13 March 2020

ACT election battle looms over Labor's landmark Wellbeing Framework

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
23
Andrew Barr

Chief Minister Andrew Barr at UC Lake Ginninderra College: the Wellbeing Framework will be Labor’s approach to government. Photos: Ian Bushnell.

Election battle lines have been drawn over the ACT’s new Wellbeing Framework, with Chief Minister Andrew Barr calling the Australian-first initiative a clear example of how Labor will approach governing and the Opposition rejecting it out of hand as a feel-good exercise.

The product of recent consultation with the ACT community, the Framework consists of 12 domains, with their own wellbeing indicators, considered to be the most important areas for measuring quality of life in Canberra. They will guide government decision-making, from the framing of budgets to policy development and spending priorities.

Launching the Framework, Mr Barr said it was designed so government could move beyond the traditional economic measures of performance to give it a much broader view of community needs, provide a holistic basis for decision-making and contribute to more collaborative, multi-agency approach to resolving issues.

But any chance of bipartisan support for the Framework and it surviving a Liberal victory in October has been quickly dashed with a short statement from the Opposition.

“The Liberals will make Canberra the best place to live, work and raise a family by focusing on better outcomes and lower taxes. The Government’s new framework is nothing but a feel-good exercise that lacks substance,” it said.

But Mr Barr argues the Framework will be all about outcomes, and it will be another point of difference come October.

“What I am being clear about now many, many months before the election is the Framework and approach to government that we will adopt if we are fortunate to be elected later in the year,” he said.

Mr Barr admitted there was always a risk governments of a different persuasion might not retain the Framework but that was not a reason not to do it.

“Once you put something down and prove that it will work it becomes harder for people to just throw it away without any thought,” he said.

But there are risks to wedding the Framework to the election timetable, bedding down a complex process before it may be ready.

Mr Barr said the Framework has been a couple of years in the making but the actual consultation only started last July.

The ACT Framework has been modelled on the New Zealand approach and the Government had worked with both the NSW and Victorian governments in its development.

While the Canberra Liberals might be dismissive, Mr Barr said other jurisdictions and countries were heading down this path.

The key will be the data the Framework and its indicators will provide, some of it from existing sources such as the Australian Bureau of Statistics, but new information will need to be collected and crunched.

“These indicators will provide a rich source of data for the community to measure our progress over years ahead,” Mr Barr said.

He said the Framework would contribute to the development of medium and long-term policy settings that ”would seek to shift the dial” in areas where the ACT was not performing as well the community would like.

Mr Barr pointed to the responses forced upon governments by disaster and disease as practical examples of how this new, holistic approach would be beneficial.

”I think you will see the value of wellbeing indicators at this time when governments locally, nationally and internationally are looking beyond just pure economic metrics to instigate either stimulus packages, or recovery packages or public health support,” he said.

Dr Emma Campbell

Dr Emma Campbell: government will be held to account.

Mr Barr said the Framework would guide areas such as procurement so local firms will benefit, and infrastructure, which could be used to drive a ”multi-pronged outcome that improves wellbeing in a number of different indicators”.

He saw benefits in breaking down silos, agencies working together more and developing partnerships with the non-government sector to deliver services.

“It will force government and agencies to be more outcomes-focused,” he said.

Mr Barr acknowledged that clashes of interests would remain, such as between economic growth and the environment.

“The challenges don’t go away but this gives a framework with which to balance those competing priorities, gives a richer set of data to inform decision making and will give people a sense that when we are prioritising improving an outcome in an area we hope it would not have a negative impact on others,” he said.

“But not every policy decision can deliver every possible policy outcome that you want.”

The ACT Council of Social Service (ACTCOSS), which was closely involved in the development of the Wellbeing Framework, welcomed its release but also said government would be held to account if it did not adhere to it.

“This has resulted in a set of domains and indicators that the whole community can take ownership of and hold the Government accountable to,” CEO Dr Emma Campbell said.

But she would be disappointed with the Opposition’s stance, after saying she hoped the Framework would be embraced by all sides of politics.

“We welcome the attention that the ACT Wellbeing Framework gives to specific groups in our community whose wellbeing may be hidden by standard economic measures,” she said.

“ACTCOSS has long highlighted the disadvantage hidden behind the ACT’s high averages on most standard measures. The Framework pays close attention to inequality in all its forms.”

To learn more about the ACT Wellbeing Framework and its indicators, visit www.act.gov.au/wellbeing.

Join the conversation

23
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
Latest
Capital Retro8:29 am 16 Mar 20

It was nonsense in New Zealand and it will be the same here.

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/382877/govt-s-wellbeing-budget-labelled-nonsense

I think this is a wonderful initiative and about time. There is nothing arrogant, secretive and detached from reality in this proposal. There are plenty of other countries who collect well-being statistics in guiding government decision making. ABS has been talking about collecting well-being statistics for years but has not got anywhere with lack of government funding for such a project. People and young people living in remote areas, people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage, people at risk of homelessness, people who are long term versus short term unemployed, people with or without educational qualifications – the list goes on.

Yes some good points you raise. Let’s hope like the ABS and other countries the input data is released to the public.

The issue with the ACT Government over the last decade is that too often only cherry picked data is being released.

I’m concerned that this government has a track record in either wilfully or ineptly analysing data to suit their agendas.

From the Health system to Education and Public Transport, the list goes on.

All the input data for the Wellbeing Framework MUST be made fully open and publicly available for proper scrutiny. Otherwise the measurement is absolutely worthless

We can’t find out once again that the measurements and findings are based on cherry picking data items to suit or poor quality data analysis.

More weasel words from a government long past its used by date.

HiddenDragon9:01 pm 13 Mar 20

”would seek to shift the dial” “multi-pronged outcome…..” “breaking down silos” “be more outcomes-focused”

After more than 6,700 days in power (I’ve counted) this is what we get from an arrogant, secretive government which would need the aid of a very large search party to find the bleeding obvious – more jargon, more cliches, more glossy publications which are seriously detached from reality, and much more lovely, lucrative busywork for ratepayer funded consultants and back-office bureaucrats.

This is a gimmick – it’s re-hashing issues which have been around for (many) years, and pretending that it should be taken seriously as an issue in the October election is a major insult to the intelligence of Canberra voters.

privatepublic5:55 am 05 May 20

Funny this government has been in power almost as long as Putin has. Canberra has regressed, the Russians have somewhat progressed (not in the usual USSR/act gov fashion of stating progress).

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.