25 November 2024

Supermarkets check out on customers at our expense

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
7

Having fun? Sooo convenient. For the supermarket bottom line that is. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

We must be mugs. Not only are the big supermarkets making mega profits in a cost-of-living crisis, but they also keep outsourcing customer service to us.

Self-checkers are everywhere, bopping at us, talking to us, scraping our data and now even filming us.

Of course, they’re one reason why the virtual cash registers are ringing out across the share market, but the increasing loss of humans from the shopping equation is feeding stress levels and fanning consumer anger.

READ ALSO Social media ban for under-16s a step closer, but it’ll be a ‘difficult task’

A recent outing at Colesworths was marked by an absence of checkouts, and even the self-checking conveyor belt aisle was down, on a Saturday morning.

While many battle through the gauntlet of self-checkers with full trolleys, realistically, they are only good for a few items.

The systems even differ from chain to chain, leading to inevitable snafus as customers lose their way and have to flag staff to assist them.

This happens all the time.

A colleague recently had a scanning problem, and an attendant first watched a film of what had happened before fixing the issue. Isn’t that just a little too 1984?

A time and motion study might discover that if said staff member was on an actual checkout actually serving the customer it might just be a faster and less painful experience.

It would also be interesting to measure customers’ blood pressure as they negotiate the incessant beeping, AI-generated voices, and uncooperative scanners, all the while having to manage all manner of items and pack your own bags in a cramped space as humanity surges through with barely an acknowledgment.

The supermarkets are getting us to literally do the heavy lifting and charging us a fortune for the dubious pleasure.

For those few staff left at checkouts when they are operating, basic training seems to be optional.

How does one explain the nonsensical way some pack bags? Filling cooler bags up with non-perishables and vice versa. Putting cans on top of fruit or eggs. Or squeezing everything into a bag to the point that it can hardly be lifted.

READ ALSO Australians still trust their public services, says latest survey

Even then, some human interaction and handing over the checkout responsibility after a shop is preferable to combating the beeping monsters.

The problem is that this option is increasingly not available as managers run down their staffing in favour of automatons.

We are also too willing, too rushed, too well trained or just too damn tired to start screaming, “I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it any more!” (Google it!)

That doesn’t mean the frustration and anger isn’t there. We just take it with us.

But what if the supermarkets started thinking about their customers’ needs again, spent more on service than misleading advertising campaigns and tossed out the tech?

One can dream. More likely, they will find new, more efficient ways for customers to do their work. For free.

Join the conversation

7
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

On the one hand, high standards are good and that applies to cashiering, too. On the other, a human future is better than a robotic one, and that means having to accept, at times, poor or just poorer quality service, convenience, etc.

Should the supermarkets get rid of self-service checkouts? Yes. Should they provide good customer service at the other checkouts? Yes. Do we need to have a level of acceptance if they don’t? Yes. That’s what I think the equation is, more or less.

Call me a fan of humanity.

And as for those who pretend to love humanity the same – using “people are too dignified to be a cashier etc, so let’s replace humanity altogether with robots” – notice the seductiveness of their lies in that 1. they’re a snob who always did and always will look down on cashiers and the like; 2. people operate at different capacities and some are quite suited to cashier work, which is fine; 3. humans are WAY better than machines.

Do not fall for the subtle, seductive lies. An inhuman future will be inhuman, of course.

I’d rather use self serve, so I don’t get ripped off by an accidental double swipe or the wrong price. I use an app to add up the prices as I go

The self-serve checkouts suit me because I’m typically not pushing a trolley, and I buy little enough to be able to pack my bag/s in a smart way. That said, if I Was carrying a large load in a trolley then a checkout with a person and conveyor belt is essential for a stress-free experience.

Shops should be required to have a reasonable number of checkouts always open with people to help.

First you complain that you have to pack your own bags, then you complain if someone packs them differently to the way you’d like it done – which do you want? Oh yes, you want people on minimum wage, in a boring job, to do the packing just the way you want it. You put the items on the belt – put them on in the order you want them packed if you’re unwilling to do it yourself.

Unemployment is already low. I would rather scan and pack my own groceries, and have people employed doing jobs of greater value to them and to society. Do you still expect the person at the petrol station to run out and put the nozzle in your car? Or have you learned to cope with that huge impost on your time and energy?

I suffer from self-check-out rage. Loathe them. I actively seek out check-outs that have people.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.