Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Skilled legal advice with
accessible & personal attention

Bomber’s dismissal review dismissed

By Joe Canberran - 25 January 2008 3

ABC online line has here one of the best opening lines I’ve read for a while in describing the the Federal Court’s finding in convicted letter bomber Colin George Dunstan’s unfair dismissal claim against the ATO, the reason he went on a letter bombing campaign back in 1998.

I wonder, given he is currently out on parole after 7 years in jail for how he reacted last time he got some bad news, how he will take this?

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
3 Responses to
Bomber’s dismissal review dismissed
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
I-filed 9:16 pm 25 Jan 08

John Terrence Conway and the chilling Anu Singh are both a thousand times worse than Dunstan. “Notorious litigist” would have been better .He’s more of Eastman’s ilk.

Deano 9:06 pm 25 Jan 08

Another legal chapter in the long running case of one of Canberra’s most notorious criminals has come to a close.

notorious – having an exceedingly bad reputation; Generally known and talked of by the public usually in an unfavorable sense.

I would have thought he was more a nutter than a notorious criminal. Mind you, I can’t think of any other notorious criminals operating in Canberra, so I’ll suppose he’ll have to do.

Headbone 8:46 pm 25 Jan 08

Now what was that rap song?……Things that make you go Boom or Hmmmmmm??????

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site