Skip to content Skip to main navigation


Buying or selling? Get the right advice

For some, the end begins now.

By Skidbladnir - 22 January 2008 56

ABC Online: NCA cuts 30 jobs
More than 30 jobs have been slashed from the National Capital Authority (NCA) under the Rudd Government’s proposal to slash the federal bureaucracy…

ABC Online: PM to continue public service cuts despite $3b windfall
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says a $3 billion windfall inherited from the Howard government will not stop his government making massive savings within the federal bureaucracy…

Canberra times Online: Rudd’s PS cuts to boost surplus
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has pledged further sweeping cuts to Government spending and the public service to deliver a budget surplus of at least $16 billion…

While it is nice to see some heads roll at the NCA, how do you cut $13 billion out of the existing public service?

What’s Your opinion?

Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
56 Responses to
For some, the end begins now.
Mælinar 2:46 pm 22 Jan 08

I’ll happily accept a redundancy package. World domination does not start in the public service.

fnaah 1:53 pm 22 Jan 08

Open Source software.

(okay, so i’m trolling a bit. :P)

Ingeegoodbee 1:47 pm 22 Jan 08

Sorry, should have been Neanderthalsis rather than Thumper.

VicePope 1:46 pm 22 Jan 08

I’d agree that there is a lot of fat in consultancies and outsourcing. But some of it would need to be done anyway – although public servants would usually be cheaper. One could make savings by reducing the effort going to the rear end of agency activities (some accountability stuff, but an awful lot of permanenet structures to deal with short-term problems). Most government information campaigns, even when not overtly political, have been a poorly directed waste of money. A bit of rationality about buildings would save a lot.

And then there are programs. Minor tweaks in social security for the more affluent aged or a critical approach to funding of public/private things (eg hospitals and child care) would be useful as would restructuring education funding to provide a standard contribution related to other school income. Be critical about some of the less worthwhile universities and their airier programs.

As a proposition, if Defence buys something for, say, $1b and that includes mistakes, delays and fudges worth $400m, why shouldn’t Defence have to find the lost money. And there’s been a hell of a lot of that kind of thing. Defence is probably the worst, but it’s not the only offender.

One thing that should be done if there must be losses is pool those who may lose their jobs and reallocate them where they can work. The 1996-97 and later redundancies led to (a) a massive number of expensive and variably useful consultants and (b) a huge loss of talent, much of which found its way back in after a couple of years. It was an utter waste of resources.

Ingeegoodbee 1:45 pm 22 Jan 08

I can see it now Thumper. The tax cuts will go ahead, but they’ll scrap the childcare rebate and the health insurance subsidy – to support the whole thing, they’ll produce a consultants reporty that found that people preferred tax cuts to hand outs because it allowed them to choose how to spend their money. The tax cuts will get swallowed up on covering the cost of health insurance and childcare.

neanderthalsis 1:41 pm 22 Jan 08

A quick check down the back of the sofas netted some Little Kev some $3b in unspent funds last week.

There seems to be a fair bit of fat that can be trimed from the operational budgets of a number of Depts as well as cuts to projects / programmes, esp in defence, DEEWR and FaCSIA.

Still, Wayno came out and said that they will go ahead with $31b in tax cuts despite their search for dollars and the so called war on inflation.

Thumper 1:29 pm 22 Jan 08

Consultants and contractors come from a different bucket of money, thus it appears that savings a re being made in asl, when in fact, it actually costs more.

roccon 1:19 pm 22 Jan 08

I am happy to consult on how to best cut back on consultants. Give me money now !!

Mr Evil 1:15 pm 22 Jan 08

Toriness, wash your mouth out! 🙂

toriness 1:01 pm 22 Jan 08

get rid of overpriced consultancies – who are simply ex-public servants who have left the APS to work for a consultancy firm then are hired back to do the same work for 3 times the price

Mr Evil 1:01 pm 22 Jan 08

“…how do you cut $13 billion out of the existing public service?”

Sack everyone, then replace them with consultants!

Ingeegoodbee 12:50 pm 22 Jan 08

“…how do you cut $13 billion out of the existing public service?”

Cut programmes. Ditching ASL isn’t going to get you close. Defence, health, social security are the big government spenders so the most fat can be trimmed from these areas. The government might look at walking away from a number of Defence contracts, they could probably lose some of the middle class welfare like the baby bonus, health insurance rebate and the childcare rebate – then you could put some spin on the way the $13 billion will be calculated – instead of digging up a lump sum, you say it’s calculated over the term of the government so the amount you’re looking for becomes $4.3 billion a year (assuming a three budget government).

Given the difficulty the APS is facing in recruiting at present I doubt that the former NCA bods will have too much trouble finding somewhere to hand their cardigan – actually, for NCA types it would probably be a black lambswool or cashmere polo neck …

Thumper 12:45 pm 22 Jan 08



Thumper 12:44 pm 22 Jan 08

DFAT are losing $57 million I believe from there OS budget.

Skidbladnir 12:44 pm 22 Jan 08

YEs, I realise that the article does mention “Government spending -and- the public service”, but the pre-election buildup seemed to play up more about the increase to spending (smaller than Liberals yes, but still an increase to costs), tax cuts (decreased income)and the promised razor gang (the promised decreased expensing).

1 2 3 4

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | |

Search across the site