10 September 2024

Canberra property market baffles economist, but investors should watch

| Dione David
Join the conversation
43
Birds eye view of The Grande and Canberra City

Canberra’s property market is underperforming despite having all the markers of a strong economy and a notorious undersupply of housing – and these might be prime investment conditions. Photo: Geocon.

As confidence returns to a rattled Australian housing market, Canberra has baffled experts with a market that’s not doing what it should be – and it could present a significant opportunity for savvy investors, according to a leading Australian property economist.

My Housing Market chief economist Dr Andrew J Wilson said while most capital cities had recovered from 2022’s brutal interest rate increases, Canberra was a clear underperformer, particularly through the latter part of 2023.

“We often see a synergy in the Sydney and Canberra markets, but last year we saw that disengage a bit, and in the latter part of last year as Sydney continued to grow steadily, Canberra started to move sideways,” he said.

“After a lengthy period of dovetailing, particularly in the latter part of 2023, Canberra became a clear underperformer.”

READ ALSO ACAT signs off on Geocon’s revised Kingston proposal

Based on the “underlying drivers” behind markets, however, this anomalous underperformance didn’t make sense and was likely to be short-lived.

“It’s counterintuitive that the Canberra market moved sideways because the underlying drivers are still very strong. When you look at the factors behind a strong economic profile – high participation rate, low unemployment, wage growth and average weekly earnings – it’s head and shoulders above other capitals,” he said.

It presented a rare opportunity in a typically top-performing market.

“The fact is that people have to live somewhere, and this is a strong and affluent economy that, despite strong unit development over the past four to five years to alleviate the problem, is notoriously undersupplied,” Dr Wilson said.

“It has the highest wages and strongest economy in terms of the labour market, and a substantial base of the public sector to support it.”

Dr Wilson said a “crisis of confidence” was likely driving the current perplexing market. He pointed to a number of ACT Government policies that were introduced in the second half of last year, and the federal government’s intent to cap the number of overseas students arriving in Australia at 270,000 in 2025.

“There’s no doubt this will affect the strong education market in Canberra, and I think as a result of this Canberra has scared itself into a less-than-positive market,” he said.

On the ground, Geocon Director of Sales and Strategic Partnerships Simon Chester said there were early indicators that Canberra apartments were a solid investment, and pointed to one case study in particular.

“Look at WOVA, where we’ve seen a good number of the 802 units hit the rental market at one time. We control a hundred of those, and 85 per cent of them are already tenanted,” he said.

“November, December and January are key entry runs in the Canberra market – it’s when people are finding out about their APS placements, uni placements, ADFA, RMC etc – they’re starting their new career or studies in January, and getting their accommodation sorted out from November.

“To see 85 per cent of our apartments filled in a quieter period, and just 15 left coming into the busy period, is very pleasing.”

READ ALSO Geocon pioneers battery power at ‘tricky’ Civic construction site

Dr Wilson said he would be watching the Canberra market with keen interest as it entered the strongest time of year – the spring selling market.

Investors, particularly those from interstate markets, should do the same.

“A lot of investors coming into the Canberra market are Sydneysiders who come for the lower price point and higher yields,” he said.

“No doubt it’s a positive market in terms of underlying drivers. It’s gotten a little spooked over the last 12 months, but we’ve had some positive news on inflation rates, with a real shift downwards in July both in headline and underlying inflation. It’s only one month, but that would make the RBA feel a little better, and that bodes well for interest rates.

“I’m not saying there will be cuts – I don’t think that’s on the near horizon. But I think it’s the kind of positive short-term indicator Canberra needs to see in order to rally.”

Disclaimer: The Grande (“the Development”) Illustrations and images are the designer’s impressions only and are subject to change as required by the Developer and by law. No guarantee or warranty is given that the images herein will accurately depict what is constructed. Any view lines shown are indicative only as of the date of publication. Actual views from the Development may vary on completion from that shown and may be impacted by building design changes and current and future developments. Purchasers should rely on their own enquiries before entering into any contract for sale. See website for details. Licence no 18401809 V4 January 2024.

