Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Skilled legal advice with
accessible & personal attention

ACT public transport unprofitable

By GnT 26 July 2007 49

According to the ABC, the ACT’s public transport system is the least profitable in the country and relies on taxpayers for three quarters of its revenue.

I reckon it’s due to Canberra’s ‘wonderful’ design – all those lovely open spaces which make bus journeys too long and driving a car a far more attractive option. That, and a cultural attitude.

So, any ideas on how ACTION can turn a profit?

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
49 Responses to
ACT public transport unprofitable
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
sepi 10:19 pm 30 Jul 07

Yep – a bus from Russel at 4.30 is brilliant.

Defence knocks off early, and it is after the school run peak hour.

Action claims they can’t run more busses at peak times, but their idea of peak time is 5.00 only.

I’d say run from Russell at 4.30, and from some of the other departments at about 6.00.

Once you get people using the busses they may use them at other times too. Action has cut costs and routes back to the bone to save money and that didn’t work – they need to work on building up their customer base now.

Civic interchage is a long way from where most of the people are in civic these days. Take the busses to the people.

VicePope 5:20 pm 30 Jul 07

Just a vague recollection of a city in Sth America (??Brasilia) where public transport works because the companies providing it get money and more routes and such based on patronage. Hence better operators attract more people and make more money out of it.

Compare ACTION. A monopoly more interested in appeasing the TWU than providing a service.

Ralph 4:25 pm 30 Jul 07

any ideas on how ACTION can turn a profit?

Raise the price.

The biggest problem facing ACTION is that the cost of substitute transport, private cars and bikes, walking, is that it is relatively cheap to travel around Canberra privately.

Unlike Sydney and Melbourne where there are tolls, congestion, and hideous parking fees, you don’t get that here, so ACTION are constrained as to how much they can actually charge for bus travel.

Peak train fares in Sydney and Melbourne aren’t that cheap, but considering the dire state of the trains one way they can improve the service is to increase revenue by jacking up the price big time. An extra $5-$10 each way on some routes and they still won’t be getting close to the cost of driving a car into the city. Political economy issues though.

Maelinar 3:55 pm 30 Jul 07

ACTION can turn a profit.

A full bus all day long will turn a profit for ACTION, provided combined passenger fare is greater than bus on road costs.

ACTION need to work out where to service profitable routes, and market accordingly. If that means putting a bus on the road from Jerrabombera to Russell (Rocket Science moment: Defence Housing owns 1/2 of Jerra, that means about circa 3,000 people want to go to Russell every morning from Jerra, who all have to be at work by 0800, and they all knock off at 1630), that bus route alone will probably pay for 2 extra buses doing crap routes.

All it takes is smart thinking, unfortunately somewhat missing in the current Government environs.

Thumper 3:33 pm 30 Jul 07

Just getting back to GnTs most excellent question, ie, any ideas on how ACTION can turn a profit?

ACTION is not there as a profit making enterprise. It was never supposed to be and never should be.

It is a public service and for all its shortfalls, and there are many, I’m still happy for my tax dollars to go towards the service as long as it is to actually improve it, rather magical time travelling busways.

caf 2:33 pm 30 Jul 07

ChrisInTurner: I offer these constructive criticisms with the aim of assisting you to sharpen your argument:

* Order your arguments by strength. The more easily quantifiable and verifiable arguments should be up first (like your point 1); the more debatable or harder to quantify points should be left to the end (like your point 2).
* Include more references and verifiable figures to bolster your arguments – for example are there white papers / reports on the Geneva , Sydney Olympics and Melbourne Commonwealth Games free public transport projects?
* I think it would enhance your argument to separate out the direct benefits from the flow-on benefits (ie. the benefits that are a result of reduced road congestion).
* Point 3. Is robbery of bus drivers currently a motive for violence on ACTION drivers? Can you obtain any figures on this?
* Point 6. This seems to argue that the total cost of collecting fares is currently equal or greater than the revenue gained from them. If this is really the case then this argument alone should carry the day – and it seems like it would be easy enough to do the sums, but I don’t see anything other than supposition on this point in your paper.
* Points 7 & 8. The “at least 10 years” and “about 10 years” figures seem very rubbery without any supporting evidence.
* Point 10. To be blunt, this seems like a stretch. Even the teenagers who work at maccas are trained to handle cash. Sometimes it’s better to leave out a weak argument entirely, lest it appear to weaken your whole case.
* Point 11. You should explain what jargon like “turn short” means. Also, it is unlikely that you could avoid timetabling of services, because even if the services are frequent enough that the patrons don’t need to know the timetable (that’s already the case with the intertown routes in peak times), a schedule still needs to be created for internal use.
* Points 13 & 14. Combine these into one point. Separating them makes it feel like you’re padding your argument out – which again can give the appearance of weakness.
* Point 15. Isn’t “social capital” the buzzword of the moment for this?
* Another class of potential public-transport user is tourists – if you can argue that free public transport would be attractive to tourists then you may get the tourism lobby on side.

Hope this helps.

bonfire 1:53 pm 30 Jul 07

light rail.

if light rail carried the high capacity peak loads, serviced by buses on suburban routes, the whole network would be more efficient.

and at 3$ a ride – the same as a cup of coffee – its pretty cheap. unless youre going 1km or something ridiculous like that.

avail yourself of a ten-ride ticket, or a monthly if youre a freq user.

i agree civic needs a central transport hub. id put it between melb and sydney bldgs.

people have to stop expecting public transport will make a ‘profit’. if that was the case we’d do away with concessions and charge a rate akin to that which supermarkets charge – we all pay the same for a loaf of bread regardless of our earning capacity.

true costs such as less cars using roads and all associated benefits can never be tied to a bottom line.

bd84 5:30 pm 28 Jul 07

too true sepi.. I have one express bus home if I catch it.. it leaves at 5.08pm other than that I only have 1 other bus that I can get home with without changing, which goes around the longest way possible.. via russell and barton. I’m thinking that these areas should have their own express services to woden and the city anyway.

As for the ticket system, something in the range of $8 million was provided to ACTION for its replacement in this year’s budget.. the period of time needed for developing and implementing it will probably take a while, if the government acted with these funds about 7 years ago when it was first investigated, ACTION would probably be in a better position.. they amount they lose in free rides resulting from the machines breaking down is not even measurable.

ACTION lose most of their money during the day time.. the average price of a ticket is about $1.30 for the elderly people with the concession fares.

and tom-tom is correct, ACTION is ultimately a not-for-profit entity like all other government agencies, they’re there to provide a service not make a profit.

sepi 10:44 pm 27 Jul 07

I think the busses should extend their ‘peak’ times. They seem to think everyone want to be at work at 9.00, and leave at 5.00. Most people stay at work later than that these days. I’d like to see busses running directly from public service offices from 6.00 onwards.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site