2 April 2019

Katy Gallagher on why the Senate matters and rediscovering her mojo

| Genevieve Jacobs
Join the conversation

Katy Gallagher. Photo: George Tsotsos.

Katy Gallagher is an unlikely advocate for taking a year off politics, but on the eve of a Federal election campaign, she believes her enforced sabbatical has done her good.

The former ACT senator lost her seat in 2017 when she fell foul of Section 44 of the Constitution after referring herself to the High Court. She’s spent the year working on health policy for Calvary and while initially devastated at the result, she nevertheless says there’s been real value in “watching issues flow, observing how the government is operating, and taking some time to pick up different skills”.

Gallagher says that feedback from the Canberra community was a substantial motivating factor in her decision to re-nominate. “If I hadn’t had that I would have walked away. Everyone’s replaceable, I know I’m not the only one who can do the job. But Penny Wong said to me, ‘we might rail against the party, but who is around the table matters’.

“That resonated with me in terms of what I could do for my community. I love Canberra, that’s what’s motivated me from the get-go in ACT and Federal politics.”

Gallagher says she’d worked hard to attain senior positions in the Labor Caucus as manager of opposition business, a member of the Senate leadership team and a shadow cabinet member. “I felt that for the first time in a long time whether we were in government or opposition, Canberra would have a voice at that table.

“That matters when they’re talking about the public service and cutting jobs. Canberra is not high on people’s list of priorities, whereas a Canberran seat at that table can give us a real voice. The public service is our BHP. If you attack it, it’s not just the arms of government but a whole community.”

But how much of her agenda is Canberran and how much is Labor policy? Traditionally there’s precious little regard for Canberra, both because it’s a safe Labor electorate and there are so many votes to be won elsewhere by Canberra bashing. Would she be prepared, for example, to cross the floor as Gary Humphries famously did in the interests of the electorate?

The answer is yes, but with some qualifications. Gallagher says that if the Territory had voted against marriage equality, for example, she could not have followed suit. “I’ve agonised over this,” she says, “but my answer is that I would have been upfront about it. I wouldn’t have said I’d go with the community and then abstain. I couldn’t operate like that. But I am Canberran through and through – I think it would be unusual for me to disagree with the majority of the place that’s made me who I am.”

What about the risks of Labor incumbency, both Federally and locally? Surely that also means that nobody really gets independent, wholly Canberra-focused representation when the vote doesn’t change, term upon term?

Gallagher denies that’s the case, arguing that Labor’s commitment to a full policy agenda is often very good for the city’s economy. She also points to the $200 million funding promise for Stage 2 light rail, comparing it to the funding that made the Majura Parkway possible. Similar decisions, she says, will be made on the basis of whether they are nation-building infrastructure.

And, she says, complacency is dangerous. “I grew up on Hare-Clark campaigning where you’ve got ten voters, three out of ten will vote for Labor or Liberals, and you’ve got to find a way to persuade the other four to support you. It’s a marginal seat approach and that’s how I approach it in the Senate. I take nothing for granted.”

Gallagher considered putting her hand up for the new Lower House seat of Bean, but says her priority has been to serve where she’s most useful. “I come from the Assembly which tends to be a minority government. I have a lot of experience negotiating with cross benches which is key for the Senate.

“I have extensive legislative skills, and the Senate is where the amendments are made and where the debates have been had in recent years. If you want Canberra’s interest represented on Territory rights, and matters like marriage equality, your representation there matters.”

And on how it feels to get back into the political swing, she says, “So far, so good. I’m finding my mojo.”

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
Capital Retro8:40 am 30 Apr 19

Investigation required into how and where she obtained email addresses that she is now sending unsolicited election material to.

This is a serious breach of privacy.

Isn’t the extra money for Stage 2 Light Rail needed because of the National Capital Authority’s restrictions on Commonwealth Avenue? And wouldn’t a Labor government be able to remove those restrictions?

Capital Retro1:03 pm 11 Apr 19

I just received an email from the Labor Party seeking my vote for Katy Gallagher.

I have never had any dealings with the Labor Party so I am wondering where they got my email address from; it wouldn’t be the electoral role as I their information is limited to age, gender and occupation.

So, whose data base did they hack?

Terry Johnson12:18 pm 05 Apr 19

Fantastic that she is running for a senate seat. Honestly and integrity is in her DNA. We need more politicians like Katy.

Capital Retro2:57 pm 05 Apr 19

Her honesty and integrity may be OK but her comprehension of the requirements to be eligible to stand for the Senate was lacking.

Honesty and Integrity? I just spilled my coffee

Amanda Kiley7:34 am 17 Apr 19

Ummm … honesty? Didn’t she lie about her citizenship eligibility?

Capital Retro10:56 am 04 Apr 19

Bill Shorten is on record as saying he supported her return to politics.

The two questions that need to be answered is the status of her citizenship and if she will be number one on the ballot choices.

This is much more interesting than the “git rid of Zed” campaign.

Both of those questions have already been answered in the affirmative.

No more citizenship issues and straight to number 1 on the ballot paper for literally the cushiest job in Canberra.

Capital Retro10:32 pm 04 Apr 19

I don’t question what you say but where did you get that from because I couldn’t Google anything about at all.

“She also points to the $200 million funding promise for Stage 2 light rail, comparing it to the funding that made the Majura Parkway possible. Similar decisions, she says, will be made on the basis of whether they are nation-building infrastructure.”

Well, those projects are similar to the level they are both infrastructure projects.

But that’s about where it ends, considering that Infrastructure Australia rejected providing any funding of the stage 1 light rail due to the poor return on investment and woeful business case, compared to the Majura Parkway which passed with flying colours and was funded.

Considering that there’s no way that stage 2 of light rail will have a cost benefit ratio even as high as the woeful stage 1 leg, how can this type of pork, I mean funding, be viable?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.