Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

We'll switch your business
to Led lighting for Free*

High Court slaps down ACT Court of Appeal

By johnboy - 22 March 2007 19

It’s a grim day for the judges of the ACT Court of Appeal.

The High Court has pushed out a media release slamming the decision to set aside Steven Hillier’s conviction for the murder of Ana Louise Hardwick.

By a 4-1 majority, the Court remitted the matter to the Court of Appeal for rehearing. One member of the High Court would have ordered a retrial. The Court held that the majority in the Court of Appeal had identified facts which, examined in isolation from other evidence, were treated as requiring the conclusion that it was not open to the jury to be satisfied of his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The High Court held that the Court of Appeal failed to consider whether, on the whole of the evidence, all of it circumstantial, it was open to the jury to be persuaded beyond reasonable doubt that Mr Hillier was guilty. Neither at trial, nor on appeal, was a circumstantial case to be considered in piecemeal fashion. The conclusion that a guilty verdict was not open to the jury could only be reached if some aspects of the evidence were assessed separately from the rest. The Court held that the reasoning of the Court of Appeal majority was erroneous.

It will be interesting to see what the Appeals Court does when they take a second swing at the matter.

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
19 Responses to
High Court slaps down ACT Court of Appeal
DJ 12:03 pm 24 Mar 07

Very Good, how about doing yourself a favor and educating your opinion so you can actually back yourself up? Go into the Magistrates Court on Monday morning and listen to the matters going before the Magistrates. Listen to the seemingly endless petty breaches of bail that the offenders simply can’t abide by or the warrants for failing to appear…. big hint here is that the warrants for failing to appear are because the offender/s are busy breaking into you car or house instead of going to Court. They are out in the community because the Courts didn’t give them anything more than a slap on the wrist the last time they failed to abide by society’s rules.

To have a go at VG in a very petty manner like that wont cause him to spit the dummy and go hang himself. Matters don’t proceed to Court if there isn’t substance to them. Not all Magistrates are lacking like Higgins and some others I wont name but keep in mind that Higgins has a track record for poor performance. Perhaps Stanhope will get rid of him?

Very Good 11:08 am 24 Mar 07

Just the obligatory rider as well – preceeding statements were personal, not professional opinions.

simbo 10:30 am 24 Mar 07

Just wondering why, if VG thinks the judiciary in this town are a pack of incompetents, he thinks being praised in glowing terms by them is a good thing?

Very Good 10:11 am 24 Mar 07

Maybe there are more people involved in law enforcement in this town than just vg. Maybe they get tired of the incompetence of coppers as well. vg might well be supercop who gets praise for his performance – there are many others who aren’t.

vg 8:05 pm 23 Mar 07

I think its just his amateur attempts at getting a rise out of me. Big Al tried, failed and ran away. Maybe Very Good, who also borrowed my initials, is of the same spineless ilk.

People like them always bag me out at work. I always win in the end. What goes around, comes around

vandam 6:21 pm 23 Mar 07

very good, why do you constantly bag out coppers?

Sounds like you have nothing better to do. Maybe you just get off on telling coppers they suck.

Well try putting up with disease invested druggies everyday that spit at you and carry uncapped needles on them. Think about pulling down dead bodies hanging in a garage, or pulling dead children from car wrecks. Then of course there is putting up with people like you that just whinge and whine all the time.

But see Canberra is so full of middle class idiots that forget people of low class exist. This is the what Police deal with day in day out. But see I bet your one of these middle class people that choose to ignore this breed. I at least appreciate the job vg does. I certainly wouldn’t do it.

It’s not the Police that are failing, its the Government and judicial system.

Oh and on the Hillier case, what a great call Crispin and Higgins made at the appeal!!!!!
They are a pair of idiots. I think that is made clear by the stuff up with their decision.

vg 10:47 pm 22 Mar 07

and if you are going to quote me please do it properly

vg 10:47 pm 22 Mar 07

Yeah thats it, got it in one. My competence has never been questioned by the Courts, and has, to the contrary, been spoken of in quite glowing terms on numerous occasions.

In this case the highest Court in the land decided the ACT Court got it wrong, not me sweetie. But then again you’d have to have more than basic comprehension skills to nut that one out…maybe I expect too much from you, I apologise.

I’m also guessing you have nigh on nil Court experience to speak of, against the mountain that I possess but I’ll bear all that in mine next time a magistrate or judge in this town (and in other jurisdictions I might add) complements me on the professionalism and quality of my investigations.

Very Good 8:34 pm 22 Mar 07

‘No Justice in this town’…

Sounds like a whine from a copper who has the sads because their incompetence was regularly called out by the Courts to me. It’s much easier to pay out on the Judiciary for reaching what is considered a ‘wrong’ verdict than the coppers who are meant to be investigating competently.

vg 8:21 pm 22 Mar 07

I’m hoping they won’t be so reticent after this.

simbo 7:02 pm 22 Mar 07

It does say something about the DPP in this town, though, that they haven’t escalated more cases outside the hands of the local incompetents before now…

vg 6:41 pm 22 Mar 07

Another slap in the face for the judicial system in this town. When oh when will they align themselves with reality.

The finding is quite damning. There is no justice in the ACT. Maybe this will change things

Heavs 5:08 pm 22 Mar 07

Good. Right decision by the High Court.

johnboy 1:53 pm 22 Mar 07

The appeals court is going to re-hear the appeal, as opposed to the trial being conducted again.

seepi 1:46 pm 22 Mar 07

What is the difference between Retrying a case and Rehearing it? Anyone know?

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site