 01 Nov 24

Part of a sensible response to this would be a more realistic approach to the assessment of the risks presented by fire fuel loads – particularly here in the ACT where there is (and for many years has been) a high degree of denial about fire and storm damage risks in tree protection policies.

Climate change is an indisputable fact. The longer we leave it the worse the damage and the more it will cost to address.

Politicising serious issues rather than addressing them on their merits is not rational.

I look forward to your peer-reviewed paper in Nature disproving Climate Change Ken, until then you’re talking out of your…hat.

CaptainSpiff6:48 pm 01 Nov 24

@Seano – “Climate change is a fact”. What a meaningless statement.

You and the rest of the climate cult are claiming something much more than just that the climate changes. You are claiming:
– that the ~1.5 degree warming in the last century is catastrophic
– that the ~1.5 degree warming is all due to CO2 emissions
– that there is somehow a correct baseline for climate
– that experts with no track record of predictions, can predict the climate 100+ years from now, just by running computer models
– that government can “fix” the climate if they are just given enough money

What a joke.

Get a load of this guy who thinks something being peer reviewed makes it right. 🤣

I could cite a couple of hundred peer reviewed papers that either outright refute or cast massive doubt on human caused climate change, but why waste my time? You’ll just whine about some other aspect.

I bet you even use anti scientific phrases like “the science is settled” as well. LOL

You can’t though can you Ken, not unless you cite papers published in obscure crank publications.

You don’t get to dismiss the science because it doesn’t suit your culture wars.

The science climate change is established until you can prove otherwise, otherwise you’re making a fool of yourself and can be ignored.

@CaptainSpiff Until you can prove what you’re saying you can be ignored. I, therefore, look forward to your peer-reviewed paper disproving climate change, I would actually welcome it.

Until then you’re just pushing culture wars nonsense, which won’t make the issue go away and is not a rational position.

🤣
Thanks for proving my point, champ. I didn’t even have to cite a paper for you to start your whine about “crank publications”. It’s as if you climate cult kooks all work off the same disingenuous playbook.

You didn’t cite a paper Ken because you can’t.

You can continue to hide behind the lie but we both know that’s the coward’s way out.

Every one of CaptainSpiff’s supposed points, each being in the nature of straw man or false extrapolation argument, represents either disinformation or scientific ignorance.

But you havent mentioned the artificial atmospheric heating practiced by many countries. This has a capability to alter weather on demand, create droughts etc. The US Air Force wrote a research paper about owning the weather by 2025.

Canberra is still as freezing as ever during winter. Once we start having warm winters, that’s when I will believe in climate change.

Weather is what’s happening now, climate change is the trend over time. Over time the planet is warming and this is having all sorts of knock-on effects that we are not prepared to deal with, mitigate, adapt to or reverse.

Pretending it’s not happening doesn’t make it go away, kicking the can down the road only leaves a bigger mess for your kids and grandkids.

That recent stratosperic warming event which destabilised the southern hemisphere polar vortex and repeatedly allowed cold air to escape across Australia. Or… but, you know, I walked outside and it was cold so warming doesn’t exist. As a species, I reckon it’s just Karma now.

“Climate Change is a trend over time”. I agree.
I also agree it is getting warmer these days.
Just like it did after the last 6 times that ice covered the globe (they were called ice ages).
Obviously it was all the dinosours farting that caused the global warming on those occasions. The cave men didn’t burn much coal in those days.

when the communists tell you that *capitalism causes climate change and that it needs to be replaced with communism to save the planet, you don’t believe the climate change narrative

*not an endorsement of capitalism per se, although it can be better in some cases than any kind of communism

We can work to produce cleaner energy and clean up this mess in a capitalist society. You must be so much fun, when was the last time you tried something new? Nothing will ever improve with your apathetic attitude.

Petr Hochbichler5:45 pm 04 Nov 24

They don’t resemble anything close to “communist” in any respect. Another fool who repeats other fools.

Capital Retro8:56 am 01 Nov 24

“More intense Weather Events…….”

More intense than what exactly? Like the “unprecedented” bushfires perhaps?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.