4 September 2024

550-seat function centre and hotel at Gold Creek knocked back on heritage grounds

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
13
render of development

An artist’s impression of the proposed functions building looking from O’Hanlon Place. Images: Judd Studio.

A 550-seat function centre and hotel proposed for historic Gold Creek in Gungahlin has been knocked back on heritage grounds, among other issues raised by the ACT Planning Authority.

The $13 million project was proposed by Canberra Business and Technology College CEO Rakesh Bhutani to meet the demand for a sizable venue for big community celebrations.

The plans for the two-storey centre, developed by Judd Studio architects and town planners SPACELAB Studio, included an in-house kitchen, a connected 60-room wing to provide guest accommodation, an underground car park and landscaping.

READ ALSO Ever wondered what one of Canberra’s oldest houses is like inside? Ruth is opening hers this spring

The current shops and small tenancies would make way and additions stripped back to reveal the heritage-listed former Roman Catholic church.

The plans show the church and a proposed pavilion with bench seating and two reflection pools separated from the main functions building.

The DA said the work would allow the church building to be seen and celebrated again.

However, the Notice of Decision said the proposal was not supported by the ACT Heritage Council, even after an amendment that sought to resolve issues was lodged.

The council said that as is, the proposal would diminish the heritage significance of the Ginninderra Village Precinct, listing the extent of proposed demolition, the amount of surface parking, and a lack of sufficient soft landscaping.

It said demolition of the original significant fabric could be minimised and still achieve a functional space, and a better landscape setting was needed for the former church building.

Surface parking and the related driveway to the south and west of the church building also needed to be reduced.

redner of proposed development

The heritage-listed church and the proposed pavilion.

The Notice of Decision also identified a parking shortfall of 77 spaces, and heritage requirements would exacerbate this. The proposal also relied on spaces on nearby properties.

It said the proposal did not comply with a minimum 6-metre setback from all boundaries, including being only 1.2 metres from O’Hanlon Place at the front.

The proposed removal of regulated trees also counted against the proposal.

“The proposal is not considered to be compatible with the environmental values for the locality, particularly the proposed tree removals and extent of landscaping having regard to the heritage significance of the Ginninderra Village Precinct,” the Notice of Decision said.

The amendment included retaining two verge trees on O’Hanlon Place, revising surface car parking and extending the basement car park, increasing the front setback, reducing the building height and cutting the hotel rooms to 57.

READ ALSO Canberra’s best real estate agents turn on the glitz for annual awards night

Mr Bhutani told Region last November that there was no venue in Canberra at present that could cater for big events.

As an example, he said an Indian wedding would have a minimum of 500 guests, but organisers were having to select a venue and then limit the number of people that could be invited.

“I’ve been living in Canberra for 12 years, and in that time, I haven’t seen any community centre come up to assist us – the Indian community or any community,” Mr Bhutani said.

“There are not enough places for celebrations here for any community.”

Mr Bhutani said that a Reconsideration application dealing with the issues raised would be lodged.

Representations included the proposal being inconsistent with the tourist precinct purpose of Ginninderra Village and cited heritage values, traffic and parking, density and scale and pedestrian safety.

Join the conversation

13
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I don’t know why any developer bothers submitting a development proposal to Labor/Greens Governments. So jobs that would have been created during the building stage are lost and the community misses out on a much-needed facility for ideological reasons.

stephen golding5:35 pm 13 Sep 24

Yeah, six small businesses have closed, which is suppose an excellent win for the much-needed ugly Indian facility. What about Pialligo Estate? It’s an extensive wedding facility.
If you want to destroy history and environment, jobs as an excuse

stephen golding5:38 pm 13 Sep 24

Much needed greed more likely Go use Pialligo Estate

Ahahahahahaha sigh. So an entire suburb full of houses over 100 years old (some built 1880s) gets refused heritage protection (Oaks Estate), but somehow Gold Creek is precious.

Annette Hudson8:28 pm 13 Sep 24

That would be because of the socio economic group residing , Canberra to doesn’t care about heritage it’s all about how much money is in the area.,.,

Not much ‘heritage’ here. Chalk up another development stopped by anti development, anti business, anti employment creation, woke , Canberra ‘planners’

stephen golding5:43 pm 13 Sep 24

Let’s concrete as much of Canberra as possible to benefit those community-minded developers and builders. They always have the community good at heart.
Talking anti business this development has already caused small business to close.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.