Skip to content Skip to main navigation

ACT election battle looms over Labor’s landmark Wellbeing Framework

Ian Bushnell 13 March 2020 27
Andrew Barr

Chief Minister Andrew Barr at UC Lake Ginninderra College: the Wellbeing Framework will be Labor’s approach to government. Photos: Ian Bushnell.

Election battle lines have been drawn over the ACT’s new Wellbeing Framework, with Chief Minister Andrew Barr calling the Australian-first initiative a clear example of how Labor will approach governing and the Opposition rejecting it out of hand as a feel-good exercise.

The product of recent consultation with the ACT community, the Framework consists of 12 domains, with their own wellbeing indicators, considered to be the most important areas for measuring quality of life in Canberra. They will guide government decision-making, from the framing of budgets to policy development and spending priorities.

Launching the Framework, Mr Barr said it was designed so government could move beyond the traditional economic measures of performance to give it a much broader view of community needs, provide a holistic basis for decision-making and contribute to more collaborative, multi-agency approach to resolving issues.

But any chance of bipartisan support for the Framework and it surviving a Liberal victory in October has been quickly dashed with a short statement from the Opposition.

“The Liberals will make Canberra the best place to live, work and raise a family by focusing on better outcomes and lower taxes. The Government’s new framework is nothing but a feel-good exercise that lacks substance,” it said.

But Mr Barr argues the Framework will be all about outcomes, and it will be another point of difference come October.

“What I am being clear about now many, many months before the election is the Framework and approach to government that we will adopt if we are fortunate to be elected later in the year,” he said.

Mr Barr admitted there was always a risk governments of a different persuasion might not retain the Framework but that was not a reason not to do it.

“Once you put something down and prove that it will work it becomes harder for people to just throw it away without any thought,” he said.

But there are risks to wedding the Framework to the election timetable, bedding down a complex process before it may be ready.

Mr Barr said the Framework has been a couple of years in the making but the actual consultation only started last July.

The ACT Framework has been modelled on the New Zealand approach and the Government had worked with both the NSW and Victorian governments in its development.

While the Canberra Liberals might be dismissive, Mr Barr said other jurisdictions and countries were heading down this path.

The key will be the data the Framework and its indicators will provide, some of it from existing sources such as the Australian Bureau of Statistics, but new information will need to be collected and crunched.

“These indicators will provide a rich source of data for the community to measure our progress over years ahead,” Mr Barr said.

He said the Framework would contribute to the development of medium and long-term policy settings that ”would seek to shift the dial”  in areas where the ACT was not performing as well the community would like.

Mr Barr pointed to the responses forced upon governments by disaster and disease as practical examples of how this new, holistic approach would be beneficial.

”I think you will see the value of wellbeing indicators at this time when governments locally, nationally and internationally are looking beyond just pure economic metrics to instigate either stimulus packages, or recovery packages or public health support,” he said.

Dr Emma Campbell

Dr Emma Campbell: government will be held to account.

Mr Barr said the Framework would guide areas such as procurement so local firms will benefit, and infrastructure, which could be used to drive a ”multi-pronged outcome that improves wellbeing in a number of different indicators”.

He saw benefits in breaking down silos, agencies working together more and developing partnerships with the non-government sector to deliver services.

“It will force government and agencies to be more outcomes-focused,” he said.

Mr Barr acknowledged that clashes of interests would remain, such as between economic growth and the environment.

“The challenges don’t go away but this gives a framework with which to balance those competing priorities, gives a richer set of data to inform decision making and will give people a sense that when we are prioritising improving an outcome in an area we hope it would not have a negative impact on others,” he said.

“But not every policy decision can deliver every possible policy outcome that you want.”

The ACT Council of Social Service (ACTCOSS), which was closely involved in the development of the Wellbeing Framework, welcomed its release but also said government would be held to account if it did not adhere to it.

“This has resulted in a set of domains and indicators that the whole community can take ownership of and hold the Government accountable to,” CEO Dr Emma Campbell said.

But she would be disappointed with the Opposition’s stance, after saying she hoped the Framework would be embraced by all sides of politics.

“We welcome the attention that the ACT Wellbeing Framework gives to specific groups in our community whose wellbeing may be hidden by standard economic measures,” she said.

“ACTCOSS has long highlighted the disadvantage hidden behind the ACT’s high averages on most standard measures. The Framework pays close attention to inequality in all its forms.”

To learn more about the ACT Wellbeing Framework and its indicators, visit www.act.gov.au/wellbeing.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
27 Responses to ACT election battle looms over Labor’s landmark Wellbeing Framework
Capital Retro Capital Retro 8:29 am 16 Mar 20

It was nonsense in New Zealand and it will be the same here.

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/382877/govt-s-wellbeing-budget-labelled-nonsense

Raewyn Bastion Raewyn Bastion 10:41 pm 14 Mar 20

Sounds like everyone is going wellness

Joesephine Beckett Joesephine Beckett 4:26 pm 14 Mar 20

I think the well being framework sounds great. I love the light rail too 😀

kim2614 kim2614 3:58 pm 14 Mar 20

I think this is a wonderful initiative and about time. There is nothing arrogant, secretive and detached from reality in this proposal. There are plenty of other countries who collect well-being statistics in guiding government decision making. ABS has been talking about collecting well-being statistics for years but has not got anywhere with lack of government funding for such a project. People and young people living in remote areas, people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage, people at risk of homelessness, people who are long term versus short term unemployed, people with or without educational qualifications – the list goes on.

    bj_ACT bj_ACT 3:41 pm 15 Mar 20

    Yes some good points you raise. Let’s hope like the ABS and other countries the input data is released to the public.

