11 January 2024

Escooters versus the light rail - guess which one is making the bigger impact

| Zoya Patel
Join the conversation
76
A woman and a man ride e-scooters.

Scooters are adding choice to Canberra’s transport options. (Pictured: the last scooter riders seen wearing helmets in the ACT.) Photo: Supplied.

You won’t catch me riding an escooter any time soon – not because I am against them per se (though I have had my issues with some users), but because I have zero balance and they scare me. But after my initial disgruntled reaction when the bright orange and purple scooters first arrived in Canberra, I have since come to see them as a blessing to the city.

My issue with them was safety-related. Those early days, having people whoosh past without warning and ride in the bike lanes on Northbourne Avenue did my head in. Now, years after their introduction, I’m pleased to see how consistently Canberrans are using the environmentally friendly scooters as a transport option between public transport spots or around their local area.

And now, the data shows the impact they’re having.

READ ALSO Aussie parents are getting older – and that’s probably a good thing

Region reported in November on data from the 2022 Australian Cycling and E-Scooter Economy Report that 31 per cent of the ACT adult population had used an escooter in 2022 and the daily average number of escooter trips in Canberra is 3000.

Meanwhile, the ACT Government also released light rail usage data, boasting that Gungahlin residents are now twice as likely to use public transport as they were when surveyed in 2017. What about the rest of Canberra? Well, public transport usage has dropped by 22 per cent for the entire ACT. This isn’t surprising given the bus timetable has been cut twice since 2019 when light rail launched, and the light rail only services one specific part of the community.

When you look at the total cost of the light rail to date versus the usage data and the impact across the ACT community, it’s hard to fully see the rationale for prioritising it over expenditure on broader public transport solutions that will reach more ACT residents in a shorter timeframe.

I look forward to riding the light rail to Woden in 2028, but in the meantime, I’d like to be able to catch public transport from Watson to Manuka without needing to take two buses, the light rail, walk a kilometre and ultimately spend over an hour travelling what is otherwise a 20-minute drive.

The hardest thing when talking about public transport in Canberra is that any criticism of light rail is seen as being opposed to environmentally friendly transport options. Supporting light rail has become synonymous with being pro-action to combat climate change, and any criticism is seen as wanting to retain the status quo. But this is a false narrative, one that ignores that there are other ways to address carbon emissions and increase public transport usage that don’t have to rely on a fixed rail system that will struggle to fully service a city like Canberra that is decentralised and covers half the land area as London with a much smaller budget to service our modest population.

When I look at the escooter data and the fact that the scheme is cost-neutral for the government, I can see an obvious benefit to both the community and the environment. Light rail is yet to convince me, and it’s likely going to be another decade before the full benefits start to be realised across the city. In the meantime, public transport spending continues to focus on its development, and bus timetables keep frustrating Canberrans who want to leave their car in the garage (or don’t have a car!)

It might be time for me to hop on the escooters, like so many other Canberrans. They might not be a long-distance solution, but they’re definitely making a positive impact on our city.

Join the conversation

76
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Where there are no footpaths, pedestrians have worn tracks for walking. Since the growth of e-scooters these walking tracks become unable to be walked on after rain. As the tracks get muddy, a deep trench is created by the wheels of the scooters and bikes destroying the formerly flat ground on which people could walk. A caring government would put in footpaths to prevent falls by pedestrians, but sadly there’s no sign of this happening despite them being alerted to the issues and the risks repeatedly. They just don’t care.

eGaz “eGaz” TheFirstAustralian2:58 pm 15 Jan 24

To be fair, e-scooters should not be cost neutral. Kilometers of footpaths require maintenance and extra attention to make them safe. Canberra seriously needs zebra crossings where there should be and the segway between footpath and roads required serious attention. Scrap the light rail heavy tracks and make the trams trackless. Save millions on one hand and spend on the other. At least we’d be making more of the community happy instead of the few.

GrumpyGrandpa5:21 pm 12 Jan 24

This article praises the glory of scooters and yet Riotact has also published an article regarding the OCN’s concerns of fire risk within apartments common areas caused by scooters.

Sure, there are the commercial grade orange and purple scooters that we see litered around our roads and parks and the scooters of lower standard.

Needless to say, the average mum, dad or individual probably won’t be buying a commercial grade scooter.
Thinking that scooters are environmentally sound, they’ll go out and buy the fire risk variety.

https://ocn.org.au/ocn-in-the-media/

Capital Retro3:59 pm 12 Jan 24

D.c.Haas, Duncan Edgehill from Canberra Metro about 10 years ago that said the Canberra Light Rail was about urban renewal, not public transport.

You can have one but not both.

You advocate for trams and scooters, but what form of transport will you be using after you’ve had your baby?

Light rail is easier to get a stroller on and off than a car.

Capital Retro5:36 pm 12 Jan 24

Why would you want to put a car on a tram?

If you have little kids you can easily wheel their stroller on and off a light rail. If using a car you need to remove child from stroller, fold up stroller, place child in car seat restraint, then put the folded stroller somewhere in storage in the car. Then repeat the whole exercise at your destination. Light rail is much easier. Additionally I’ve been told by a physiotherapist that getting a small child in and out of a car (repeatedly) causes back problems later on.

Capital Retro
You will need to explain your reasoning, as unlike some I use public transport and it’s not uncommon for prams to come aboard. I imagine it would be even easier with a tram to take prams aboard.

Capital Retro8:20 am 16 Jan 24

I was referring to astro2 saying it is easier to put a stroller on a tram than putting a car on a tram.

