11 July 2024

Look at what the ACT passed over for a prime city site. Now it's vying for a world architecture prize

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
97
render of proposed development

Buildings like small hills: the Marion Park proposal for Block 1 Section 121 City opposite the QT Hotel. Images: Contreras Earl Architecture.

This stunning mixed-use development proposal failed to make the cut in Canberra but is now shortlisted for the prestigious World Architecture Festival in Singapore later this year.

In a case of what might have been for the almost two-hectare site (Block 1 Section 121 City) opposite the QT Hotel, the Marion Park masterplan proposal from Contreras Earl Architecture, in collaboration with Arup, Canberra’s Willemsen Group and Urbis, was submitted last year as part of a two-stage expression of interest process run by the City Renewal Authority.

Willemson Group has only just learnt that the proposal was unsuccessful.

The CRA said the outcome for the site on London Circuit and the future light rail line was still undecided, but it will be interesting to see what proposal is finally selected and compare it with the Contreras Earl design, which is a finalist in the Future Projects – Commercial Mixed-Use category in Singapore. Winners will be announced from 6 to 8 November.

READ ALSO The Look In with Glen Dowes: An award-winning custom townhouse

The master plan features topography-led architecture with five buildings rising organically from the earth, containing 456 residential units.

Horizontal terraces with lush vegetation connect the buildings, while pathways and green spaces form a lively natural park.

Curved landscaped balconies soften building edges and gently emulate the rolling hills of the region.

The complex would have also delivered hospitality, commercial and retail sections, as well as a community centre, promoting interaction among visitors, workers and residents.

The design maximises sunlight to create a vibrant public realm where people could have sat and lingered outdoors, fostering wellbeing and connection with nature.

It works with the site’s topography, using the natural 10-metre fall from one end to the other to create terraces and platforms engaging different communal areas.

The master plan aimed to set a benchmark for sustainability, pursuing a Net Zero operation with all-electric systems powered by 100 per cent renewable energy.

The design includes an “urban sponge” for stormwater management, green roofs, and landscaping to enhance biodiversity.

Passive design principles reduce heating and cooling demands, with almost all units benefiting from cross-ventilation, while green infrastructure mitigates the urban heat island effect.

Smart occupant sensing controls and sustainable materials also contribute to high-performance buildings, aligning with Canberra’s vision for a resilient urban future.

Contreras Earl Architecture director Rafael Contreras said the vision for Marion Park was to honour the natural beauty of Ngunnawal Country and respect the progressive design principles established by architects Walter Burley Griffin and Marion Mahony Griffin.

While the project will not be built on this site in Canberra, Mr Contreras still hopes it can find a home somewhere in the national capital.

“We are thrilled to see the Marion Park masterplan recognised internationally,” Mr Contreras says.

“This project holds a special place for us, and we hope it can serve as a model for future sustainable urban development.”

Mr Contreras said the firm did not receive any feedback on why the proposal was unsuccessful.

“We never saw this as a waste of time,” he said. “There are lots of things we learned from this project, and we are encouraged to continue to have one of these, hopefully, in Canberra in the near future.”

Mr Contreras said the firm wanted to create a project that was completely integrated with the natural context of Canberra.

The buildings were conceived as small hills to create a very livable and interesting space.

“We wanted people to perceive the buildings as part of the natural landscape.”

He said that while other bids may have maximised their yields – and the brief even suggested up to seven buildings could developed on the site – the firm wanted a balanced project that would not be too big and dense and allowed for a large public space.

Willemsen Group CEO Anthony Willemsen said the company wanted to produce a proposal that would reflect world’s best practices in sustainability and livability.

Sustainable buildings leader at Arup Richard Vincent said his team pushed the boundaries, “exceeding the requirements to create a project that not only meets but surpasses the highest standards of environmental responsibility”.

Director of Urbis Matthew Franzmann said: “Every corner of the site design aims to engage and inspire, serving as platforms for community engagement and a defined sense of place.”

READ ALSO Off-grid paradise with luxury eco-cabins overlooking Lake Jindabyne and the Snowy Mountains

A CRA spokesperson said the sales process for the site, currently being used to support the project to raise London Circuit, was ongoing.

“The two-stage sales process allows the Authority to assess design proposals for the site to ensure that the future development reflects the significance of this location as a southern gateway to the City Centre,” the spokesperson said.

“The Territory has shortlisted purchasers based on qualification criteria, capability and financial capacity. Purchasers may be interviewed by the Territory, as appropriate, to aid the selection of the preferred purchaser.”

