12 November 2024

30-dwelling Yarralumla public housing proposal approved

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
45
render of public housing

An artist’s impression of the proposed 30-dwelling public housing development in Yarralumla. Images: Collins Pennington.

A proposed public housing development in Yarralumla has been speedily approved despite a long list of concerns from nearby residents.

The $6 million, two-storey project will replace the old Solander Court complex at 2 Schlich Street, which has been sitting derelict for more than four years.

The site will become denser, rising from a dozen units to 30 one (18), two (10) and three-bedroom (2) units with courtyards.

The Yarralumla Residents Association did not oppose the development but assisted nearby residents with their concerns, which included the increased density and size, traffic and parking, loss of trees, the resumption of a south-facing ungazetted park and a lack of consultation.

READ ALSO ACT laws making renters’ lives better, says new report

President Peter Pharoah said the YRA had always supported appropriate, salt-and-pepper public housing that blended in with the landscape.

“What is disappointing is it’s taken four and a half years for the government to actually do anything about the site,” Mr Pharoah said.

He said the tenants were given very short notice to leave, but the property was then left vacant, except for a squatter.

Local SES members even practised anti-terror drills in the deteriorating complex.

“To me, that’s criminal, and since [Chief Minister Andrew] Barr’s come in, we’ve got less government housing than we had 10 years ago,” Mr Pharoah said.

He also criticised the government’s lack of consultation, shoving it out just before the caretaker period.

render of public housing

A view of the larger units in the proposed development.

Mr Pharoah said while the block would be largely cleared, the verge trees would be protected, and a condition banned construction vehicles from parking there, although he questioned whether that would be enforced.

Residents had been concerned about traffic issues from increased street parking, but the Notice of Decision said TCCS would deal with that later if it emerged.

Mr Pharaoh said that could be a problem as EPSDD always underestimated traffic and parking volumes.

“Traffic management in Yarralumla is a problem because Yarralumla is set to double in the next 10 years in population and the streets aren’t very big for highway-style movements,” he said.

There was also the broader issue of insufficient infrastructure to support new housing developments such as the Brickworks and the Forestry school projects.

“The CSIRO Forestry development is going to happen across the road, and they’re going to have to put significant infrastructure into that because the stormwater and sewage systems in Yarralumla haven’t been maintained since self-government,” he said.

“And when you double the population, they’re going to have to put huge mains in, probably in front of this development, sometime in the future.

“They carry on developing things incrementally or disjointed incrementally rather than having a look at the long-term requirements for that particular development.”

READ ALSO Ginninderry enters next phase with key development announcements

Overall, the YRA welcomed the public housing, which would blend in. But more consultation would have improved the outcome, Mr Pharoah said.

Conditions imposed include protection of the retained and verge trees and more information to be provided on the internal pedestrian network, communal clothes drying area, driveway sightlines, hazardous materials, and a waste and recycling plan.

The development application was submitted in September. It attracted 16 representations.

Join the conversation

45
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Driving into Yarralumla it’s immediately obvious what makes it beautiful and desirable.
Shady street trees, flocks of birds, parks, flowering gardens, bushland, open green spaces and recreation facilities for picnics, swimming, running, walking, water-sports…
This space is an asset belonging to all of Canberra, part of our joint heritage. Yarralumla is a model for other suburbs.
But Yarralumla is set to double in size from two major property developments on the former Brickworks and CSIRO sites. How existing roads and infrasturucture can cope with such an influx of people and traffic is a worry for current residents, but not for FIFO property developers and real estate agents.
Residents anywhere should fight to preserve what’s best about where they live, just like indigenous people fight to care for country.
Those who accuse residents of being nimbys are simply the useful idiots of neo-colonialist corporate property developers, still trying to exploit, displace and appropriate land for personal profit. Indigenous people were also nimbys.

Nick Stevens10:00 am 15 Nov 24

Maybe to the shady trees, birds, flowering plants and open spaces will brighten up the lives of the disadvantaged a little bit. But that not how it works does it?

For those here complaining about public housing tenants, in the 50s and 60s almost all of Yarralumla was public housing, it was definitely not a luxury suburb. Sounds good to bring some back amongst the mansions.

This is a small development which is how public housing should occur for full benefits of those living there and their neighbours. Small developments scattered through all suburbs is what Canberra is known for. Large developments are problematic.

Having lived for 15 years in Stuart Street with Stuart flats at one end of the street, Gowrie Court at the other end, shops and a smaller group of public housing units in the middle, made for an interesting place to live. No problem with most residents and I had public housing next door. Mostly people who were doing it tough, not criminal at all. Stereotyping in some of the comments here is atrocious.

However, when the big developments were turned into private housing, property prices skyrocketed. Perhaps that’s what some Yarralumla residents were hoping would happen.

Capital Retro4:23 pm 13 Nov 24

Doesn’t Rudd still own a house in Yarralumla?
The so-called nimbys there should be more concerned that he could return there when he gets deported from the USA.

Incidental Tourist3:35 pm 13 Nov 24

Most of those who work and pay taxes will never afford this property. Lavish public housing in prime location like these encourage sloth. Why would ever start working if you get Yarralumla address? If you will, you will be kicked out.

You clearly do not know what you are talking about. “You do not get kicked out” if you start working. You no longer get a rebated rent.
In the past there have been Ministers who have lived in public housing.

Capital Retro11:29 am 14 Nov 24

“In the past there have been Ministers who have lived in public housing.”
Indeed there has been, Tom Uren was at a complex at Kingston (now gone) and an ACT Green lady was in a house at Yarralumla.
Don’t think any current ministers of MPs are in public housing currently.

