13 December 2024

Union calls on ANU Vice-Chancellor to go after second job revealed

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
8
Distinguished Professor Genevieve Bell.

ANU Vice-Chancellor Professor Genevieve Bell had a paid role with tech giant Intel until 15 November 2024. Photo: Andrew Mears/ANU.

The tertiary education union is calling for ANU Vice-Chancellor Genevieve Bell to resign over her management decisions and after revelations she had a second job while leading the university.

If she does not go of her own accord, the union says the ANU Council should sack her.

A report in the Australian Financial Review said Professor Bell kept a paid role at technology giant Intel after joining the Australian National University (ANU) in 2017, including over the past 10 months since she became vice chancellor on a $1.1 million salary.

READ ALSO Labor promises greater access to early childhood education

Professor Bell, who is pushing to cut $250 million from ANU’s recurrent spending by early 2026 and who recently failed in a bid to get staff to forego a 2.5 per cent pay rise, only finished at Intel on 15 November.

In a gesture to staff as she urged them to forego a December pay rise, Professor Bell announced in October she would take a 10 per cent pay cut. More than 600 jobs are at risk from the cost-cutting program.

The AFR report also quoted S&P Global credit analyst Anthony Walker, who queried whether the ANU faced a financial crisis given its rich asset base and AA+ credit rating.

An ANU spokesperson said Professor Bell’s role at Intel was no secret and she continued to have the full support of the ANU Council.

“The source of media reporting on this is the university’s own website,” the spokesperson said.

“The arrangement was disclosed through our conflict processes in the normal way and was known by the council.

“It is common across universities for academics to work with external parties in their fields of expertise.”

The spokesperson said the ANU was obligated to use taxpayers’ money responsibly and selling assets to run deficits would be very poor practice.

“One of the key reasons we’ve been able to retain a strong credit rating is because ratings agencies can see we are committed to getting our budget back in order,” the spokesperson said.

But the National Tertiary Education Union said Professor Bell needed to go before she did any more damage to the ANU.

The union said it would conduct a vote of no confidence in Professor Bell in February if she stayed on.

READ ALSO Local innovation is why companies like Debbie’s take off

NTEU ACT Division secretary Dr Lachlan Clohesy said Professor Bell’s position was untenable after announcing damaging job cuts, the 88 per cent staff vote against her pay proposal, allegations about a culture of fear and intimidation and deans encouraged to resign, and now the second job with Intel while Vice-Chancellor.

“This farce has gone on long enough,” he said. “The ANU Council needs to act to stem the bleeding and mitigate the damage the Vice-Chancellor is doing to this great university.

“If the ANU Council failed to deal with this situation, it would be a clear abrogation of their responsibility to the university community.”

NTEU ANU Branch president Millan Pintos-Lopez said the Vice-Chancellor had alienated staff through all levels of the workforce.

“Our members have no confidence that she is the right person to lead ANU during these challenging times.”

Eleven ANU senior executives sent an email to all staff last Friday in support of Professor Bell and the college deans.

Join the conversation

8
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Canberra Engineer12:08 pm 14 Dec 24

Every indication since her appointment has been she wouldn’t be a 100% VC like previous ones. The org chart shows a substantial change in reporting lines, with barely anyone directly reporting to the VC now and instead to the Provost. She has this Intel side hustle, and continues to do academic writing and field work. And she can’t find the time to do even a regular VC’s blog, perhaps the easiest way in which to connect with your staff and establish your vision for the place.

The result is silence, ambivalence, and the first real dialogue with staff being largely one way and about sacking people. You might have inherited a bad balance sheet, you might have inherited the poor decisions of previous members of the Council and Executive. But wow, talk about making all of that harder than it has to be.

Craig Applegate3:46 am 14 Dec 24

At the University of Canberra, full-time academic staff who hold a second paid job are sacked for serious misconduct.

The 10% pay cut still leaves her with a salary that is far larger than her predecessor.

First the CIT CEO’s well remunerated misconduct and now this behaviour at the ANU. What is it about the people in power at our places of higher learning? The fish well and truly rots from the head, but both boards appear blissfully ignorant or are corrupt in not rooting out this type of wrongdoing. The VC needs to go and with her both ANU and CIT boards should follow her out the door. In the mean time does anyone give two hoots about the students and staff?

This article does not say what the role was. A ‘paid role’ could include being a director (e.g. non-executive director) or on an advisory committee which has a relatively small impost over the year.

The vice-Chancellor’s taking a pay cut of 10% doesn’t sound so noble when she has another, very lucrative, source of income. Yet she tried to persuade staff to take a pay cut, when that’s all they’re earning. Doesn’t pass the sniff test. Time to go.

“It is common across universities for academics to work with external parties in their fields of expertise…” Well maybe she should take an academic’s salary then?

She’s not an academic, she’s a Vice Chancellor getting paid over a million dollars a year. The nerve of this person! The total weakness of the Council that allowed this disgrace!

These thieves artificially peg their bloated salaries to private sector CEOs then avoid all notions of accountability and constraints that come with the CEO role. Can you imagine an ASX CEO on +$1million per year taking a side job with a giant global corporation? The board would sack them in short order. How can this person look herself in the mirror? Accountability now please!

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.