REGION MEDIA PARTNER CONTENT

Join the conversation

43
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Perhaps he is unaware the ACT Greens want to use a public developer to sell and rent homes at a substantial discount to those who would otherwise have to pay market prices, and that ACT Labor Delegates at the party’s annual conference recently endorsed a resolution calling for the ACT government to act as a developer to build new public housing instead of primarily relying on private developers, in accordance with the wishes of the majority of Australians who are in favour of lower house prices and rents.

devils_advocate8:30 am 12 Sep 24

Why is this a problem? Regardless of whether the homes are added by government or the private sector, increasing the supply of homes reduces both purchasing and renting costs.

i’m not at all suggesting it’s a problem. I’m suggesting an economist baffled as to why the ACT’s housing market isn’t racing higher with other cities may be unaware of the policy interventions being seriously contemplated by the parties of government which would in effect take business away from landlords and private developers.

devils_advocate6:47 pm 12 Sep 24

“take business away from landlords and private developers.”

I’m not 100% certain that the scenario you describe (even in the unlikely event that the incompetent clowns could deliver it) would work that way

This is because the people whom would benefit from public housing (to my understanding) would not otherwise be in the private rental or purchasing market

So I don’t think it would directly impact on developers and private landlords, save for a general increase in supply of housing

An impact in supply won’t impact on developers and landlords? Sure pal.

devils_advocate12:33 pm 13 Sep 24

If they are targeting social housing towards individuals who would not otherwise be in the private market, then yes, it may have little or no impact on the private provision of housing, pal.

HiddenDragon7:27 pm 11 Sep 24

“……while most capital cities had recovered from 2022’s brutal interest rate increases, Canberra was a clear underperformer…..”

In recent weeks, at least two of the CEOs of the big four banks have suggested that the RBA cash rate will only fall by about 1.0% (100 basis points for those who prefer the jargon) in total when the rate cuts eventually start – noted economists have offered similar views.

If these forecasts prove to be correct, property investors/speculators who are counting on rates returning to where they were in the years leading up to the pandemic (or even more optimistically, to where they were during the pandemic) are unlikely to be driving a surge in Canberra prices.

Higher (than some are hoping for) longer term interest rates would also, of course, mean higher debt servicing costs for the federal and ACT governments which would presumably constrain public sector spending in this town, and with it demand for Canberra housing.

I don’t think it’s that baffling is it? Gov’t removes half a Billion from the consultancy market…some of those jobs go to the APS but the majority go interstate or just evaporate, impacting the ACT housing market. Obviously ACT house prices have flat lined. Being on post 2025 election to see house prices surge in the ACT.

devils_advocate2:28 pm 11 Sep 24

Why would you want to see house prices surge?

….? I don’t understand your loaded question…? Seriously, are you for real…?

devils_advocate8:26 am 12 Sep 24

This is not a loaded question, it is following from your stated desire to “B[r]ing on post 2025 election to see house prices surge in the ACT”

I’m simply asking why you would want that as an outcome.

@devils_advocate sorry mate, I don’t do interviews.

devils_advocate12:35 pm 13 Sep 24

@Tom Hardy No worries mate, I don’t pay much attention to people that publicly express opinions but are scared to explain them.

Bwahahaaa, scared! Btw it wasn’t an opinion I expressed in this context, I expressed a desire. There’s a difference, and if you can’t understand why someone would want the price of something to increase then perhaps you ought not be on here commenting on matters of economics.

devils_advocate9:30 am 14 Sep 24

A lot of words for someone who can’t even explain why surging house prices is something to “desire”

You plainly articulated your position…although it seems easily inferred. Why shouldn’t prices surge (as they have done in every decade) or why increases in the ACT shouldn’t be desired? What affects you so poorly you would prefer a Marxist outcome. Clearly you’re opposed to Friedman principles.

Economist doesn’t understand something, but makes prediction anyway. The problem with economics, in a nutshell.

Capital Retro1:31 pm 11 Sep 24

Given the number of empty shops and failing businesses in Canberra as well as the consistent low auction clearance rates I suggest that a lot of people are leaving Canberra and heading to warmer climates and cheaper costs of living.
I know several families that have done this recently.

They can join the ones doing the same from as far south as Melbourne. Many people like warmer and cheaper.

devils_advocate11:53 am 11 Sep 24

Always gratifying to see the low-income beneficiaries of the transfer payment system attempting to lecture far more successful individuals on how markets work.

Sometimes it’s just easier to sit back and say “I told you so” when the obvious consequences come back to bite those who, unfortunately, can least afford them.

Do you know any?

Your fall-back of wholly ignorant pronouncements does not conceal that you were unable to deal with a single point I made let alone the whole. The comments I dissected were foolish, and I need not rely on unevidenced vainglorious claims to demonstrate it.

The main drivers are the reduction in contractors/consultants and the recruitment of APS outside Canberra, which has reduced demand. The knock-on effect also reduces the primary dollar for the local economy. As the primary roles are removed, so is the demand for secondary supported jobs, etc. Not only does this reduce prices, but it also reduces opportunities to earn more.

