17 January 2023

George Pell's death should force a new conversation

| Ross Solly
Join the conversation
21
Cardinal George Pell's appeal against child sex abuse charges has been dismissed by the Victorian Court of Appeals.

The late Cardinal George Pell remains a polarising figure. Photo: Facebook.

Reading, watching and listening to coverage on the sudden and unexpected death last week of Cardinal George Pell it was hard to believe they were all talking about the same person.

In death, as in life, Cardinal Pell was a polarising figure. And in death, as in life, the media drew their line in the sand and refused to cross. Surely they couldn’t all be right? Those who wrote (and it was almost exclusively in one print media outlet) glowingly of the life and legacy of Cardinal Pell pinned their coverage around the unanimous High Court decision quashing all charges against Australia’s most senior Catholic.

They conveniently ignored the findings of the Royal Commission into Institutional Response to Child Sexual Abuse, which was headed by former NSW Supreme Court justice Peter McClellan KC.

The commission raised serious questions about Pell’s knowledge of child sexual abuse cases while he was a priest, a bishop and an archbishop in Ballarat, Melbourne and Sydney over two decades from the mid-70s to the mid-90s.

In a damning report, the Commissioner found large slabs of Pell’s evidence difficult to believe. The commissioner found some of his testimony to be implausible, other evidence to be inconceivable. It was not an easy read for Pell’s supporters, and especially those in the media.

READ ALSO 20 years on from 2003 disaster, council’s bushfire warning must be heeded

Rather than accept the findings, supporters set about trying to discredit the royal commission. One of the arguments was that the inquiry was unfairly focused on the Catholic Church. While this may well have been the case, it doesn’t lessen the impact of the Commissioner’s findings.

And then on the other side of the coverage of Pell’s passing, the commentators who still refuse to accept the unanimous verdict of the High Court, preferring to focus exclusively on the findings of the royal commission.

The High Court verdict should have ended the argument once and for all surrounding the charges Pell faced. But just like Pell supporters refuse to accept he was asleep at the wheel while child sexual abuse cases were occurring under his watch, Pell’s enemies refuse to accept that the Catholic Cardinal was not a pedophile.

I am not a Catholic. I’m an atheist. So I am not qualified at all to comment on how the Catholic Church is being run, on whether it is still in 2023 relevant or whether it is badly in need of an overhaul.

But it’s obvious George Pell was very uncomfortable with the changes the church was making to try to keep apace with a community that was embracing issues like same-sex marriage and abortion.

READ ALSO Despite the naysayers, sending a former PM to Washington is a smart move

The opposing arguments about Pell’s innocence or guilt will continue forever. The issues he raised in an anonymous memo about the pace of change in the Catholic Church need to be debated now.

According to Census figures, the number of Catholics in Australia has been slowly dropping in recent years. Years of sex abuse scandals have taken their toll, but the Pell memo should spark another discussion on how the Catholic Church can hold on to its current members, and even attract new believers.

Many of those who have walked away from the Church believe it was leaders like Pell who were bringing it down. Francis Sullivan was appointed by the Catholic Church as CEO of the Truth, Justice and Healing Council, formed to coordinate the church’s response to the Royal Commission’s findings.

He recently became Chair of Concerned Catholics Canberra Goulburn, a group concerned the church is no longer meaningful to Australians in the 21st century.

“His (Pell’s) brand of Catholicism has proved to be unpopular and alienating to most Australians,” Sullivan said.

The death of George Pell has forced into the open a discussion on where the Catholic Church is at in 2023, and where it is headed.

Join the conversation

21
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
Latest

Ross Solly, disappointed you did not research or if you did, you omitted the continual cover ups of the Catholic Church globally. Along with the accusations Pell himself is a peodophile. “glowing accolades” many came from other white men in positions of power… I personally found it sickening. As we know, with grooming there is always a power in balance… but hey suffer the little children

All religions are weird and they should all be banned. Get rid of religious clothing too (particularly the type men force women to wear), as I find it very offensive. I’d like a Royal Commission into that. However, the High Court of Australia (the highest court in the land) acquitted Pell. So he was judged by the highest courts and found to be not guilty. Unless you want ‘mob’ justice and want to ignore the rulings of the courts; I guess that’s what’s the loony ‘cancel culture’ push for – mob justice based on their own personal views. If you are not happy with the High Court outcome, well I guess you will be judged one day by the almighty God who knows exactly what you did (or did not do)…

We clearly need a better education system.

The pell case and the NT case clearly show problems with having poltical interference in the justice system of the states.

There was clearly not enough evidence, and time had lapsed so long that a key person for the defence had died.

Justice seems more like a popular vote than a process.

SigmaOctantis10:20 pm 17 Jan 23

It’d be great if just once you wrote an article that didn’t take the politically correct line on whatever topic it was. Blaming white men for everything doesn’t help the world but does mean you get zero complaints.

Ross has the balance right here. Pell was a doctrinaire and rigid catholic theologian and indifferent to the sufferings of abuse victims. On the other hand he was clearly the victim of egregious court case. My sense is that the Catholic church is unlikely to recover its former status and authority while it remains rigid and uncompromising.

Daniel O'Connell5:58 pm 17 Jan 23

One thing we can all agree Ross is you are sure “not qualified at all to comment on how the Catholic Church is being run.” Interesting the findings of the Royal Commission did not lead to any charges being brought against Pell, even thought this is a red hot issue and the authorities have brought “failure to act” charges against others.

As a Catholic, I agree with Ross’ view about the need for a more active conversation within the Australian church about its direction in modern Australia – and the challenge of both relevance and integrity within a secular, self-obsessed society. But surely the very public failures of justice in both the Victorian Pell case and the ACT’s own Lehrmann case poses the question of the politicisation of our justice system and what needs to be done with this pillar of the western democratic system.

Good article Ross. The Pell apologists wilfully ignore the failure of Pell to deal with known paedophile priests despite repeated requests to do so. They also ignore the cruel & callous way he dealt with victims and their families when they met with him.

Stephen Saunders10:38 am 17 Jan 23

Ostentatious next step, interment, slap in the middle of Sydney.

Tells you everything you need to know, about their real level of contrition.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.