    The issue with the ACT Government over the last decade is that too often only cherry picked data is being released.

bj_ACT bj_ACT 12:11 pm 14 Mar 20

I’m concerned that this government has a track record in either wilfully or ineptly analysing data to suit their agendas.

From the Health system to Education and Public Transport, the list goes on.

All the input data for the Wellbeing Framework MUST be made fully open and publicly available for proper scrutiny. Otherwise the measurement is absolutely worthless

We can’t find out once again that the measurements and findings are based on cherry picking data items to suit or poor quality data analysis.

Suzanne Suzanne Suzanne Suzanne 10:43 am 14 Mar 20

Maybe ACT Housing could stop dipping into maintenance payments at the rate of 25% and give low income families some "wellness' that way. It's not earnings, it's money for the child...

    Frank Booth Frank Booth 3:40 pm 14 Mar 20

    I don't understand.

    Suzanne Suzanne Suzanne Suzanne 6:35 pm 15 Mar 20

    Frank Booth Okay. When you live in an ACT Housing property they calculate rent on your earnings, whether that be welfare payments or whatever AND any child maintenance payments a person gets. That money is for the betterment of the child, not to dip into for extra revenue for ACT Government. People struggle enough as it is after a relationship breakdown and to do this, is as they say, legal, but morally repulsive.

noid noid 10:07 am 14 Mar 20

More weasel words from a government long past its used by date.

Michael Ahern Michael Ahern 7:30 am 14 Mar 20

Don’t need a well-being framework to work out that Canberra has the longest hospital waiting times, highest rates, highest car rego fees..... Our well-being would be vastly improved if the ACT Govt spent less time developing propaganda and more time doing their job.

Mark Sandell Mark Sandell 5:31 am 14 Mar 20

Does the Wellbeing policy include selling out Gungahlin to the apartment developers?

    Michael Ahern Michael Ahern 10:55 am 14 Mar 20

    Mark Sandell that’s the developers Well-being strategy

Nick Anderson Nick Anderson 10:15 pm 13 Mar 20

More spin from both sides, what a surprise. #electionyear

HiddenDragon HiddenDragon 9:01 pm 13 Mar 20

”would seek to shift the dial” “multi-pronged outcome…..” “breaking down silos” “be more outcomes-focused”

After more than 6,700 days in power (I’ve counted) this is what we get from an arrogant, secretive government which would need the aid of a very large search party to find the bleeding obvious – more jargon, more cliches, more glossy publications which are seriously detached from reality, and much more lovely, lucrative busywork for ratepayer funded consultants and back-office bureaucrats.

This is a gimmick – it’s re-hashing issues which have been around for (many) years, and pretending that it should be taken seriously as an issue in the October election is a major insult to the intelligence of Canberra voters.

Christina Raymond Christina Raymond 8:45 pm 13 Mar 20

I support the new wellbeing framework. Basically it's mandating data capture and routine consideration of that data as an evidence base in making policy decisions. Not that controversial. If this wasn't an election year, it strikes me as something that could have been rolled out administratively and fairly quietly, just as many policy decision-making frameworks are.

Alexandra Hughes Alexandra Hughes 8:40 pm 13 Mar 20

We'll be paying for that tram until we die or leave, now they want to add more. I'm all for wellbeing but how about we reduce the number of politicians in the ACT and use that money elsewhere. If he had any brains he'd know our wellbeing was low because of the cost of living in the ACT. 😥

    Rob Thomas Rob Thomas 9:15 pm 13 Mar 20

    Alexandra Hughes what are you talking about? Does Sydney pay for the up keep of the bridge? Maybe. So they should get rid of it? The roads? Narh who needs them? Hospitals? Dump them!

    Robyn Holder Robyn Holder 9:26 pm 13 Mar 20

    Alexandra Hughes how about since you love Liberals so much you move to glorious and self destructing NSW.

    Daniel J. Fitzpatrick Daniel J. Fitzpatrick 9:32 pm 13 Mar 20

    Mark Huppert hey mate, don’t come in here talking sense and facts that just won’t fly around here!

    Alexandra Hughes Alexandra Hughes 5:56 am 14 Mar 20

    Robyn Holder never said such a thing, how dare vyou.

    Alexandra Hughes Alexandra Hughes 6:01 am 14 Mar 20

    Rob Thomas really, thats your argument? Sydney harbour bridgevhas been paid for by millions of people 20 years ago. So it took over 50 years of millions of tolls. How are 50p,000 going to pay for an expensive piece of infrastructure like that when the ACT cant afford to improve other services.

    Alexandra Hughes Alexandra Hughes 9:05 am 14 Mar 20

    Chris Cross i could care less about the whole Labor Liberal garbage. I dont support ridiculously expensive projects when other services are barely functioning or keeping up with demand. I am not wedded to any political party. Im interested in the best overall outcome with limited resources.

    Rob Thomas Rob Thomas 10:58 am 14 Mar 20

    Alexandra Hughes so how will we be paying for the tram 'forever' - it's wildly popular.

    And is there no maintenance on the bridge?

    Andrea Lloyd Andrea Lloyd 4:14 pm 14 Mar 20

    Alexandra Hughes it’s called infrastructure spending and the construction phase adds $$$ to the economy. Results in better transport options for Canberra and less congestion and pollution during peak hour.

    Alexandra Hughes Alexandra Hughes 4:26 pm 14 Mar 20

    Andrea Lloyd again, there was existing infrastructure in place that could have been improved and that money spent on other critical projects cre a ting just as many jobs. But where are those jobs now that construction is over. Small local population with limited tax payer funds available, those funds have to be prioritised.

Chris MacDonald Chris MacDonald 8:35 pm 13 Mar 20

My well-being would be improved by a reduction in rates and land tax, thanks

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2020 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | riotact.com.cn | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site