17 September 2024

Two teens allegedly assault three people at Canberra Centre

| Albert McKnight
Join the conversation
22
Canberra Centre entrance

The teens allegedly assaulted three people at the Canberra Centre on Monday. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Two teenagers are accused of unprovoked assaults on three people in the Canberra Centre, leaving them with serious head injuries.

ACT Policing said at about 1:50 pm on Monday (16 September), a group of teenagers were causing a disturbance in the mall by knocking over displays and shouting at members of the public.

A 65-year-old man approached the group and reprimanded them for their behaviour before he walked outside.

It is alleged a 16-year-old boy followed him and repeatedly hit him in the face, causing him to fall to the ground.

READ ALSO Alleged Gungahlin road rage stabber arrested, refused bail

A bystander attempted to intervene and defend the man, but it is alleged he was also repeatedly struck in the face by the 16-year-old.

Police allege that when a second bystander tried to use her trolley to prevent any more assaults, she was hit in the back of the head by a 14-year-old girl with a shopping bag.

“All three victims sustained serious facial and mouth injuries as a result of the alleged assault,” a police spokesperson said.

“A short time after the alleged assaults occurred, the boy and girl fled the scene in a taxi.”

Two teenagers were soon spotted in the Canberra Outlet Centre, where the 16-year-old boy allegedly stole a pair of shoes from a store.

READ ALSO Coroner hands down findings into horror Monaro Highway crash as driver’s prison sentence ends

He allegedly tried to flee from police, but was arrested after a short foot pursuit. The 14-year-old girl was arrested as well.

The 16-year-old faced the ACT Children’s Court on Tuesday charged with two counts of assault and theft.

The 14-year-old girl will face the Children’s Court next month charged with assault.

Join the conversation

22
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Can we start charging the parents to? Statistically speaking they’re probably committing another crime anyway…

No place that ever gives itself over to woke libertarianism gets away with it. San Francisco: sh*t hole. Portland: sh*t hole. L.A: sh*t hole. And on and on and on I could go.

That Canberra thinks that it can buck the trend, is just the kind of thing that it would think.

Finance 6'5" Blue Eyes5:00 pm 02 Oct 24

Sh*t hole? Don’t you mean “woketopia”?!?

There is another conversation that needs to happen about people’s rights and Housing ACT (HACT) criteria. Are most people aware that Hosuing does not do a working with children or vulnerable people check or a police check for current offences when they give someone a home? In effect they hand offenders a public asset, a home for life; its almost impossible for HACT to get a successful brief up to ACAT and get an eviction for anything other than unpaid rent! why this is, apart from poor laws and policies – like HACT staff competencies/resources is another issue. HACT then place recidivist criminals with vulnerable sick elderly people and with families with minors in now mostly apartment complexes where people have no choice but to live in close proximity to each other. If these checks are required for many employment positions surely no reasonable voting citizen could object to these checks for housing. Housing may be a human right but vulnerable people without criminal records are potential victims of these recidivist and addicts and they should not be given a home in the same complexes. It’s also just common sense. In effect women and children without addictions or criminal addictions are regularly told a home with shared common spaces like car parks etc with a criminal of assault is a legitimate offer they have to accept. what is HACT duty of care here?

criminal convictions*

Dreadful but props to the people who confronted their behaviour, even if it didn’t end well.

I agree – they should be rewarded for their courage. It’s time to stand up to offending bullies.

Tom McLuckie8:32 pm 18 Sep 24

When I contacted Rachel Stephen-Smith about how many people had been criminalised in the ACT the year before decriminalisation it was 7 persons. She didn’t expand on the quantity of drugs, previous history, conditions of liberty, but seven people went forward to the courts. That was the big arguments for decriminalisation – we were getting people caught in a cycle of criminality, despite figures that through existing diversion laws between 2019 and 2022 over 200 people avoided any conviction for possession of small quantities alone. This year we have had minimum (coroner’s still finalising a few matters) over 20 overdose deaths. Yes, over 20.

Dealers have resorted to using under 14’s to transport and traffic drugs as they can’t be charged. We have underage persons getting drugs pill tested to then pass back to be sold on the market. What a mess. The cart before the horse with no real thought on how things would play out. Any wonder without anti-consorting laws why all the Bikie gangs are locating to Canberra? All those pesky risk mitigations avoided by pushing this through as a private member’s bill that Rachel Stephen-Smith boasted about avoiding and having the legislation introduced quicker down at a Labor conference in Melbourne are well and truly coming home to roost. Blood on their hands.

