Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Opinion

Canberra’s Leading
Relationship Lawyers

Architecture, Common Ground & Pushing The Boundaries

By Paul Costigan - 7 June 2017 2

Part of the local debates about the future of the Dickson parklands has been the introduction into the conversations that the government intends to demolish the Northside Community Centre to build an apartment tower along the lines of Common Ground in Gungahlin.

Given the years of trickery around the future of the Parklands, people quite rightly feel as though a great initiative is being misused to gain another political point.

So what is Common Ground – and should another be built on the Dickson Parklands?

There were two episodes of Pushing The Boundaries recently screened on local Prime TV – they are now available on YouTube: Click here for episode One – and here for Episode Two.

It was marketed as a program about architecture, and along the way there was indeed some architecture of interest.

The reality was that it was a program without a strong focus on debating architecture and was more about promoting the work of chosen architects and developers. It was more of a lifestyle program – rather than an architecture program.

The surprise was that the program honoured Common Ground in Gungahlin as the number one example of architecture.

This was puzzling given that the building is not great architecture especially when viewed alongside others in the program (eg VIBE Hotel Canberra Airport).

Having said that – there is absolutely no doubt that Common Ground is a fabulous initiative and very successful. I was just not convinced that being so ‘worthy’ was an indicator of the best architecture in Canberra.

Having visited Common Ground and been shown around the inside of building and one of the apartments, this is an initiative that has been a long time coming.

There should be many more such buildings (with better architecture) across all parts of Canberra – and in a fairer world, there should have been several planned to be situated along the redeveloped Northbourne corridor.

The living standards offered by Common Ground reflect a humane way to look after those not so advantaged. They provide a boost that allows people to get their act together and to seek opportunities that may see them move out and start their lives over again.

So back to my question – should a Common Ground be built on the Dickson Parklands.

The answer is maybe.

What is missing is any sort of planning for the whole site and even more – any precinct planning to show how this site sits within the ever-changing surrounding suburbs – Dickson, Downer, Ainslie Hackett, Watson, Lyneham etc.

There is no doubt that at least several Common Ground buildings should by now be situated across the inner north – but where would depend on there being planning in place that should have identified a host of opportunities and requirements.

This is what is missing – planning – be it master planning, precinct planning or whatever.

This level of planning just does not happen – and yet various agencies keep wanting to plonk things, both good and bad, onto sites with no planning and with no real attempt at open and honest community engagement.

To reiterate: My view is there is definitely a place for Common Ground initiatives across the inner suburbs. Except for the very ordinary external architecture, and the weird placement on the edge of vast paddocks, the Gungahlin Common Ground is a great example of what could be repeated in most areas throughout Canberra.

I hope that this government can stop using such overdue initiatives to complicate debates about the future of important assets such as the Dickson Parklands; the term Parklands refers to a site that has an abundance of greenery, some open spaces and a mix of community and cultural facilities.

To the Ministers concerned – please get this right and bring the residents along with you instead of trying to play tricks to get such overdue and wonderful things done.

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
2 Responses to
Architecture, Common Ground & Pushing The Boundaries
Holden Caulfield 12:14 pm 07 Jun 17

Again, you tell us this is bad architecture, without telling us why?

Is it just that you don’t like the look? If so, that doesn’t make it bad architecture. There is so much more to it than that.

Similarly, you say Common Ground in Section 72 might be a good idea so long as it’s planned. Please expand on what you planning decisions you would like to see for Section 72 that would make a Common Ground development acceptable to you.

Mark_Dando 10:16 am 07 Jun 17

Maybe just maybe the people who commissioned and designed the Common Ground ‘tower’ in Gungahlin have a better idea of the needs of prospective residents than you. I’ve stayed in the Vibe Hotel at the airport a number of times. Great to look at, but but the central atrium means the rooms can be noisy and the ground floor common areas hard to heat.

And only in Canberra would a 5 floor building be described as a tower. Apparently I now live in a tower. Am gradually getting my head around the local meaning of terms such as:
multistory = 2 floors
high-rise = 3 or more floors

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site