21 August 2024

Canberra Liberals commit $98 million to implementing literacy and numeracy reforms in schools package

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
18

Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee outside Evelyn Scott School in Denman Prospect. “We are the only party that can be trusted to fully fund and fully implement these recommendations.” Photo: Ian Bushnell.

The Canberra Liberals will almost quadruple government funding to implement the recommendations of the independent literacy and numeracy inquiry as part of its evidence-driven plan to improve public school performance.

Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee said a Liberal Government would spend $98 million over four years, dwarfing the Barr Government’s Budget commitment of $24.9 million to the Strong Foundations program, of which she said only $1.7 million was new money.

The figure is more than the $92 million that the ACT Alliance for Evidence-based Education argued for in its Budget submission.

READ ALSO Parliament poised to criminalise sharing sexual ‘deepfakes’ as survey reveals AI concerns

Ms Lee said the government’s approach was woefully inadequate and brought into question its commitment to implementing the recommendations fully.

“The Canberra Liberals approach is very clear,” she said.

“We are the only party that can be trusted to fully fund and fully implement these recommendations.

“It’s also concerning that the Minister [Yvette Berry] has provided no guarantee that the implementation plan will be available from the government’s perspective before the election.”

The Liberals’ schools plan includes Year 1 phonics checks and a multi-tiered system of support for students, both of which the government has committed to, a strengthened monitoring of progress across all years, a boost to school maintenance, and specific support for teachers.

Ms Lee said her government would equip every ACT Government school with decodable readers and provide the support and training that teachers needed to deliver the Strong Foundations program.

She said there was no reason why Ms Berry could not have begun work on the program immediately, including rolling out Year 1 phonic checks.

The Liberals have also promised to lower schools’ administrative burden, providing each ACT teacher with a $200 voucher at the start of each school year to help with classroom supplies of their choosing and introduce access to an opt-in behaviour curriculum where unruliness was a problem.

Ms Lee said the Liberals wanted to have teachers’ backs when it came to classroom behaviour and provide support if they needed it.

This would be in the form of the Classroom Mastery program being piloted in a couple of ACT Catholic schools.

“We know that disruption in the classroom is not good for the teachers, and it’s not good for the students and we have heard concerns about the level of violence in our schools,” she said.

“In fact, it’s incredibly concerning that the ACT has the highest rates of violence against principals in our schools.”

Ms Lee said it would be up to the individual school or the teacher whether they exercised that option.

“But it was important that there be some other support available to demonstrate to teachers that they are getting the support that they need under a Canberra Liberals government,” she said.

Yvette Berry with primary kids

Minister for Education Yvette Berry with children from Ainslie Primary School. Ms Lees says the Minister had ignored the expert evidence for years. Photo: ACT Government.

On the $200 vouchers, which will be in addition to basic school resource funding, Ms Lee said every teacher had their own ideas about what they wanted to see in the classroom and some were spending their own money to top up their supplies.

“We acknowledge that we value the contribution they make, and we want to give the teachers the autonomy to have a bit of flexibility about the additional classroom supplies that they’d like to see in their classroom for their teaching,” she said.

They will also inject an additional $25 million into school maintenance to bring every government school up to minimum standards when it comes to heating, cooling and toilets, as well as bring the ACT’s Property Quality Standards guide up to date ahead of an audit of all ACT Government schools.

Me Lee said this would ensure a systemic and transparent process to futureproof school infrastructure needs.

She also committed to a feasibility study of a vertical or multi-storey school in the inner north where school populations were booming.

“This is an area that has been one of the fastest growing, and we know that there is a landlock, and there’s been concern about some of the schools, including Lyneham High, that are at or reaching capacity.

“We need to make sure that we build the school infrastructure that a growing Canberra needs.”

Ms Lee said a stocktake of available land would be required but suggested Dickson College’s footprint could provide a site for a new high school, which would probably suit a multi-level format.

She said all growth areas would be looked at, including the growing town centres of Woden and Belconnen, where population pressures are also building.