Its so much worse than people realise. The ACT has the lowest or second lowest success rate at solving crimes across all jurisdictions (called a clearance or “investigation finalised”), the lowest or second lowest rate of identifying the offender and then prosecuting them (called “offender proceeded against”), the lowest rate of DPP getting a conviction in court by a mile (65% when everyone else bats 95% to 99.5% and the next worst juro is Tassie with 83% conviction rate), the lowest rate of bail compliance, and the highest rate of recidivism… and I’m not even getting into the disproportionately high rates of crimes getting “diverted” from criminal courts, or the high use of ICOs that have near-zero compliance.

The CBD used to be safer than Woden for shopping, but it sounds like it too has descended into a place to be avoided.

Heywood Smith1:38 pm 18 Sep 24

I think what we need is to build a large Youth DC right next to the AMC. The current system is BS and isnt working. I also agree parents should be held accountable for the actions of their (minors) childrens actions.

More little punks on the street showing no remorse because they know the revolving door of bail laws will spit them back out into the populace. Thanks Greens

@Futureproof
… even worse. Had any of the victims actually fought back and injured one of these scrotes, the court would have come down on them like a ton of bricks.

I agree we now have a ridiculous situation where offenders right are greater and more important than a victims. This is out of step with what the majority of the population, who are not offenders want in their societies. The current laws do not represent the majority of good citizens in the ACT but offenders.

Finance 6'5" Blue Eyes5:02 pm 02 Oct 24

100%

It is like Lord of the Flies most days here in the CBD. With so many people either busy at work, or not in the CBD, they just don’t have any clue how bad it is. Since Xmas, I’ve seen ambos come to resuscitate drug users more than ten times – people just passed out in the open, blokes lounging in the sun on the middle of the pavement wearing nothing, there is open dealing in the city (Hamsterdam!), the whistles (prison signalling) are constant, the fights, Westfield has closed many exits to reduce rip-and-run shoplifting by eshays, the increase in private security, little orange needle caps and syringes on pavements everywhere and park bushes full of them… it’s like Oaks Estate moved to the CBD, and the government’s steely neglect and denial came with it. And somehow, it’s not a public issue or a public concern.

You get what you vote for.

Heywood Smith1:34 pm 18 Sep 24

Well said.. I only venture into the ghetto when its absolutely necessary!

Simple answer is don’t vote Green as Rattenbury has proved time and time again that there is no justice for victims of crime.

I agree offenders have more rights than victims. Victims not offenders rights should come first – every time.  An offenders rights must be sacrificed if granting that right adversely affects the victim’s lives because that just creates more damage. I know people forced to live for over 5 mths with a perpetrator charged with assault occasioning bodily harm.  The offender lives in the same building but was given bail & allowed to return home despite court delays of 12 mths.  The offender is always in wait in common spaces breaching the Bail metre limits to intimidate & instil fear.  Why should victims live with this?  Police say it’s not worth arresting as the Magistrates will grant bail again & note the offender was already on a good behaviour bond from 2 other criminal offences at the time &yet bail was granted again. Magistrates are willing to accept addiction as an excuse for assault!  Clearly they don’t live in apartment complexes. When do substances etc just magically involuntarily jump into an offenders mouth? Med Science shows 75% relapse into addiction within 3 mths of treatment and have criminal histories; by 6 months 95% relapse.  The majority 95% don’t make it. The legislature needs to realise that they are out of step with what THE MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION WHO ARE NOT ADDICTS WANT. Clearly some people can’t change/rehab & some clearly don’t want to & society & victims should not suffer this. Laws need to change.

Why are so many, including juveniles getting away with bond, sometimes seriously and repeatedly offences, and only getting a slap on the wrist? The police are frustrated enough without the courts just doing this. Is this a simple case of politics interfering with legal procedures, which we all know should not be occurring at all? Or is it the Labor Government simply brown nosing everyone with their ideals? I know come the ACT elections I’m going to test that and see what the alternatives can offer, because justice in the ACT currently, is shite, mainly for any victims, whilst those that offend just get a slap on the wrist. Again, and again, and again……

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.