How quaint.

Incidental Tourist apparently believes the purpose of government is to enable income for private landlords.

devils_advocate has quite lost the plot.

If, as devils_advocate likes to claim, landlords can raise rents “with impunity” then there can be zero cause for complaint from landlords about any rental regulation whatsoever — supposedly they can raise the rent to cover all costs and a bit more for injured feelings and time spent writing to Riotact. So, why is that not what is seen in the market today?

Reality is Canberra has the highest vacancy rate in the country and the lowest year-on-year rental increases. Sounds rather like a market working as expected, not as the self-obsessed might wish.

This is largely what has been projected in the past by myself and others here, those who are not utterly devoted to personal enrichment at any cost to the social purse. Marginal landlords find they are better off exiting the market, freeing up stock for home purchasers or more competent investors. Competitive purchasing demand from the tax-advantaged declines slightly (though more can be done federally). The results we see in both the home purchase and rental markets are consistent with this.

Second highest rents in the country.
Highest vacancy rate.
“This is totally a win for communist BS!”

Economic genius on display right there. 🤣

Yes, it is quite amusing to see the self interested rent seekers change their argument to suit no matter what happens in the market.

Particularly when they exalt their Buffet level investment skills whilst constantly whinging about the government not tipping every market setting in their favour and then claiming that everyone who disagrees must be poor.

The “irrefutable” logic of the property spiv.

Amusingly, you need to resort to lying, chewy.

I’ve never said the govetnment need to tip any market setting in anybodies favour. I’ve said the government need to butt out of those markets, because their attempt at pseudo property siezure like communist dictators is costing renters more and stifling inveatment in housing.

The evidence is right there. A country town with delusions of grandeur, with the highest vacancy rate in the country, and rents only slightly below the biggest city in the country. A direct result of government intervention.

Ever noticed median incomes in relation to rents, Ken M, or is that too complex an analysis?

It’s an irrelevant one.

Ken M’s comments in a nutshell.

Incidental Tourist4:19 pm 11 Sep 24

byline – ACT government planed delivering 30,000 new dwellings by 2030. Go check new development approvals on ABS. Since late 2023 new building approvals in ACT are hovering around 50 per month. Now do some maths. With the current trend they hardly deliver a tiny portion of this target. Does it look like a government problem now?

Geocon can’t sell WOVA apartments for a year and ended up renting 100+ of them. Basically they have some $50M+ problem of capital sitting dead just in WOVA project. They are the builder, not “the build to rent” business. Neither they are a bank which sits on a pile of cash. They want their apartments sold and they can’t. Builder renting is as ridiculous as car manufacturer turning to car rentals if they can’t sell cars.

Not to mention selling landlords who can’t manage their investments.

With the current rate of supply do you think that tenants and first home buyers will have a problem soon as well?

So who wins out of these dog’s breakfast populist policies?

Incidental Tourist,
why do you only mention new building approvals for houses in your comment?

Total new building approvals have an average of 330 a month for the last year. Lower than the 10 year average of 420 but not remotely close to your figures. Yes, there is definitely a supply issue but no need to overegg it.

Capital Retro8:25 pm 11 Sep 24

“Geocon allegedly can’t sell WOVA apartments for a year and ended up renting 100+ of them.”
That needs further scrutiny because if Geocon still owns them the ACT government has missed out on a lot of stamp duty revenue and when they are eventually sold they won’t attract the stamp duty concession because they are not new or being sold off the plan.
No one should know the market demand better than Geocon so perhaps they have taken this action because they know there is no market for the product.
No doubt I will be told I am wrong and maybe I am but I would like to hear comments for and against.
This is just Geocon and it may be the tip of the iceberg. I know several people who have 1br investment apartments and they can’t sell them or get a tenant. Appears to be a huge oversupply.

Incidental Tourist, regarding dwelling development approvals, chewy14 has already picked up your discreet deception on the numbers. On WOVA the Geocon Director writes as if pleased about renting 85% of the 100 they control out of 800 total. Presumably you know his view better than him. If you wish to digress further on supply, you had better ask Jack D for the government line. My interests are more on finance and investment, and my comment on your earlier post was that the government owes no investor a living.

Incidental Tourist10:08 pm 11 Sep 24

Chewy14 – What matters is unprecedented drop in new building approvals. See below details.

