WorkSafe ACT crackdown on building sites uncovers “general disregard” for safety

Genevieve Jacobs 1 February 2020 9
Professional engineer

WorkSafe ACT says a number of residential building sites across Canberra showed remarkable disregard for health and safety. Photo: File.

More than 70 notices have been issued by WorkSafe ACT for a range of breaches described by Commissioner Greg Jones as disappointing in both their scale and seriousness.

The notices are the outcome of a city wide blitz undertaken by the agency with a focus on ensuring that builders and sub-contractors fulfil their legal health and safety obligations towards workers. Residential building sites in both north and south Canberra were targetted.

But inspectors found that in a substantial number of cases, the building sites demonstrated a lack of due care for their worker’s safety and wellbeing.

Mr Jones cited a “general disregard” for basic safety requirements on a number of sites, despite inspectors discovering “imminent risks” to workers.

A total of 28 different building sites across Canberra have been served with notices, some for multiple breaches after a 47-year-old construction worker died at Denman Prospect on January 11, prompting the crackdown.

Mr Jones said the lack of compliance WorkSafe found was all the more surprising, given that the man’s death should have drawn the industry’s attention to major safety issues.

19 of the notices were prohibitions, which require all work on the sites to stop until the breaches were dealt with to the satisfaction of WorkSafe.

“The level of compliance with the safety laws was poor,” Mr Jones said.

“There seemed to be a general disregard for work safety with basic protection systems not in place and little planning to ensure work was undertaken in a safe manner.”

Incomplete scaffolding, no protection to prevent falls from heights, electrical safety issues and inadequate security were all identified as major issues.

“WorkSafe inspections in this area will continue and inspectors will not hesitate to issue more notices, including closing sites that do not meet basic safety requirements,” Mr Jones said.

ACT Policing’s Criminal Investigation Team are conducting a joint investigation with WorkSafe ACT and will prepare a report for the coroner. Information obtained via a warrant on January 15 is currently being analysed and due to the ongoing nature of the investigation, WorkSafe is unwilling to comment further on the specifics of the case.

What's Your Opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
9 Responses to WorkSafe ACT crackdown on building sites uncovers “general disregard” for safety
Daniel Howell Daniel Howell 1:55 pm 02 Feb 20

About time

Frank Trapani Frank Trapani 11:42 am 02 Feb 20

WorkSafe ACT crackdown on any aftermath of serious accident or death is good but, is not acceptable because, the Rules of OH&S are very clear on the responsibility for Duty of Care and for running regular reports checks by an OH&S Inspector to eliminate any potential hazards. When was the last inspection done to expose hazardous deficiencies before, the first accident occurred ??

Tony Webber Tony Webber 11:34 am 02 Feb 20

Looks like not much has changed since my brother was nearly killed 10years ago on a govt worksite due to negligence!!!!!!

    Des Main Des Main 12:14 pm 02 Feb 20

    Tony Webber Where the hell did ten years go??

    Frank Trapani Frank Trapani 12:26 pm 02 Feb 20

    Tony Webber. Have any of those penalties being implemented?

    Maximum penalties under the WHS Act:

    Type of offence Maximum penalty for corporation Maximum penalty for officers Maximum penalty for workers

    Category 1 – Breach of a health and safety duty involving recklessness as to the risk of death or serious injury or illness without reasonable excuse $3,000,000 $600,000 or 5 years’ imprisonment $300,000 or 5 years’ imprisonment

    Category 2 – Breach of a health and safety duty which expose an individual to death or serious injury or illness (without recklessness) $1,500,000 $300,000 $150,000

    Category 3 – Other breaches of health and safety duties $500,000 $100,000

    Tony Webber Tony Webber 12:44 pm 02 Feb 20

    Des Main I think it's nearly to the day!!!!!

    Tony Webber Tony Webber 1:36 pm 02 Feb 20

    Frank Trapani NO idea mate,,,it took years to get a result through the courts!!! Regardless of rules and regs!!!!! The pain and suffering he went through could never be compensated!!! Those figures are purely a guideline..mostly never enforced due to massive courtcosts!!!!!

Paul May Paul May 10:23 am 02 Feb 20

Of course, that costs money

Arthur Arthur 8:11 am 02 Feb 20

And no regard for public safety either. How many construction fences are built on footpaths and in the road reserve? . How many sites have dangerous broken rusty wire mesh to gouge your eye out? How many roadwork signs are there to impale or slice bike riders? How many loads of rusty reinforcing bars are dumped on nature strips How many WorkSafe people are there who don’t care about what the public impact is of their incompetence, even when they are politely told about it?

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site