ChrisinTurner1:43 pm 12 Jan 24

If we had electric buses instead of electric trams we could afford to remove all fares. That would get people back onto public transport.

Do you know how much an electric bus costs? Hint, they’re not cheap. I’ve got a better idea – pay no tax. Never going to happen

HiddenDragon7:42 pm 11 Jan 24

“The hardest thing when talking about public transport in Canberra is that any criticism of light rail is seen as being opposed to environmentally friendly transport options. “

That is surely a large part of the support for, or at least resignation to, light rail but it goes beyond that.

I know people who have a (non-EV) car for every member of the household who is old enough, would not dream of walking the couple of hundred metres to the local shops, and do not otherwise have lifestyles which would earn the Green seal of approval, but who nonetheless speak fondly of “the tram” – even though it will never come remotely close to where they live or otherwise serve their needs.

The best I can work out is that some think it’s a good idea because it might help to get other people off the roads, thus reducing congestion for them, while others see it as a symbol of a small town “growing up”.

Beyond that, it seems to be a reflection of the lip service progressivism (so often of the “do as I say, not as I do” variety) which is almost like a state religion in this town, along with a Magic Pudding mentality which assumes that the money to pay for political promises that sound like a nice idea will magically materialise, without the need for even higher rates and taxes or cuts to other spending. If the ACT Liberals are to get anywhere with their commitment to cancel Stage 2B, they will need to confront this mentality with some unpalatable home truths about the ACT’s fiscal challenges.

Excellent piece. Yes, hard to have a sensible discussion over important issues, but this is how it will be started

Neither e-scooters nor the tram enable people to get around our city at night, so what’s the point of later opening hours for venues if neither patrons nor staff can get safely home afterwards.

Trams don’t go where they’re needed. E-scooters, e-bikes, cars or even normal bikes & scooters are not safe transport home for those who’ve been drinking or indulging in other mind-bending activities, whilst taxis and Ubers cannot always meet the demand in a timely and cost-effective way.

Does this ACT government really want a better nightlife here? If so, fix the night-time and weekend transport situation.

Currently, it’s very difficult to get from east to west, whilst north south is a broken trip with different modes of transport. Imagine if we had a night-time inner city bus route that took people through all the entertainment areas including kingston, manuka, barton, yarralumla, deakin, civic and perhaps braddon & dickson, enabling people to jump on and off as they made the most of places to go in our city. No need to drink and drive, but safe transport to and from each location. Even better if there was a stop at a central location from which there was safe transport to outer locations.

Another light rail election. Can we please have it as a separate line item on the voting papers please.

I think it would be good to get Chris Steel to explain why LR is the best but that which we’ll pay for like Hire Purchase through to the next generation. Electric buses can use what exists and costs the same as the combined contracts for Stage 2A-$.900m and yes I am prepared to justify. Trackless trams are a known and tested alternative as is BRT like was rolled out in Brisbane. They too could be rolled out quicktime getting rid of 451 polluting buses. BUT-they are in charge of the cookie barrel. You need to stop 2A in its tracks or pay the price long term. No IFS, BUTS or maybes! A fancier mode doesn’t cure patronage-direct, car-like travel times do.

However, this government wants 19th century technology, unlike this:
https://theconversation.com/why-trackless-trams-are-ready-to-replace-light-rail-103690

@Futureproof
Credit where it’s due, Fp … nice one – the best of both worlds. Getting over Lake BG = tick.

PS Why did you shoot yoursef in the foot with your “Do you know how much an electric bus costs? Hint, they’re not cheap.” comment above.

JS, did you read this comment: “If we had electric buses instead of electric trams we could afford to remove all fares” As I said, they’re not cheap. Got to pay for them somehow, and that would have to be people who use them

The claim that Gungahlin residents are twice as likely to use public transport since Light Rail, to no one’s surprise, comes from a Survey, as the claim is not matched by ABS Census data or Canberra Transport ridership data for Gungahlin.

Is this yet another case where Canberra Transport uses some ‘leading’ questions to drive the answer they seek or did they just undertake the survey at a Light Rail platform?

It’s like asking visitors to the Tesla storefront ‘do you prefer EV’s or petrol cars’?

But of course! That is how the ACT government operates. It claims to consult, but restricts options for answers to squeeze people into responding to support their agenda, rather than seeking genuine consultation and information to better design services to the needs of the community.

Also given that the LR/Tram is the only option between Gungahlin town centre and Civic (and they removed the direct buses) then of course they will see an increase in usage as the population continues to grow

Leon Arundell9:27 am 11 Jan 24

Privately-owned e-scooters provide low emissions travel, but renting an e-scooter can cause more emissions than travelling by car: https://www.wired.com/story/e-scooter-rentals-carbon-emissions/

Steven Green1:26 pm 11 Jan 24

100% of the ACT’S electricity demand is sourced from renewables, so renting an escooter is just as low impact as riding a private one.

Matthew Scott1:58 pm 11 Jan 24

That’s not actually true. The ACT gets it’s electricity from the NSW grid which is mostly from conventional power generation. The 100% renewable claim is due to the ACT building wind and solar farms around the country to offset it’s fossil fuel powered electricity consumption.

Saw a young fellow thrown face-first onto the pavement when he *slowly* rode across the zebra stripes on a slip lane. The tiny front wheel of the escooter had caught on the lip of the road gutter. So let’s check the hospital stats — there might be drawbacks, maybe not the unalloyed golden road to Zoya’s chattering-class eco utopia.

Zoya is mistaken when she says “ I look forward to riding the light rail to Woden in 2028” it’s only getting to commonwealth park by 2028. At best it’s hard to see light rail getting to Woden before 2035.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.