13 January 2025

Did Peter Dutton just call an election?

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
18
Peter Dutton

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has ‘unofficially’ launched his election campaign. Photo: Peter Dutton Facebook.

Peter Dutton has returned from his summer break to reinforce what Australians are all too aware of – they’re headed for an election soon.

With a date yet to be set and the campaign not even properly begun, the Opposition Leader has matched the Prime Minister’s new-year electioneering with a major speech that has all the characteristics of a campaign launch.

To Coalition party faithful gathered in Melbourne on Sunday (12 January), Mr Dutton unveiled a campaign slogan and pitched his case to be elected PM.

“This year, Australians will have an opportunity to elect a new and strong Coalition government to get our country back on track,” he said.

“There’s a saying, ‘oppositions don’t win elections, governments lose them’. Yes, governments lose elections, but oppositions can – and do – win elections. Provided people know what they stand for. Provided people understand their plan and vision to better the country.

“And provided people recognise the values, experience and character of the alternative Prime Minister.

“I want no Australian to be left wondering what the Coalition stands for.”

But while the Opposition Leader’s address was full of criticism for the current Labor government and in particular Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, it offered no new policy positions.

Mr Dutton merely repeated his aim to “get Australia back on track”.

In fact, he launched a campaign slogan that says exactly that, along with an election booklet with the same name: Let’s Get Australia Back On Track: The priorities of a Dutton Coalition Government.

He delivered a publicised 38-minute speech to an audience of MPs and Liberal/National party faithful, which aimed to remind Australians of his background and achievements during the numerous portfolios he held when the Coalition was in office.

In what he coined a “sliding doors moment” for Australia, Mr Dutton presented his case for making Labor a one-term government.

And there was no shortage of political rhetoric.

“I admire Australians. We’re a remarkable people – compassionate, stoic, fair and quietly patriotic,” he said. “But under this Albanese Labor government, I’ve seen the mood of Australians change.

“Australians have endured one of the most incompetent governments in our nation’s history.

“They’ve suffered under one of our country’s weakest ever prime ministers.

“The last three years have been a litany of bad decisions and broken promises. As a result, Australians are worse off. Our country is less safe. Our society is less cohesive.

“For so many Australians, aspiration has been replaced by anxiety, optimism has turned to pessimism, and national confidence changed to dispiritedness.

“Mr Albanese says this election is about the future versus the past. I think the past three years are a good indication of what the future will look like under a returned Labor government.

“That’s a future Australians can’t afford.

“Especially if the green-Teals or extreme-Greens hold the balance of power.

“During my time in Parliament, here’s a key thing I’ve observed: When a government gets its priorities wrong, things go wrong for the Australian people. The Albanese government has had the wrong priorities.

“It’s prioritised the agendas of inner-city Greens voters, activists, and union bosses.

“It’s disregarded everyday Australian workers, families and small businesses – from city suburbs to regional towns to coastal communities.”

READ ALSO Election hint that tells us nothing we didn’t already know

Meanwhile, the Prime Minister is gathering his senior ministers together today (13 January) for the cabinet meeting of his government for 2025.

Hot off his weeklong blitz of three states last week announcing big-ticket infrastructure commitments, it is expected that cost-of-living relief will be the focus of today’s meeting.

The PM, who is keeping his preferred election date a secret, said his government was united and ready for the campaign, despite polling showing Labor to be in trouble.

“We’ll be seeking a majority government at the next election and Australians will have a choice between a government that has provided cost-of-living relief, that has built the foundations of future growth for a future made in Australia, and an Opposition that hasn’t put forward an alternative plan, that’s just said ‘no’ to all of our cost-of-living measures and that doesn’t have a plan for Australia’s future, that will take Australia backwards,” Mr Albanese said last week.

“So, I’ll be putting forward my optimistic vision for this nation. I think if we get this decade right, we can set Australia up for the many decades ahead …

“I’ve been in the parliament for a while now. I have never seen a political party as united, as cohesive and as determined as the Australian Labor Party is going into 2025.”

Join the conversation

18
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Soooo…should I start making GABOT hats, and should I make them red or would that be too bleedin obvious?

John Pedestrian2:08 pm 13 Jan 25

Suggest that it’s clear that Labor is going for an early election. And Dutton is simply responding to that.
John Black ex Labor senator and numbers guy is predicting that the LNP plus a few conservative independents are most likely to be the next government – the senate will continue to be the usual chaos.

