15 August 2024

Geocon pioneers battery power at 'tricky' Civic construction site

| James Coleman
Join the conversation
28
Man checking plugs connected to power box

Geocon employs two of these 300 kVA batteries at The Grande construction site in Civic. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Construction sites draw an enormous amount of power, and up until recently, there have only been a couple of options for getting it.

Large diesel generators can provide up to 9000 watts to power things like power tools and cranes, but even larger generators that churn out well over 10,000 watts are often the go-to for industrial-sized properties.

Alternatively, the local energy provider may be able to rig up a temporary connection between the site and the nearest substation.

However, neither of these was particularly desirable for Geocon’s up-and-coming development.

READ ALSO Developer licensing puzzle needs to be carefully pieced together

The Grande on London will comprise 332 residential apartments and three commercial tenancies across three buildings and eight levels when it’s completed in late 2025.

But it’s nestled in a tight spot on the cloverleaf between Allara Street and London Circuit in the very heart of the city.

Or as Geocon’s project director Hugo Villano says, “We’re in a tricky location in Canberra”.

“We’re right in the middle of the CBD. There’s really only one entry to the building. and we have a number of adjoining interfaces … and the light rail project is one of our neighbours.”

Construction on The Grande on London is set to finish by late 2025. Photo: Geocon.

Evoenergy established a connection with the nearest substation, but being in the middle of Canberra, the local electricity network was already running at close to capacity, and the power wasn’t quite enough.

And generators are “never a great outcome”.

“They’re obviously quite taxing on fuel costs and space on site – they’re quite large – and bloody noisy as well,” Hugo says.

And while the inner-city neighbours are accustomed to the noise of living in the city, “I’m sure would appreciate not having to listen to a generator”.

Crane on construction site with GEOCON branding

The batteries were procured by Titan Cranes. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

The answer lay in batteries.

Geocon has become the first developer in Canberra to employ battery power at its construction sites, after it contracted Titan Cranes to provide the lifting power for the site, which in turn, procured two batteries from New Zealand company Cranepower.

Cranepower offers four different battery units with outputs ranging from 150 kVA to 600 kVA, depending on a site’s power needs.

They’re stored in marine-grade stainless steel boxes and include “advanced heating and cooling systems” so they can safely operate in temperatures between -20 and 45 degrees Celsius and filtration systems to capture “environmental dust, salt and other particulates”.

READ ALSO The Grande on London officially launches, offering front-row access to the best of Canberra’s City Centre

During times when demand is low, the batteries suck power from the grid and store it for when demand is high.

The two 300 kVA batteries at The Grande site replace “up to four generators”, according to Hugo. And with no noise and little space.

“It’s literally just a 1.5-metre high stainless steel container, so it’s one of the most compact batteries on the market,” Hugo says.

“We’re very pleased with that.”

Metal box containing batteries

The battery measures 1.5 metres high. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

He says there was no change to the site’s safety requirements either, as a battery falls under the same standards as a generator as a “large source of energy”. As with a generator, ACT Fire and Rescue is told of its location on the site in case of an emergency.

Hugo says Geocon will “absolutely” look to roll it out across its other Canberra construction sites in future.

“This job is going to be the test for us to make sure it performs as promised, and if it does, absolutely – wherever we need a backup power supply, the batteries will be implemented as opposed to a generator.

“A specific tradesperson might need a smaller generator for a hand tool they might have … but to supply our site with power, we’ll have no generators.”

Join the conversation

28
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Capital Retro8:35 am 19 Aug 24

“And generators are “never a great outcome”.

“……….a battery falls under the same standards as a generator as a “large source of energy”.

Says is all, doesn’t it?

Also, fish have gills but cheetahs can run. Any other wholly unrelated thing you wish to raise?

Capital Retro11:03 am 19 Aug 24

Pathetic response, as anticipated.

Capital Retro, you appear to imagine your comments made sense?

Capital Retro2:34 pm 19 Aug 24

More sense that the quotes in the article, bygone.

Byline,
Capital Retro has a number of times freely admitted to carrying around a full petrol can in the boot of his car, just in case he runs low whilst driving his ICE vehicle around.

Yet he thinks batteries are too much of a safety risk.

I think you can take his perception of what’s “safe” with a tonne of salt.

Capital Retro9:17 am 20 Aug 24

I didn’t mention anything about safety, chewy. Once again you are 400 miles offshore and still drifting.

Capital Retro,
actually you did mention safety, you just aren’t smart enough to realise it. Did you even read the part of the article you’ve quoted from above?

“He says there was no change to the site’s safety requirements either, as a battery falls under the same standards as a generator as a “large source of energy””

Although I understand you may be struggling with basic comprehension not ever having actually resided on this planet.

Power comes from renewables. If the opponents of renewables would stop whiteanting the process with misinformation and secondhand rhetoric designed to line the pockets of a few to the detriment of the many, we would be on our way to achieving our goals. Does coal renew?

Actually, yes. Just very slowly.

Never used a generator on a building site EVER!

So the electricity grid is not upto scratch and we’re installing a light rail.
Whats the power requirements of a light rail car as compared to a crane?

