Skip to content Skip to main navigation


Home loans made clear

Community Councils call for formalised roles – please let it not be so

By johnboy 19 September 2005 6

Following on from earlier news about an 18 storey development in Belconnen, the ABC brings news that the Belconnen Community Council now wants a formal say in planning decisions.

The Belconnen Community Council is calling on the ACT Government to establish community reference groups to ensure residents have a say in local planning and development issues.

Unless the Electoral Commission is going to govern election to these bodies I say PLEASE GOD NO!

Another layer of self-important and unaccountable busybodies sucking on the public teat is the last thing we need.

What we need are simple zoning parameters under which approval would be the default position for developments that meet those parameters.

What’s Your opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
6 Responses to
Community Councils call for formalised roles – please let it not be so
Showing only Website comments
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Thumper 12:18 pm 20 Sep 05

Agreed that community consultation should be easy, but apparently it isn’t, as amply demonstrated in the Ginninderra School fiasco.

bonfire 12:04 pm 20 Sep 05

community councils are so undemocratic it is not funny.

also they are heavily infiltrated by the ALP. look at the BCC, the current president is a former ALP assembly candidate!

in a town of this size proper community consultation should be easily done, but it isnt.

thank you majority govt.

Thumper 10:17 am 20 Sep 05

Thanks Chris,

I am not against it in principle, and I agree that Corbell has appeared to have gone off the rails.

You will note that I did suggest that tyhere has to be a degree of community consultation.

Whether this is the right way or not I do not know.


Spitfire3 9:54 am 20 Sep 05

A reasonable point of view.

Chris S 9:28 am 20 Sep 05

Thumper and johnboy,

Once upon a time, there used to exist the sort of consultative bodies that the BCC is calling for; they were called Local Area Planning Advisory Committees (LAPACs). These were established in areas that were subject to high levels of redevelopment pressure, and provided some checks and balances on the depredations of developers, and the (not inconsequential) incompetence of planning authorities (just look at the ACT AAT site to see how badly they regularly stuff up on decisions).

The LAPACs were made up of resident representatives (some drawn from residents’ associations, others not), developer and business representatives and Ministerial nominees.

These worked quite well – some problems were apparent, largely because of the volume of redevelopment in some areas and hence workloads were very high.

What they were able to do was bring a community focus to what was happening within an area prior to a development application being lodged. Not least, they were an opportunity for people to know what was going on, ask questions, (sometimes)influence the outcomes, and get used to the idea. In many cases, the developers were able to either convince residents of the value of the proposal, or were able to modify it to reduce the impact. When the development proposal was then lodged, the number of objections and appeals were far fewer.

Corbell in his wisdom abolished the LAPACs, promising to replace them with an alternative. He came up with a plan that was universally rejected, so he spat the dummy and has done nothing to put in place a community-based structure to advise on planning matters.

Instead, he has given this role to the Community Councils, which were never set up to review planning matters (particularly suburban developments), don’t have the expertise that the LAPACs had, and in any event are only invited to review a small selection of proposals, after the DA is lodged. This latter point is quite important – it is during the pre-application phase that changes can be quite quickly and easily incorprated. Once the DA is lodged, the only input from affected residents is through objections and appeals.

Any ability of residents to influence developments in the pre-application stage has been destroyed by Corbell – hence this idea again being floated by the BCC.

Chris Shelling
Garran Community Association
(Former) Member, (former) Burley Griffin LAPAC

Thumper 7:51 am 20 Sep 05

Well, we do want, and need consultation, however, the last thing we want is another level of pseudo government in this territory.

Geez, nothing would ever get done.

Instead we need a genuine attempt by the government to consult with residents and shopowners, okay, public service speak hear, stakeholders, and then listen and act upon their concerns.

We don’t need some power hungry little consultative group that guides government policy.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | | |

Search across the site