4 December 2024

ACT Catholic schools show the way in My School rankings

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
11

St Clare of Assisi Primary School principal Matt Egan-Richards observes a Year 3 paired fluency lesson where one student reads a passage while a partner follows and provides help if needed. Photo: Kylie Coll/Catholic Education.

Catholic primary schools have dominated the top 20 places in the My School rankings for the ACT out today, attributing their success to the Catalyst explicit teaching program instituted three years ago.

The Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) My School website has been updated today with 2024 NAPLAN data and other school information for parents to view.

Its rankings are based on an Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA), which indicates the average educational advantage of each school’s students.

READ ALSO Parker quits UC, Barr proposes Auditor-General probe governance

Thirteen out of the 20 ACT schools are run by Catholic Education Canberra and Goulburn, which director Ross Fox said was an exciting endorsement of what their teachers and principals were doing.

Mr Fox said the overwhelming majority of CECG schools had embraced Catalyst, and they were now seeing the results.

“But we don’t think we’re finished in terms of the improvement we can pursue and the high aspirations we can have for students,” Mr Fox said.

“We’ve got access to other data that’s very encouraging about the impact on achievement we’re having in the early years, and we think over time we’ll see that advancement in learning consolidate and result in higher achievement in later years.”

St Clare of Assisi Primary School in Conder, which ranked eighth, started its explicit learning journey, including phonics, five years ago, but joined its fellow schools when Catalyst was adopted.

Principal Matt Egan-Richards said he had identified shortcomings in reading and writing, but since taking up a more systemic and high-impact approach, first with one program and then Catalyst, there had been a steady, although not always linear, improvement.

Mr Egan-Richards said that by the time kinder children got through to year three, teachers were finding they had a much higher skill base to work with.

“So we can spend more time on exploring other things and learning other things rather than having the biggest focus on learning literacy,” he said.

The school’s teacher-librarian had also reported a wider range of books being borrowed because children were keen to explore more challenging reads.

Mr Egan-Richards said there were also fewer behavioural issues in the classroom due to a more structured approach and settled routine, and children having learning success.

He said revision also played an important role in the school’s learning approach.

“Part of what we do now is we’re very aware that you can’t move on until you’ve revised it, touched over it, reviewed it several times,” Mr Egan-Richard said.

That process occurred with decreasing frequency over the year.

Mr Egan-Richards praised Catholic Education for its research, curriculum materials, and support from external coaches.

“It’s great to have people who are knowledgeable and experienced and know the research to come in and actually spend one-on-one time with our teachers in our classrooms,” he said.

Teachers also worked collaboratively, discussing how their students were progressing, asking questions such as: what haven’t they learned? What do they need to learn? How are we going to make sure they learn it?

Mr Fox said the My School list reflected the improvement that CECG schools had seen, the engagement of its teachers in professional learning, their change to practice, the curriculum support put in place and the efficient assessment.

“So, yes, we’re making good progress in that way,” he said.

Mr Fox also noted the context of the My School list and the wide geographic range of the schools on it.

“I’m really excited that it’s not the community or the socio-economic background that should determine academic results. It’s the quality of the teaching. It’s the learning of the students,” he said.

Join the conversation

11
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Much depends on the teachers, the principal and the way the school is run.

I’ve seen the best in public schoolos and was lucky enough to attend one of those, as well as the worst. My progress very much depended on the quality of the teacher in working with kids. I’ve seen the same issue with Catholic schools.

One of the advantages of having to move frequently is the ability to see many options and their success/failure as well as why.

I’d like to know how good these schools are at dealing with neurodivergent children and parents, as I’m seeing some problems in this area in public schools, perhaps because of staff shortages and under-funding, but also because of a lack of training and understanding of neurodiversity.

ACT Catholic schools have around 1 in 6 kids on personalised learning programs, which I believe is the terminology for addressing the education of kids who are neurodivergant, have ADHD or are physically or mentally disabled.

As for underfunding, whenever I’ve looked at the funding levels for nearby public and catholic primary schools, the public schools have been operating on more funding per student. Also, it should be noted that the ACT is the only jurisdiction to fund public schools over the resourcing standard. If you’re seeing shortages and shortcomings, I think the question should be asked of the minister as to where the money’s going if not to providing the staff and training required.

Capital Retro1:37 pm 04 Dec 24

Amazing what a bit of divine intervention can do.

It wouldn’t be hard to beat the public schooling system. Designed in Prussia to fail people from the start and exported to the West by the likes of John Dewey – who literally wanted to transform America into the Soviet Union – what use is it, I ask you, in knowing how to think to those who want to instil radical collectivism?

Public schooling: yet one more thing in society that’s not an unquestionable good.

How shocking, remove the government from the equation and things improve….

Stop public funding private schools and direct the money to government schools and things improve…

Every school child shoyld get the same amount of government funding.

If their parents then decide to top up that funding to provide more facilities, that’s up to them. This constant whine about public funding of private schools is ridiculous. It’s akin to saying people who have private health insurance shouldn’t be allowed to use Medicare.

No they shouldn’t.

Your opinion, as usual, is wrong and irrelevant.

Seano, Catholic schools are not like Grammar or Radford. They often operate on less money per student than ACT public schools, even with the school fees. Also, ACT public schools are not underfunded. They are funded above the standard resourcing level and the ACT is the only jurisdiction that funds to that level. However, ACT public schools are still producing education outcomes that significantly lag peer schools interstate, despite those other schools having lower funding levels.

The Canberra Liberals proposal for education reform in ACT public schools as released in 2021 was modeled on the Catholic catalyst program. Your beloved Labor-Greens government rubbished it for 3 years until finally agreeing to an inquiry to find out why our public schools were performing so poorly. The findings largely reflected Liberals policy. Labor finally saw the light, but then said they’d only half fund it. Most of the money was to come from within the existing budget, but they declined to reveal what they were cutting.

So it’s not just a matter of throwing more money at ACT public schools, but ensuring there is a minister and directorate that is leading public education in the right direction rather than into the wilderness. Now that the government has been returned, it remains to be seen if there will be any real energy expended in getting ACT public schools back on track. Unfortunately thousands of ACT public school kids have already been left with lesser educations thanks to the decisions of the ACT government, as endorsed by the majority of the electorate.

I didn’t say anything about Catholic or other religious schools Garfield. I can see how it’s problematic not to fund them to a certain degree. Far less public money should go to private schools.

As for “above the standard resourcing level” get a grip. The P&C at our local public school had to fundraise to get air con in some classrooms meanwhile private schools are putting in taxpayer-subsidised lavish facilities. Public schools struggle with to afford the support staff for kids who need remedial help while taxpayer-subsided private school kids want for nothing.

You can pretend it’s a fair and equitable system, but it demonstrably isn’t. Why are battlers who haven’t got it subsiding rich people don’t need it?

“Your beloved Labor-Greens government”….where have I defended the government? Again, get a grip.

I’m ignoring Ken who is clueless as always.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.