This seems more like a woke puff piece than realistic business decision? Are none of the future developments going to come equiped with EV car chargers.

Its the lack of planning, along with zero plan to role out the upgraded NBN to more than 50% of Canberra. We’re also going to be faced with rolling brownouts!

Upgrading the electricity network takes time and money.

So why would a developer want to upgrade the distribution network for a temporary construction demand?

And why would the utility (ie. us as customers) want to pay for an upgrade to benefit the temporary demand of a developer? Or a future daily demand that doesn’t exist yet and won’t for a number of years?

Makes perfect sense as a business decision on both counts.

At which point of breaking does the network get upgraded? Surely there has been some neglect in the energy sector.

Large sums of money have been spent running new cables to the bus depos for charging.

The network should get upgraded when the demand forecasts requires it. And those upgrades are often paid for by the people who benefit from it, rather than the rest of the customer base.

Evoenergy have a capital contribution charge for exactly that purpose. Who exactly did you think paid for those bus depot upgrades you mention?

Why would you want the electricity company to upgrade the network before it’s needed? It would be just wasting money to do so.

Where does the power come from to charge that battery? This is the idiocy of renewables and all the virtue signallers are doing is shifting the carbon emissions somewhere else. Around 80% of the power going into Canberra is coal-fired generation from NSW. This is especially true when this builder will he charging this battery (at night). STOP IT! You are destroying the planet to so-called save the planet.

Leon Arundell2:36 pm 18 Aug 24

What is the basis for your claim that around 80% of the power going into Canberra is coal-fired generation from NSW?

They literally say it in the article if you bothered to read it. Instead, you have gone off half cocked to have a dig at renewables.

It may be that Geocon, after analysis, decided that this was the most cost-effective way to supply power compared with diesel generators.
Or maybe someone in the office suggested “Hey, let’s irritate that Rob bloke in the Riotact!“

They probably understand energy conversion efficiency, which Rob evidently does not.

Current renewable proportion is about 40%, by the way. Rob’s 20% is just so two years ago, and coal itself is only 47%.

You realise the use of this battery has almost nothing to do with “saving the planet”.

The batteries provide the best option for providing electricity on site that doesn’t conflict with the neighbours living right next to this development.

You’ve gone off on some weird rant about renewables when this is simply about the most practical solution.

Capital Retro9:02 pm 18 Aug 24

It is indicated that the battery draws power from the grid when there is low demand and stores it to use when demand is high. In other words, the owners of the battery will buy cheap power from the grid and sell it at peak times for profit whenever they can but at most times the cranes will be powered by the grid directly.

As you correctly say, Rob up to 80% of the power will be coal generated which makes a mockery of the “Low Carbon UPS” logo on the battery.

Rob does not “correctly” say anything, Capital Retro and nor do you. You appear to have no greater understanding of conversion efficiency than he does.

Geocon is not selling power anywhere else. They are using it on site because their grid connection cannot reliably provide the power needed for the cranes.

As I write, coal is supplying 37% of the NEM load. Over the past 24 hours it was 44% which you can use to estimate that it never got anywhere near 80%; and it never will again, those days are gone. Yet, even if it were 80% or more then it would still be more efficient to do as Geocon is doing than to rely on diesel generators. This is just like a supposedly “coal powered” EV would still be more efficient than an ICE, even before you count the reality that coal provides less than half of our generation capacity and still going down. It is about conversion efficiencies.

How far behind reality do you wish to remain? It might help if we could have an index. Currently the needle stands around 50 years but it could be more.

A clarification of my above post. I referred to black coal only, given Rob relies on NSW. Adding brown (Victoria) would not change the general picture nor, most importantly, the inexorable trend.

Capital Retro11:01 am 19 Aug 24

I said “up to 80%” byline and when solar isn’t available and the wind isn’t blowing and the hydro supply is already allocated, coal generated power has been up to 80%.

And if EV owners can sell power back to the grid so can anyone with a battery (or a pre-purchased allocation). I understand the cost of commercial use electricity from the grid is now cheaper than domestic supplied electrons so that is the icing on the cake.

You are the one that needs a dose of reality.

And in reference to the different coals, why don’t you refer to it generally as “reliable heat generating carbon matter of colour”.

It’s wild to see the complete ignorance on display here

Geocentric have made a business decision because they need reliable power on site for construction activities.

The financial risks of not doing so far outweigh the cost of the temporary battery. The cost of the battery being far cheaper and quicker than upgrading the electricity network in the area.

Other alternatives were not sufficient due to space limitations and the impact of a generator on neighbours.

Just highlights the absolute irrational fear of renewables that certain posters have, even when it’s not related in the slightest.

Capital Retro, you could have said “up to 110%” while being no more silly.

The rest continued your usual irrelevance. Geocon made a sound business decision for their own benefit, and those who cannot cope with reality are sign psi into the wind.

Capital Retro2:38 pm 19 Aug 24

Geocon are there to make money and there is nothing wrong with that even though it is an alien concept to you, byline.

Oh.

If you will excuse me, I have some important laughing to do and it may take a while.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.