READ ALSO Ketamine a rising drug of choice in Canberra as CanTest marks two years

Ms Lee said Ms Berry had been dragged kicking and screaming to agreeing to the literacy and numeracy inquiry after ignoring years of alarms being raised about sliding standards.

She said one in three 15-year-olds in the ACT are not meeting the national benchmark when it comes to reading.

“She has ignored for years now the expert evidence which proved time and time again that explicit instruction is the way to go,” she said.

Ms Lee said Labor and the Greens had let down a generation of students in Canberra.

“We want to make sure that every Canberra student has access to the best education system in Australia,” she said.

Join the conversation

18
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Seems like a good set of policies, well done Elizabeth Lee! Parents are sick of the current state of ACT public schools so the more help our kids and their teachers can get – the better!

This seems good policy and I am looking forward to more to come but as they say, the devil is in the detail. I look forward to Yvette Berry putting a smile on her face and doing better.

Despite Ms Lee’s past hostilities towards the union and particularly the AEU, they are welcoming it. All sounds good to me.

Only one problem! Those right-wing nasties who dominate the party led by Jeremy Hanson. Mr Hanson was the party’s most recent Education spokesperson, before he was spectacularly dumped. He has been sulking away on the backbench, together with his equally hostile and dumped mate Elizabeth Kikkert, ever since. Despite his much flaunted and flawed education policy at the time, this seems to have been dumped as well.

I hope Ms Lee holds her policy dear and does not let the party’s nasties get their hands on it should they win this year’s Territory election.

Who knows what would happen next?
Dead, buried and cremated?

David Pollard - Independent for Yerrabi12:46 pm 22 Aug 24

A contest of viable and desirable policy is what we’ve been missing for a long time, so I also welcome the direction.

One way the community can ensure policies are followed through on is having independents elected with the mandate of holding them to what they said. Having sensible, moderate independents is also a way to formally reject the right-wing elements and foster the moderate elements in the liberal party.

Although unlikely, I have deep concerns at IFC winning government and balance of power in the ACT. The IFC anti-government rhetoric and candidates flip flopping around on issues claiming to be moderate is hollow.

You claim that IFC aims to bring a contest of viable and desirable policy ideas into our parliament. However, I am perplexed at IFC’s lack of understanding of our city’s political, parliamentary and legislative processes.

Disappointing to read some of your party’s rhetoric in the media and your candidate in Brindabella, Vanessa Picker’s anti-government tirade and put down of Tuggeranong in these pages yesterday.

The IFC joining with the Liberals in refusing to support or commit to our government’s social policies including health and the expansion of the nurse-led walk-in centres as well as the free meals program in our public schools to assist those most in need is also disappointing.

The government’s social policies have benefited and will continue to benefit all Canberrans including Tuggeranong residents into the future.

David Pollard - Independent for Yerrabi4:42 pm 22 Aug 24

IFC candidates have not “joined with the liberals and refused to support” nurse led walk in clinics, nor meals in schools. In both cases you will find candidates who spoke out on those (I was quoted regarding both) that we generally like the policies and want to see them succeed and grow.

What we don’t want though is to blindly follow through with *any* policy or program, without adequate evidence to back them up.

If you – like me – believe that the nurse led walk in clinics would stand up to scrutiny, then there should be nothing to fear from a review. I would not support any review that has a pre-conceived outcome to dismantle these programs. The difference I want to see in the assembly though is I also would not support any review with a pre-conceived outcome of bolstering any program. I just want the truth to speak for itself.

Gregg Heldon9:00 pm 22 Aug 24

You’ll have to excuse Jack, he’s crazy. His rants are helping people to vote for anyone but Labor.
Like the one about Vanessa Picker putting Tuggeranong down. She wasn’t. She was just pointing out that Tuggeranong has been neglected by the current Labor government. The majority of Tuggeranong residents would agree.

It’s best to understand that “Jack D” isn’t a real person, but a propaganda account run by ACT Labors social media team.