J a c k d a w1:29 pm 13 Jan 25

“Let’s Get Australia Back On Track : The priorities of a Dutton Coalition Government.”
NOPE – too Prolix !

The Saturday Paper’s latest editorial offers another perspective: “This is a taste of what is coming in the Election. Peter Dutton has offered more detail on his approach to Reconciliation than he has on almost any other policy area.”
Paralleling that, John Hewson (of Liberal cake-GST fame, remember ?) wistfully observes: “As the new year begins, we all hope for different things. For me, my wish is for an election campaign that is characterised by grace, decency and policy substance. It shouldn’t be such a big ask, but it’s hard to count on it happening.”

Dutton and Littleproud – naysayers both. Lest we forgot.

Why does no-one ever call Dutton on his claims Albanese leads “one of the most incompetent governments in our nation’s history”? His selective memory seems to forget the mess Albanese inherited from a government that Dutton was a senior minister in.

I’m not claim Albanese is perfect (there are a lot of things I am disappointed with) but the nation’s financial state is actually better than what it was when he took over.

Albo’s biggest stuff up was getting his son Chairman’s lounge access. That showed he isn’t one of the people.

He is though? The definitive Howard Aspirational: from humble beginnings, he now lives in a $4M coastal mansion – thus demonstrating that with enough grit and having a go, you can win.

Labor’s priorities seem to have been the voice, Palestine, high immigration and expensive and unreliable renewables. Australia needs to change direction and it’s not going to happen under the current government. Good on Dutton for outlining a vision for Australia.

And no, oppositions don’t call elections.

Hi Penfold, you may have forgotten a few priorities so here a memory-jogger for you:
$3bn in student debt relief; Help-to-Buy shared equity Scheme; Build-to-rent for 80,000 homes; Pay rise for childcare workers; aged care reforms; Future Made in Australia reforms; Social media laws to protect our children. As to your claim about expensive renewables, they’re a lot cheaper than any nuclear option.
As to Dutton, who a previous Liberal PM described as a “thug”, we don’t need that style of far right-wing politics in Australia, thx.

Capital Retro12:25 pm 13 Jan 25

You forgot to mention the resounding success the NDIS has been.

Astro2, the Coalition’s “renewables plus nuclear” plan is 44% cheaper than Labor’s “renewables only” plan.
https://www.australianeedsnuclear.org.au

J a c k d a w1:00 pm 13 Jan 25

Nobody believes that .. .. nobody

LOL,
Surely no one is actually taking the Liberal costings for nuclear seriously?

There’s so many holes in the “analysis”, you could drive a truck through them.

It’s not, completely garbage figures dependent on massive and unlikely assumptions…such as Australia…with no nuclear industry will build nuclear power plants faster than any country in history and the assumption that SMRs are a thing….but they’re not there are only two SMRs in commercial operation and both are massively subsidised by totalitarian governments (China & Russia). SMRs don’t generate enough power to cover the massive costs.

Dutton’s figures are garbage, his nuclear plan is aimed at the uniformed and culture warriors, even if he does get elected it won’t happen because the energy retailers and generators have already said no (because it’s too expensive and too slow).

Renewables are the cheapest form of power refer to the Gencost report. Dutton’s “vision” amounts to little more than culture wars based on telling massive porkies.

astro2 – Future made in Australia – ha! You have to have (cheap) power for manufacturing

Seano, CIS scrutiny of the 2024-25 GenCost report shows the CSIRO have massively underestimated the cost of battery storage for a renewables only plan, greatly underestimated the capacity factor of nuclear power generators, significantly underestimated the cost of transmission lines, underestimated the cost of energy wastage with renewables only, and overestimated the capacity factor for wind and solar. Plus, CSIRO will not show their math.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsJXtVdY7Cc

John Pedestrian3:03 pm 13 Jan 25

Chewy
The LNP proposal is on a close look probably a bit less expensive than the ALPs. But both plans are very expensive. And will have to be paid for one way or another.

Warming is real and the transition is not really avoidable – the two sides are only arguing about ‘how to do it’.
However
Either way power bills will continue to rise.

John Pedestrian, cheaper to build by building less, generating less power, a poorer country?
With the immediate consequence of higher electricity prices after you have funded the extravagance directly through your taxes?
Considered the increased emissions in the meantime, when you already say you recognise the warming problem?

Commercial entities are not interested for a good reason. Return on capital is not there without subsidy from you and I, and it seems you are more keen to waste money than I am.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.