Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Opinion

Expert strata, facilities & building management services

Affordable Rental: the missing part of the Canberra housing market

By Rebecca Vassarotti 29 June 2017 10

Tried to rent in Canberra recently? If so, you won’t be surprised to learn that Canberra’s rental market is extraordinarily tight. The census data reveal high median rents and the latest figures from Domain confirm it’s a story of high rents and few properties, and one that has not changed for many years.

When we talk about housing affordability, the focus is often on first home buyers and how to enable people to purchase homes. However, with home ownership becoming unattainable for many individuals and households, there is a need to urgently look at how the rental market is working for people with different needs and circumstances.

If you have a low or moderate income, finding something that is affordable to rent outside the public housing system (increasingly becoming the landlord or last resort) in Canberra is almost impossible. We judge affordability against the measure of spending no more than 30% of your income on housing – any more than this, and other essential costs such as food, transport and utilities are hard to cover. Anglicare’s Rental Affordability Snapshot that was released in April found that there were very few rental properties on the market in Canberra for people who were on low incomes. One example is a family of four that had two minimum wage incomes coming into the household. For this household type, there were only 2.3% of advertised properties that met your needs and would not put you in housing stress.

It doesn’t have to be this way. There are things that could be done locally to create and stimulate this missing part of the market – that is creating housing stock that sits between market-based private rental and public housing.

We are not going to solve this issue without addressing supply. While there are a small group of community-based housing providers that are building and renting homes that can be offered below market rent, they cannot do this at scale under the current policy settings. If we are serious about creating housing that is affordable we need to work out ways that we can deliver land more cheaply to enable the development of properties that are available for a more affordable rental than what the market currently offers. There are many ways that we could do this. One option is for the Government to provide land at discounted rates to providers who will use the land to build housing stock to be rented below market rent. Another is to create government, community, and partnerships where all parties can come together to deliver affordable rental stock.

We also need to think about where this supply is and to ensure that there are incentives in place so affordable housing can be offered in both greenfield sites and as part of urban renewal. We need to ensure that we see affordable rental options along the north and south light rail corridors so we can see employees in service and retail industries able to live close to jobs, schools, services and transport.

Design can go a long way to addressing affordability. Products can be developed that use clever design to reduce the cost of building, that create options for individuals to share accommodation without giving up independent spaces and privacy or pick up new housing trends such as tiny houses. Flexible planning needs to play its part in enabling this in a way that does not erode the integrity of streetscape.

We also need to create interest for potential investors to invest in affordable housing products. We have seen a not-for-profit real estate company established in Melbourne and there are small investors who could be interested in reasonable returns that affordable housing investment models could deliver. We know that there is work occurring nationally and hopefully there will soon be federal incentives through mechanisms such as supply bonds and tax concessions. There is a real opportunity for local planning to occur so that we can see the most of these incentives when they emerge so that we can increase the numbers of affordable rentals in the ACT.

These are just some ideas but there are many others. What do you think we need to do to ensure everyone can have a safe home in Canberra, even if they are not high-income earners?

Rebecca is a board member of Community Housing Canberra, a not-for-profit affordable housing organisation.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
10 Responses to
Affordable Rental: the missing part of the Canberra housing market
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
ThePickle 2:41 am 25 Aug 18

The other point I would like to make here is that land tax is killing affordable rent. My example is: I live in a 65 year old 2 bedroom house on an expensive block of land so my rates are really high. I have looked into building a granny flat in the backyard and rent it out to not only provide inner city affordable housing for someone but to help me offset the high rates and provide a bit of pocket money in my future retirement. However, I am then subject to land tax of nearly $10,000 per annum in addition to my $5,500 in rates. (That’s a total of nearly $300 per week). This additional tax burden makes the whole thing unfeasible. These high rates and taxes are killing any incentive to provide affordable housing options by people like me who would happily do so if it made financial sense. The ACT Government needs to reduce taxes on housing.

    Maya123 10:35 am 25 Aug 18

    Exactly. That’s why I wrote, “Land tax needs to be based on the rent received, not the value of the land.”
    Two houses side by side, one an old two bedroom place and the other a huge new five bedroom MacMansion. Huge difference in rent, but both pay the same land tax. The cheaper rental property stops being rented leaving only the high rent place. Way to lock low income people out of the rental market. Completely inequitable situation.

Maya123 10:45 am 23 Aug 18

Land tax needs to be based on the rent received, not the value of the land, so as not to discourage cheaper rents.

The old hostel system was good as an alternative to renting a whole house (I lived for a time in a couple of examples), at least for people without children, especially younger people starting out on lower incomes. Pity it doesn’t exist now. I think some hostels, such as the old Hotel Acton, might have had some accommodation for families too.

ThePickle 6:55 am 23 Aug 18

From a small time investors point of view it is difficult to make a property, especially a house with land, in the ACT pay for itself, never mind make a profit mainly due the extraordinarily high land tax and rate bills. I pay $9,000 per annum or 36% of the rent received in taxes – (rates, land tax and water charges) of a house I rent out. The Government needs to encourage more investors by lowering taxes and therefore increase available properties (Particularity houses with land that would suit families). This will increase supply and reduce rents. Simple!