I refer to ABS table 87310019.xls. (Table 19. Number of dwelling units approved, by sector, original – Australian Capital Territory)

Average for new private houses in 2023 is 70 p.m. (col B). In the first 7 months this year the average felt to 50 p.m – drop by 29%. Owner occupiers buy former rental houses and hence they’re building much less.

For units (mostly rentals) the fall of new private approvals is unprecedented. Last year avg was 270 p.m. (col C) First 7 months this year the avg = 148 p.m. – drop by 46%. It illustrates investor’s stampede for exit.

If you think the figures are not that bad I challenge you to find any two years in this table where the drop in house or unit approvals was milder than what we see in 2023/2024.

Incidental Tourist, it is misleading to say that “Owner occupiers buy former rental houses”. Yes but among far more houses bought from owner-occupiers and as new builds, where owner-occupiers account for three quarters of housing loans on average.

If you refer to ABS table 6432.0 Total Value of Dwellings, you will find that while ACT has clearly the second highest median house price after Sydney, significantly thanks to our range-topping median incomes, our apartment prices are third highest and on par with three other States (after Sydney). Further, price rises in the ACT have been among the lowest in the country in the past year, well below wage growth. In this context, why would you expect high development lodgements? Averages exist among fluctuations, and those are influenced by short term markets as well as planning.

Finally, if private investors, who create a minority of dwellings, are stampeding for the exit and releasing properties, who actually cares? Competent and well-capitalised investors, not to mention owner-occupiers, are more likely to see opportunity. Again, the government does not owe investors a living.

Incidental Tourist,
where do you think I got my data from?

You’re attempting to extrapolate data from a few months of trend that provides no statistical significance, you can’t use such a timeframe in the way you are trying to.

Historically, new builds peak towards the end of the year and January, so picking 7 months leaves out a significant amount of seasonal factors.

Using your example, in the first 7 months of 2023, average new builds were 211. In 2024, the number has dropped to 198. Hardly the catastrophe you are claiming.

Houses first 7 months of 2023 62, 2024 50.

Units have actually gone up from the same period in 2023.

Guess what the total average new build amounts were from 2000-2010?

210.

Maybe come back if the trends continue and you might have a point to make, the data doesn’t currently support your claims.

Incidental Tourist11:51 am 12 Sep 24

As I said above the main issue is the sharp drop in new housing supply. Perhaps now is a good time to snatch a bargain but property prices won’t stay subdued for long. There is no tenant without landlord. If the government wants landlords out then it will owe living to tenants who can’t find their landlord. And every local taxpayer will owe much more through all sort of old and new, explicit and hidden taxes – be it when you go to a shop, drive a car, see your GP, go to Canberra connect, rent or buy a dwelling.

Capital Retro12:44 pm 12 Sep 24

Then there is the matter of land tax on the rented units.
This is something the Canberra Liberals could investigate.

All of which is attempted cover for your absurd, rent-seeking post of 10.00 am 11 Sep 24 below, in a context where ACT has the highest vacancy rates in the country.

Incidental Tourist10:00 am 11 Sep 24

Investors are increasingly selling off because of rent control, exorbitant land tax and removal of no ground lease terminations. Every property sold by investor is a property not built. Calling on Sydneysiders is more a sign of desperation highlighting the problem.
Unfortunately ACT Labor had no balanced tenancy policy of their own borrowing populist headlines from ACT Greens. ACT Labor should draw the line between their and Green’s housing policies and move away from left. To increase housing supply ACT Labor should commit to restoring no fault lease terminations and permit setting rents at the market value. If Barr makes these election commitments then it will boost both Labor election chances and also restore investor’s confidence in ACT. In the end Greens will have no choice but to support Labor and they will.

devils_advocate10:37 am 11 Sep 24

Good summary, the only thing I would add is that investors are no longer in control of whether tenants keep pets, much less the type of pets; and while the tenant cannot terminate a lease – even after the term of the lease has expired – without specific reasons, the tenant can effectively terminate at will.

In addition the energy efficiency requirements which for some reason apply only in favour of tenants and require costly upgrades – together with the broader regulatory uncertainty around issues such as rent freezes which are commonly suggested by the Greens – all of these prompt investors to either leave the market or raise rents to cover their contingent liabilities (which they can do with impunity due to supply issues)

At the moment the “buy and hold” investor model doesn’t add up which is unfortunate because investors often provide the critical mass for new developments to go ahead.

“ He pointed to a number of ACT Government policies that were introduced in the second half of last year” but the article fails to mention them.

devils_advocate8:29 am 12 Sep 24

Too many to list at this stage.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.