21 June 2024

Public sector's gender pay gap narrower than private counterparts – but still a long way off

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
14
woman speaking at Press Club

Mary Wooldridge addressed the National Press Club in March on ‘Accelerating gender equality in Australian workplaces’. Photo: Hilary Wardhaugh.

Women in the Federal Government’s workforce are earning, on average, 86 cents for every dollar men get – equating to $19,000 a year less.

Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) released a comprehensive report on Thursday (20 June), showing the average gender pay gap in the public sector is 13.5 per cent. It’s 8.2 percentage points lower (better) than the average total remuneration gender pay gap in the private sector of 21.7 per cent.

It marks the first comparable results of the gender pay gap and gender equality performance of the Commonwealth public sector, compared to Australia’s private sector.

The Commonwealth Public Sector Gender Equality Scorecard: Key Employer Results from 2022 is the first of a new annual report series publishing the results from Commonwealth public sector gender equality reporting to WGEA against the six gender equality indicators (GEIs).

WGEA chief executive officer Mary Wooldridge said the scorecard revealed progress had been made but more work remained in reducing the gender pay gap.

“A key message from this first Commonwealth Public Sector Gender Equality Scorecard is that good policies alone do not translate into outcomes. Positive change takes thought and deliberate action,” she said.

“The scorecard shows the Commonwealth public sector has benefitted from clearly articulated commitments and sector-wide reforms in areas the private sector finds difficult to change, such as gender balance in management positions.

“Commonwealth public sector employers are also taking actions to deliver flexibility that helps empower more women to take leadership roles and drives gender balance in key management positions.

“But more does need to be done across all employers to continue to reduce the gender pay gap, including to combat stereotypes that deter men from taking parental leave and around women in non-manager roles.”

READ ALSO MPs and top public servant pay hikes to make them among the world’s highest paid

Management positions in the public sector are gender-balanced overall, according to the scorecard.

It shows 48 per cent of all Commonwealth public sector employers have a gender-balanced management team, compared to 27 per cent in the private sector.

But men are 2.5 times more likely to be in the highest paying quartile, compared to 1.9 times in the private sector. This figure in the private sector is driven in part by highly paid non-manager roles – professionals, trades and technicians – which predominantly employ men.

Men account for 11 per cent of universal or primary carer’s leave taken (compared to 14 per cent in the private sector). Although 99 per cent of employers offer paid parental leave, just 13 per cent offer it universally without labels of ‘primary’ or ‘secondary’ carer.

This is significantly lower than the private sector at 21 per cent.

Other key results from the scorecard show the mid-point of employer gender pay gaps is lower than the private sector – 50 per cent of employers have a median total remuneration gender pay gap above 6.9 per cent, compared to 9.1 per cent for the private sector.

Three-quarters of employees in the Commonwealth public sector work full-time and nine per cent part-time, compared to 54 per cent and 21 per cent respectively in the private sector.

Women are more likely to work full-time (73 per cent) than in the private sector where almost three in five women (59 per cent) are employed part-time or casually.

This could reflect a normalisation of flexible working arrangements in the public sector.

READ ALSO SMEs get more opportunity in new government procurement targets

Minister for Women and for the Public Service Katy Gallagher said the government was focussed on improving equality for women and the Commonwealth public sector should be a model employer.

“Earlier this year we published private sector gender pay gaps for the first time, now we’re shining a light on progress in the public sector on gender equality,” Senator Gallagher said.

“The private sector has been reporting to WGEA for a decade – now the Commonwealth public sector has stepped up and reported as well.

“The public sector should set a standard for promoting gender equality and WGEA reporting is a key part of that…”

But she said “there is more work to do”.

“For example, we know we need to encourage stronger uptake of parental leave by men, and part-time workers should not be overlooked for promotion.

“Positively, the public sector has achieved gender balance in every level of management as a result of setting targets and our focus on achieving them.”

The scorecard includes data for Australian Public Service departments and agencies, and public sector employers not under the umbrella of the Australian Public Service Commission (APSC).

The Respect@Work Report recommended public sector reporting to WGEA.

Subsequent legislation introduced by the Albanese Government requires Commonwealth public sector employers with 100 or more employees to submit gender equality reports to WGEA.

This includes Commonwealth entities and companies, and Australian Defence Force employees, which means results differ from the previously released APSC data.

Join the conversation

14
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Look at all the privileged white males running to the comments to contribute to the conversation that of course not only doesn’t concern them directly, but about experiences they haven’t lived.

It’s also men who are quite happy displaying their ignorance of how these stats are calculated.

Ray,
Not really. The “statistics” are literally comparing apples with oranges and then claiming there must be an issue because they are different.

Actual discrimination would involve evidence that people in the same roles are receiving different remuneration. This evidence just shows that people in different roles get different amounts. Breathtaking.

More nonsense. These surveys are ridiculous. They don’t take account of qualifications, years in the workforce or hours the person wishes to work.
It really is fake news.

Look at the report and how the numbers are compared. They do take all that into account.

It seems that women are being paid less because their careers are being interrupted by pesky things such as having babies and maternity leave.

Perhaps to boost their pay statistics women should be getting their male partners (those that have them) to take the career hit and do the parental leave instead.

I hear quotas are a popular method of enforcing equality, so perhaps something like that is needed.

Perhaps we should look at quota targets used in various industries and apply those rates to the gender allocation of parental leave, forcing more men to do their share of child raising and allowing more women to have better careers.

George Hastings2:28 pm 21 Jun 24

It is already illegal to pay women less for same job, this is worst than conspiracy because it has been outed so many times as garbage. Why waste public money on this nonsense?

It’s not been “outed” as garbage.
And it’s actually well known that across the public service different departments have significantly different salary levels for the same jobs at the same level, regardless of gender.

Ray: Thanks for making the point – “regardless of gender”.

I’m really upset by this garbage “research” and its uncritical regurgitation by media… everyone will just swallow this lie and think it’s true.

It’s completely wrong-headed “research”. It is disinformation. It isn’t true.

Can you imagine a report that took the average salaries of 25-30 year old APS employees, and compared them to 45-50 year old APS employees, saw that younger staff earn less, and then said, “Aha! the APS discriminates and rips-off younger people, we need to ensure EL2s and SES are under 30 years old – THIS IS EVIDENCE OF PREJUDICE NYAAAAAA!”. But that is essentially what the report says – Chapter 3 is a travesty.

The report pays NO attention to the career impact that motherhood has on women, it just mentions children or birth in the context of ensuring access to HR policies that support women at that stage of their lives (Chapter 4). It ignores the conscious decisions that mothers (and fathers) make about how they want to raise their kids and build their lives, who works full-time, who works part-time, how long they have off work, etc.

By ignoring those things, it pretends that women are infants and victims of choices they purposefully made, and pretends that stingy men are rampantly discriminating against women. I’m so tired of dodgy data and the gotcha grab.

Yes, the level of data analysis and research in these reports is truly depressing.

It is almost as if they are solely created for the media headlines that always ensue rather than any real wish to assess the issue.

What nonsense.
There is no gender pay gap.
Women work less, so earn less.
Women and men doing the same job at the same classification are paid an identical wage.

Nobody is still buying this lie.

But there are more women
s votes than men’s in this country.

Yes, and any woman I know that isn’t a complete idiot finds these claims absurd.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.