    JC 7:51 pm 23 Aug 18

    36% that can then be used as a tax deduction against salary.

    Besides few ever make an operating profit of a rental property. The main game and area of profit is the capital gain when it is eventually sold plus of course the ability to offset expenses against all income rather than just income from the property.

    Maya123 9:13 am 24 Aug 18

    More profitable to make a profit, and there are still the expenses to offset. I used to have a rental property and it was only a few short years before I was making a profit.

    ThePickle 2:22 am 25 Aug 18

    Yes that is true, you can still currently offset local government taxes and other property hold costs against Federal income tax but the end result is you are still out of pocket. Negative gearing is a mugs game if you ask me as you are really just robbing Peter (The Federal Government) to pay Paul (the ACT Government) so to speak. Depreciation of a newer place is the only real bonus tax deduction because you get a real tax deduction from an unreal (Not out of pocket) expense. But that is not my point – My point is more that you don’t get cheaper housing by taxing it more – quite the opposite. If the Government was serious about cheaper housing for low income earners then they should look at reducing taxes and charges on housing.

Grail 1:09 pm 04 Aug 17

Rather than specially earmarking land for affordable housing, what about progressive taxation given rental incomes. The ACT can’t modify federal tax benefits for negative gearing, but we can make territory taxes on properties scale to the income derived from that property.

To increase interest in affordable housing, the ACT might consider a scheme similar to Defence Housing Association, where properties selected by the ACT are released for sale to investors with low guaranteed returns, with the ACT serving as property manager.

We could also update housing standards to ensure that houses built in Canberra are affordable to live in (so no large unshaded windows facing North, for example).

The rate of aparment construction in Canberra is helping ensure that apartment prices are kept reasonably low. As an example I bought my apartment in Holt for $350k ten years ago and it is still worth $350k, with similar property around Canberra selling for $345k in Watson through to $800k in Turner.

“Clever design” must not make housing less affordable to live in. Building a house out of expanded polystyrene foam might reduce the cost of construction, but it drastically increases the maintenance cost and flammability.

Requiring all homes built in Canberra to meet minimum standards such as external doors that seal, walls that are weather sealed and insulated, double glazing on all windows, and other features commonly found in similar climates such as Canada, will mean that the cost of the features comes down. Rather than $1000 per window for double glazing, the increased scale might bring prices closer to $300.

As for public housing, I’d suggest providing rental support to tenants rather than government owning properties directly.

    Maya123 10:34 am 23 Aug 18

    Grail wrote, “We could also update housing standards to ensure that houses built in Canberra are affordable to live in (so no large unshaded windows facing North, for example).”

    That’s how solar houses work, by having large windows facing north. It makes the house warmer in winter, and because the sun is higher in summer the sun doesn’t come in at all on the shortest day, and not much on the other days. All houses should be designed to face north to make them more energy efficient. Living in a house with large northern unshaded windows (except by inside blinds) I have not had to heat my house at all this last winter in the daytime (mostly 20C plus inside with no heating, because of those northern windows) and probably less than ten times at night. In summer, because the sun is higher and doesn’t penetrate the house much, if at all, it’s often not that much a problem, but on the hottest days all I need to do is close the blinds (could be curtains if you have them instead). I have almost no eaves that to allow more winter sun to penetrate. It’s the most comfortable house I have ever lived in and extremely low energy use wise. I need no air-conditioning and very little heating. It’s the opposite of what you wrote. Houses should have large northern windows.

wildturkeycanoe 8:10 am 29 Jun 17

The government cannot even get their own public housing stock to sufficient levels to help those who are homeless, so how can they be expected to lead the rest of the developer community to build enough housing stock for disadvantaged families? Census data just showed that Canberra’s population just exploded recently. What is that going to do to rental prices? Of course it is going to pressure them upwards, with more demand than availability. With all the construction going on with the tram corridor development, builders will be quite happy at charging significant prices for new housing and it will be difficult to find any builders who are struggling for work. This means you won’t get any cheap labour to reduce the costs of housing any time soon. The same goes for materials, which will be in high demand, so you won’t be able to save there either. Knock down rebuild options on older properties in the ACT are money makers, so it’d be hard to find any existing land that is affordable to purchase, whilst the micro-blocks being released in new suburbs are so overpriced, nobody can make it affordable for moderate income families.
Face it people, you can not live in Canberra unless you are earning nearly a six figure salary or you share your living costs with other people. Families can’t do this, so they are being forced to move interstate. Real estate agents also won’t consider a low income tenant because of the fact they will struggle to make the rent payments on time. While there is an abundance of wealthier candidates out there, the poor have little chance of getting a rental, as there will no doubt be someone else who can offer the landlord ten or twenty dollars a week more. The system sucks.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site