Thankfully Gregg Heldon we live in a democracy and the election is only 56 days away and you can make your intentions clear then, which I am sure you will do.

As to my perceived craziness, I was always told that it takes one who holds such qualities to distinguish them in others.

From my observations the IFC do not stack up. Their flip-flopping around and vagueness on what they actually stand for is a concern. It was only yesterday, one candidate was criticising the government’s inquiry system in feedback in these pages. Our committees of inquiry have one of the most important roles in the Assembly considering issues in more detail. They are one of our principal methods of inquiry where the public and advocacy groups can raise issues. Final reports and recommendations are tabled in the assembly for consideration and debate. Recent inquiries undertaken include gambling and drug reforms, property development and environmental and bushfire preparedness.

Vanessa Ticker’s tirade is not the type of rhetoric I have seen from successful independents and a turnoff. I have fond memories of Tuggeranong and am a regular visitor. Of course improvements can be made to areas of it, they always can be as with anywhere in Canberra. It is a large district. Despite the whingeing from Liberal representatives and their supporters, it is a hundred times better than what it was when they were in government and when I was living there. There are current projects underway and into future which include extending light rail from Gungahlin. This development will transform Woden and Tuggeranong but has been bitterly opposed by the Liberals who are taking us back to the future of bus travel and our fourth election on the issue!

My rates have gone up more than 7% p.a. on average over the last 12 years and Barr’s budget says government taxes & charges are increasing around another 7% this year. At least the Libs are saying they’ll cap rates increases at a maximum of 2.2% p.a.

This was supposed to be a reply to mjnyc’s comment

But no one will reduce the highest rates in Australia…..

David Pollard - Independent for Yerrabi12:19 am 22 Aug 24

Most of this sounds good. Labor/Greens are weak on education, so it isn’t hard to make improvements.

The $200 vouchers to teachers is a slap in the face though! It’s a drop in the bucket for expenses that should be covered in the ACT Budget. Dressing it up under the guise of teacher autonomy is rubbish – there are straightforward ways to achieve that without expecting teachers to fund this themselves.

@David Pollard I was listening to ABC radio this morning and the Education Union were chuffed with the announcement from the Liberals. With respect would assume they are a bit more across it than yourself. Not too many unions come out in support of liberal announcements so it was a surprise.

People are beginning to notice what I said right from the beginning. These are stealth Lab/grn candidates. They will keep Barr in power if elected.

David Pollard – no there aren’t straight forward ways to fund the minor classroom materials that teachers use because they make their own choices on what works for them. Trying to have the school or directorate fund those items directly is a recipe for massive over supply of some items that never get used and under supply of others, still leaving individual teachers out of pocket.

David Pollard - Independent for Yerrabi12:12 pm 22 Aug 24

There are pretty easy ways to have teachers still in control of the actual purchasing, without expecting them to foot the bill. The problem isn’t in the logistics, it’s in the funding. I’ve heard from teachers who spend hundreds or thousands of their own money on classroom supplies – that’s not sustainable, and it’s not good enough.

David Pollard - Independent for Yerrabi12:31 pm 22 Aug 24

Most of the announcement looks good – some of it really good. It looks much more committed to public education than labor/greens (which is surprising indeed).
The vouchers part of their plan acknowledges a big problem, but I think it’s a bad solution. It still leaves teachers out of pocket, or classrooms under-resourced – neither is acceptable.
I didn’t hear the unions comments so will have to follow that up. I’m not surprised they are generally receptive of the plan, but I’m sure there are bits that they would change.

David Pollard - Independent for Yerrabi12:38 pm 22 Aug 24

I don’t understand this perspective. What would be the point of spending so much of my time, energy, and money just to keep the status quo? Most independents are in this space because we aren’t happy with what we’ve got. The specific change that different independents want may vary, but the fact that they want change is pretty universal.
Some independents may feel they could or couldn’t work with a particular party, but from my experience, most (including me) are open to anything as long as they are able to represent their community. It’s up to the major parties to prove they can accommodate us, not the other way around.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.