18 October 2024

ACT election candidates who would scrap Woden light rail revealed

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
10
Light rail vehicle parked at Alinga Street station

Plans to extend light rail to Woden has divided candidates. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

An advocacy group that promotes public transport has revealed the names of six ACT election candidates who would vote to terminate an extension of light rail to Woden.

The ACT Government has promised to extend the light rail network from Commonwealth Park to Woden. It aims to complete the project by 2033.

The Public Transport Association of Canberra (PTCBR) also wants to see this project come to fruition and sent out a survey to all 149 candidates running in this Saturday’s election.

PTCBR asked the candidates: “In a hypothetical vote in the ACT Legislative Assembly, how would you vote on a motion to immediately and permanently stop all work on Light Rail Stage 2B (Commonwealth Park to Woden)?”

Twenty-six candidates responded to the request, of which six said they would vote to cease work on the project – Canberra Liberals Mark Parton and Amardeep Singh, independents Rima Riab and Janine Haskins, the Belco Party’s Bill Stefaniak and Animal Justice Party candidate Robyn Soxsmith.

The Canberra Liberals’ official party position is to scrap the Woden light rail project, which it says will cost more than $5 billion. Leader Elizabeth Lee has argued more bus lanes and rapid routes will be better measures to improve transport to the southside.

The remaining 20 survey respondents said they would vote to continue the Woden light rail project. This included a host of ACT Greens and Independents for Canberra candidates and two Animal Justice Party candidates. ACT Transport Minister Chris Steel also indicated Labor’s support.

PTCBR chair Ryan Hemsley said those who did not respond to the survey included candidates from Family First and the Fiona Carrick independents.

He said it was important candidates were upfront about their views on Canberra’s biggest ever infrastructure project.

“Canberra voters have every right to expect candidates standing for election to be transparent about their views on issues such as light rail,” Mr Hemsley said.

READ ALSO ‘Just doing my job’: Bushnell responds to being flipped off by Liberals leader

He said despite multiple attempts through a variety of channels, PTCBR was unable to secure responses from various high-profile candidates.

“We reached out several times to the Fiona Carrick independents through a variety of means and did not get a response from any of their candidates.

“This survey provided an opportunity to get her views on the record and it’s disappointing they didn’t take up this opportunity.”

Ms Carrick told Region she did not answer the survey because it was impossible to give a simple yes or no answer to such a question without having all the information.

“I just want to see really good public transport, I’m mode agnostic, I want to see the underpinning analysis that says where light rail is appropriate and where dedicated bus lanes are appropriate for commuter services,” she said.

“At the moment, it’s just so piecemeal. There is no underpinning analysis about what the best public transport is for Tuggeranong, Weston Creek or Molonglo.

“Nobody has been able to tell me what services people will get or how reliable they’ll be. We can’t just say yes or no until we know the answers to these questions.”

READ ALSO Batik Air suspends its Canberra to Bali flights just four months after launch

The PTCBR survey also asked candidates how often they used public transport in Canberra.

The results revealed most respondents were not frequent users of public transport, but many would be more likely to catch public transport if services were more frequent.

Full results of the survey can be found on the PTCBR website.

Join the conversation

10
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

It is disappointing that this article has been published this late in the electoral cycle after pre-poll commenced and the day before the election. Fiona Carrick has always evaded questions about the light rail and refused to commit her support to the project!

Ms Carrick’s running mates Marea Fatseas and Bruce Paine are vehemently opposed to light rail and ran as independents in the 2020 election with Nimby and anti-development agendas!

Very disappointing that neither Fiona Carrick nor her two running mates, Bruce Paine and Maria Fatseas, bothered to respond to the survey on public transport. Other independents and minor parties, for example Anne-Louise Dawes (Independents for Canberra) and Gwenda Griffiths (Animal Justice Party) managed to provide comprehensive responses, so there is no reason that none of the Fiona Carrick’s independents could be bothered. It can only reflect poorly on their general attitudes towards public transport. A quick glance at Fiona’s website shows platitudes such as “I am focused on great public transport now” (Yeah! aren’t we all) and “We should have the right infrastructure in the right place at the right time to meet the needs of all Canberrans.” Pretty unimpressive stuff.

I dare say candidates might have felt more open to answering the questions if…… the PTCBR were a little less biased on their website, a little more open to providing accurate information about how Stage 1 is being used by passengers and paid for by taxpayers, provided accurate information on the costs of 2A and didn’t have such a leading survey question as “ In a hypothetical vote in the ACT Legislative Assembly, how would you vote on a motion to immediately and permanently stop all work on Light Rail Stage 2B (Commonwealth Park to Woden)?”.

It’s not biased for a public transport lobby group to put their views on public transport on their website. They are transparent about being a lobby group. That’s what a lobby group does. As to the questions on the survey, most of the parties, major and minor, responded and enough independents responded to get an idea of what their views on public transport are. As to the specific question on light rail, considering that the other major party in this election, the Liberal Party, have said they will do just that (stop all work on Stage B) then of course it is a relevant question to ask other candidates if they would support or oppose such a vote. If they are undecided at this stage, then they can just say so (and some respondents did and also explained why). However, to not respond at all (particularly as Stage 2B is being proposed to be constructed in the Murrumbidgee electorate and the Fiona Carrick independents are running only in Murrumbidgee) is not transparent and sends a message to prospective voters that they’re not interested.

Why would Fiona Carrick openly support Light Rail to Woden without a costing and a business case?

Light Rail 1.7km extension to Commonwealth Park, costs $577 million in rail construction, with the other associated design, administrative , vehicle and groundwork’s like raising London circuit adding anywhere from $400 million to $800 million in additional costs.

When Mr Barr can only publicly concede that Light Rail to Woden will cost hundreds of millions, when it’s clear that it will cost multiple Billions and he’s trying to hide costs from voters, it’s no wonder Ms Carrick would be loathe to respond to yet another one sided Public Transport Canberra Light Rail survey regarding their passion project.

Fiona Carrick’s position on the Light Rail is detailed on her website and stands pretty much alone as one candidate who wants to take a holistic and evidence based position on Public Transport in the ACT.

The simple positioning from the Light Rail lobby group (their fake name still fools no one) is part of the problem with this project and the way it is framed to the public.

Could we have a bus with signage saying that it identifies as a light rail. And use the billions for health and education.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.