* WAF represents the world’s largest live-judged architectural awards program, where finalists present their projects to a panel of judges at the international festival.

Join the conversation

97
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
ChrisinTurner6:27 pm 12 Jul 24

Smells like the Campbell Primary selection process.

People are kidding themselves if they think the AI assisted design drawings will look anything like the finished build. Please release a version not hidden under a jungle of sub-tropical plants.

It should win a graphics design competition not a construction competition.

Not a fan if I’m honest, this looks like an all inclusive hotel resort or shopping centre, and a lot of work to maintain, no owner wants their levies so astronomical that it’s not worth the investment so then the city is stuck with an expensive slum.

Andrew Savoulidis11:06 pm 13 Jul 24

Yes. Confined as you would say.

Another poor planning decision from the mob who decided to wreck City Hill with the over bearing Law Courts building nudging the roadway….that was an ill conceived obnoxious contribution to the City Scape.

How did this get turned in and why it looks like the type of design we should be calling for not stopping going ahead, what ever they build would want to be pretty damn good.

Incidental Tourist6:05 pm 10 Jul 24

Looks like beautiful utopia town built for those rich who can afford it.

Andrew Savoulidis4:33 pm 10 Jul 24

I don’t think a Ex-Peruvian Citizen can make an assumption that a design of his is best in a well held (after many years) part of a supplementary part of the city.

Obviously will be released to a new developer who will be able to compensate the government somewhat.

Meanwhile, how about leaving Gungahlin and the City especially so, alone.

Belconnen more so then Tuggeranong to awaken people attitudes down South.

Westfields are cramming in customers. Then spending it everywhere else but Canberra. The worst Westfields around. Nothing changed for 40 years….

Andrew

George Frazis10:25 am 11 Jul 24

Mr. Savoulidis,

It’s disappointing to read your comment. The ability to design great architecture in Australia isn’t limited to Australian citizens. Do you know who designed the Opera House? was it an australian citizen? maybe you have no idea about it, so I encourage you to do more research and broaden your understanding. 

Also, you should read about the Griffin architects (the ones who designed Canberra city). Interestingly, they were not Australian citizens either.

Andrew Savoulidis11:20 pm 13 Jul 24

Mr Frazis.

I am actually an original Canberra born and current dual business operator in North Canberra and Belconnen.

Outside of the city there is not much, but generally a conventional type of highrise in either town centre of Belconnen or Woden accomodated by ordinary shopping centres. The City Centre on the hand, for Canberra’s population could be easily overdone.

This fella Contraeras, would not know it, as he has submitted his work, with very little understanding of this city we live in and have lived in for decades

Canberra has so many angles, sights, architecturally designed buildings and mountains as a backdrop over a spectacularly built lake stretching east-west.

Would you think it needs such a monolith on top of all this greatness???

Nick Stevens8:05 am 10 Jul 24

Putting aside the flowery descriptor waffle (surely a gold medal effort), what we have is five blocks of flats, oops sorry…apartments, devoid of how big those apartments are.
Nonetheless the lush greenery is easily sustainable in Canberra’s sub tropical climate.

HiddenDragon8:56 pm 09 Jul 24

The Hanging Gardens of Babylon vibe might have been a bit too close to the bone, or maybe some mastermind has decided that this block would be just the place for a carefully worded (i.e. lots of wriggle room) announcement, just before the ACT election, about a stadium and related developments which will never, of course, happen, but will suck in enough credulous voters with blather about “building world class facilities for a growing city”.

Tom McLuckie5:51 pm 09 Jul 24

Not in Canberra. Doesn’t fit the Greens / Labor stalinisitic approach they have adopted in Gunners, Belco or Weston. Thou shalt live in a sparse concrete jungle and be happy with it. Thou should only ever work in Civic or the line of the tram. Thou should never use a car and polite the atmosphere whilst we fly all around the world on your behalf.

I suppose the developer wasn’t generous enough with their donations to the parties.

Gregg Heldon4:17 pm 09 Jul 24

Prefer a high rise development that looks like that to a Geocon ghetto.

Andrew Savoulidis5:16 pm 10 Jul 24

Exactly

Finance 6'5" Blue Eyes4:11 pm 09 Jul 24

Whatever, this is Canberra; we only want dodgy Geocon buildings!!

Well, that will teach them to grease the right palms in future.

So all the feedback that you should basically leave it alone has been ignored! Figures…

It looks very pretty. No doubt all the apartments are 8+ star energy rating and start at $1million plus. Perfect for the typical inner city champagne socialist, greenie.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.