Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Skilled legal advice with
accessible & personal attention

Teenager coming back from Wagga for Griffith housebreak

By johnboy - 25 November 2013 8

A 19-year-old man was extradited from NSW over the weekend by members of ACT Policing Criminal Investigations for offences from 2010.

On the night of January 12, 2010, police will allege the teenager committed an aggravated burglary in Griffith (ACT) in which a woman was assaulted and her handbag stolen.

The 64-year-old woman was in bed inside her Sturt Avenue home about 11.55pm when a man entered the bedroom and threatened her with a kitchen knife.

The man struck her to the side of the face with a fist before fleeing with her handbag after she screamed loudly several times. She suffered swelling and bruising to her cheek and eye as a result.

On Saturday (November 23, 2013) Detectives from Criminal Investigations travelled to Wagga Wagga where the extradition of the man was granted.

The man will face the ACT Children’s Court this morning charged with Theft, Aggravated burglary, and Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm.

[Courtesy ACT Policing]

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
8 Responses to
Teenager coming back from Wagga for Griffith housebreak
Blen_Carmichael 5:43 pm 28 Nov 13

voytek3 said :

Robertson said :

SheepGroper said :

voytek3 said :

Why is it legal for some people to breed?

Because neutering them is against their human rights, despite them not respecting the human rights of others. Bring on compulsory participation in medical experiments for the violent dregs of society!

I agree criminals and welfare-bludgers should be de-sexed.

I’m guessing in this case it makes us genocidal racists.

I’m not genocidal or racist. Some people just shouldn’t be allowed to procreate – this Wagga guys parents, IVF morons who are in direct contravention of nature etc etc…

Yeah, look fully agree with you about those “IVF morons who are in direct contravention of nature.” Same goes for putting those premature babies in humidicribs. Likewise for giving lifesaving treatment to those deemed to have “defective” genes. Nature, you see, should be the sole determiner as to who lives and who dies. As can be seen from Voytek3, his/her or its parents’ rutting in a natural state (e.g. bed/floor/Sandman) gives rise to the birth of a far soo-perior person.

IrishPete 3:00 pm 28 Nov 13

Robertson said :

IrishPete said :

If any of you have the uncanny ability to predict, 16 or more years in advance, which people’s progeny will commit an offence like this, ,…

So, you’re in the neo-natal ward and the nurse points to a crib and says, “There is Zaydn Massey”.

What odds would you offer me?

You think the child will actually have their surname?

Anyway, neonatal seems a little late. Unless you are suggesting sterilising the baby, which might be going too far. Just give it to some decent parents. And change its first name.

IP

Robertson 11:50 am 28 Nov 13

IrishPete said :

If any of you have the uncanny ability to predict, 16 or more years in advance, which people’s progeny will commit an offence like this, ,…

So, you’re in the neo-natal ward and the nurse points to a crib and says, “There is Zaydn Massey”.

What odds would you offer me?

voytek3 10:28 am 28 Nov 13

Robertson said :

SheepGroper said :

voytek3 said :

Why is it legal for some people to breed?

Because neutering them is against their human rights, despite them not respecting the human rights of others. Bring on compulsory participation in medical experiments for the violent dregs of society!

I agree criminals and welfare-bludgers should be de-sexed.

I’m guessing in this case it makes us genocidal racists.

I’m not genocidal or racist. Some people just shouldn’t be allowed to procreate – this Wagga guys parents, IVF morons who are in direct contravention of nature etc etc. Apart from anything else, the world is already severly overpopulated which is the cause of climate change….I care about mother earth. Is that so wrong?

IrishPete 8:29 pm 27 Nov 13

Robertson said :

SheepGroper said :

voytek3 said :

Why is it legal for some people to breed?

Because neutering them is against their human rights, despite them not respecting the human rights of others. Bring on compulsory participation in medical experiments for the violent dregs of society!

I agree criminals and welfare-bludgers should be de-sexed.

I’m guessing in this case it makes us genocidal racists.

If any of you have the uncanny ability to predict, 16 or more years in advance, which people’s progeny will commit an offence like this, I suggest you document it, for you will surely win the inaugural Nobel Prize for Eugenics.

IP

Robertson 3:32 pm 26 Nov 13

SheepGroper said :

voytek3 said :

Why is it legal for some people to breed?

Because neutering them is against their human rights, despite them not respecting the human rights of others. Bring on compulsory participation in medical experiments for the violent dregs of society!

I agree criminals and welfare-bludgers should be de-sexed.

I’m guessing in this case it makes us genocidal racists.

SheepGroper 12:57 pm 26 Nov 13

voytek3 said :

Why is it legal for some people to breed?

Because neutering them is against their human rights, despite them not respecting the human rights of others. Bring on compulsory participation in medical experiments for the violent dregs of society!

voytek3 8:47 am 26 Nov 13

Why is it legal for some people to breed?

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site