Incidental Tourist11:53 am 14 Nov 24

It makes the problem even worse then. First, those working (especially on ministerial salary) and occupying public housing are clearly no longer eligible. If they can’t be kicked out then this is waste of public money. Second, very few will be able to afford market rent of new townhouse in Yarralumla, especially on a low salary if they start working after long unemployment period. It means there is clear disincentive to start work because the rent increase in these locations combined with loosing other unemployment/low income subsidies will make the financial position worse. Third, one large townhouse in prime location is worth two apartments elsewhere. Yet again building lavish properties in prime locations is yet another sign of waste of taxpayer’s money.

I live here, there’s always been social housing in the area, it’s never really been a problem. The people who want to look down their noses at battlers should check their privilege.

Having more wealth doesn’t make anyone a better person that anyone else.

I am neither wealthy nor privileged and I don’t look down my nose at anyone – except for those neighbouring public housing tenants who robbed me of sundry precious possessions

So you’re looking down your nose at a group of people because of a bad experience with some people…

Your comment is a bit of a misnomer CMM.

Without knowing the full circumstances of the theft of your “precious possessions”, accusing public housing tenants and tarring them all with the same brush is unfortunate.

It is one of Canberra’s oldest public housing sites and is simply being upgraded with new and more modern housing.

And btw I have lived there – basically all of my 75 years

Incidental Tourist10:48 pm 13 Nov 24

yes, these incidents are rather common unfortunately. But it is politically incorrect to raise this issue in public forum.

What, you saw them do it CMM? Or just assumed they were the ones who did it? And was it all of them or just a tiny minority? It is completely unscientific to generalise from one example. It’s a personal anecdote, not the story of public housing tenants.

PS. I write from experience, and am sincere in suggesting Yarralumla residents take extra security precautions

There was social housing on the site previously, it’s just being upgraded.

So sincere you are remaining anonymous

be ready to be burgled or have your car stolen

Good stuff! YRA NIMBYs will complain about anything – good to see this get approved!

I live here, and I don’t have an issue with it. None of my friends and neighbours in the area, whom I have spoken to, have an issue with it, AFAIK. The resident’s association doesn’t have an issue with it.

But don’t let that get in the way of your fantasy about Yaralumla NIMBYs.

Heywood Smith9:37 am 13 Nov 24

Surely people don’t pay top dollar to live in this suburb only to be surrounded by public housing and questionable characters (that’s putting it nicely).

@Heywood Smith
Absolutely agree – the great unwashed should be confined to ghettos and slums.

Tuggeranong with the rest of them!

Heywood Smith4:05 pm 13 Nov 24

Nah cuz, send em my way up here in Charny!!

Just glad I’ll never have one of these ghettos built nearby.

Allawah Court, Bega Court, Currong Apartments, Burnie Court, Stuart Flats, Northbourne Flats. Have we learnt nothing?

I hope you don’t live near me Zhi Goh!

i am all for having more of these in south Canberra. 30 is nothing atleast in the few thousands are needed.
good reflection on community.

These artistic impressions always neglect to include the graffiti, car bodies and towels or flags that will hang from such a beautifully designed cell.

The old property when it was occupied didn’t have those things but don’t let that get in the way…

It is good to see this proposal for public housing is progressing quickly now that it has the go ahead.

It is disappointing that these resident and NIMBY groups use all their delaying tactics to oppose these developments, particularly for public housing and then blame the government for the holdups!

Capital Retro8:39 pm 12 Nov 24

Anything similar to this public housing proposal happening in Braddon?

Gregg Heldon7:54 am 13 Nov 24

Read the article Jack. They are not opposed to the development. They have two concerns. Why is the current development derelict for four years, which is reasonable and fair. And, in a heritage suburb like Yarralumla, infrastructure like sewage may need upgrading. Especially with future developments and increased population in the pipeline. Again, reasonable and fair.
Nothing in this article suggests the residents want to delay the development.

Yes Gregg Heldon I did read the article as well as other media in Canberra which has been reporting it.

It is the site of some of Canberra’s oldest public housing residences and the development when complete will be made available to low income earners.

Local residents opposing the project, or NIMBY’s as they are most commonly known raised the usual complaints these groups have to delay these projects, particularly public housing developments and included building height, impacts on local amenity, trees, traffic etc, etc.

I do have concerns however about the government’s lack of action in allowing this and other sites around Canberra to deteriorate to this point, boarded up and fenced for long periods of time. I wonder what Yvette Berry as housing minister has been doing all this time to allow it to happen so regularly.

Not to mention her secretiveness and refusal to reveal the numbers of empty public housing properties which are currently standing vacant throughout Canberra.

Capital Retro11:26 am 13 Nov 24

Thanks JS. I’ll follow that up because the CT is paywalled.
I think the proposal is a redevelopment of an old public housing site. I have friends in Braddon and they don’t know anything about it but I know a of of residents there are furious about the intrusion of new bike paths going in.

Residents furious about the intrusion of new bike paths being built in Braddon CR?

For goodness sake do you people ever stop whingeing!

Those hillbilly’s who whinge about Braddon but probably would never travel outside their little bubbles out in suburbia, hop on a bike or be seen in Braddon furious about the new bike paths.

New bike paths recently built on Lonsdale Street.

They are are just wonderful!

Unfortunately lobbying to turn the street into pedestrian only has come to nothing.

Hopefully these new bike paths are just the beginning and we will see many more bike paths being constructed around Canberra.

Gregg Heldon1:20 pm 13 Nov 24

You questioning the Government, Jack? Will wonders ever cease. ACT Housing is incredibly mis managed, and are neglecting the vulnerable in the community.
And I did not know what the acronym NIMBY stood for, even though I first heard it almost 40 years ago. So thanks for that.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.