Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Business

Buying or selling? Get the right advice

APS job cuts, what’s really going to happen

By pepmeup - 8 May 2013 92

Over the past election cycle I have heard just about everything about what is going to happen to the APS, after the inevitable election of an Abbott Federal Government. In recent days Tony has said he will move APS jobs to regional areas, Big Joe has been saying for months that the coalition will cut the APS. You here numbers like 20,000 jobs from Canberra, then 12,000 jobs nationally. You here that the ALP have already cut 5,000 jobs.

I don’t work in the APS but like most others in Canberra the business I work in does rely on a strong APS to survive. I know that retail is doing it really hard in Canberra, so I guess I want to know, what is confidence like in the APS at the moment? Are people worried about job loses? Why aren’t people spending?

In closing does anyone trust that Zed will look after us after September?

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
92 Responses to
APS job cuts, what’s really going to happen
EvanJames 12:26 pm 08 May 13

DrKoresh said :

I wouldn’t trust Zed to look after a pet rock, JS.

OK, that gets the Mars Bar for best comment.

thebrownstreak69 12:25 pm 08 May 13

johnboy said :

Big cuts mean some people leave town. So real estate gets a break. Homeowners need to sit tight for a few years.

But thousands of public servants with a big payout in their hands will chance their arm starting a new business.

And in a couple of years, if history is any guide, they’ll be back in their old jobs as contractors earning even more.

It’s a time of flux, but also some significant opportunity.

That’s a good summary.

EvanJames 12:22 pm 08 May 13

I’m watching the whole thing with interest. Abbott and Hockey learnt their trade from Howard. When Howard took over in 96, he came in behind many years of Hawke/Keating Labor government, so the APS was fairly plump. I can’t remember the eventual numbers but the figure of 20,000 is in my head, of federal public servants who lost their jobs as a direct result (this included many thousands from the CES, which had over 300 offices nationally, and all lost their jobs).

However, this time, Abbott gets the APS which has had cuts imposed via efficiency dividends every 6 months, since Rudd. Rather than cutting programs, they’ve been just removing money from departmental budgets and making them chip around the edges to trim expenditure. So it’s been on things like staffing, travel, stores, temporary staff and contractors, rather than strategic savings.

Anyone watching APS recruitment over the past 3-odd years will have seen the numbers of jobs shrinking, and many positions being contract-style.

So, with Abbott and Hockey spruiking all the blood they’re going to let, I’m wondering, when faced with the reality of a much thinner APS, and a much larger population than in 96, will they continue with their swingeing cuts? Or will they become strategic, using program cuts to achieve their aim?

As for Zed defending Canberra, you have GOT to be kidding. Like Humphries did? That turned out well.

OTOH, they could move a department out to Quangers, and staff it very easily.

johnboy 11:43 am 08 May 13

Not very many teachers employed by the APS.

Deref 11:41 am 08 May 13

zorro29 said :

retail rely on the APS? more like “have a captive audience so gouge away for poor quality”….

i would like to see a huge purge in the APS cos a large portion of people are useless and many jobs have no impact on anyone (or could be performed by fewer people)…and impacting the retail sector would be an added bonus cos you’ve had it way too good for way too long – the pricing for quality/service/range is outrageous (for everything). if you provided honest and good value output, i might feel bad for you…but, alas, you don’t.

i work in the APS and no one is particularly nervous about cuts…cos they know either way they get a massive payout…they’re more nervous about shifting portfolio responsibilities and the resulting machinery of government changes.

Please, please don’t sack the teachers.

Deref 11:40 am 08 May 13

“You here numbers like 20,000 jobs from Canberra…”

I hope that none of the job cuts involve teachers.

neanderthalsis 11:35 am 08 May 13

I seem to recall a Labor leader by the name of Kev pledging to take a meataxe to the public service in the not too distant past. Since then real numbers in many departments have fallen significantly because of the efficiency dividend, natural attrition, terrible workplace culture and poor management. The newly created agencies have held some of the numbers, but recent MoGing would have seen Climate Change whittled down to 3 hippies and an economist anyway.

The truth is that there is a LOT of dead wood and bloated job roles in most departments. I (from outside the APS) commonly deal with SES who have no strategic thought process or forethought, EL2s who have little policy knowledge and even less leadership ability, EL1s who perform very basic contract management roles that should really be done by a 4, basic administrative roles are performed by 5s and 4s because 1s and 2s are an endangered species.

So I say to Joe and Tony cut away. Create a lean, effective and productive public service that supports policy implementation and basic front-line services.

Rollersk8r 11:32 am 08 May 13

Relocating public servants is not a new idea and nothing to worry about, in my opinion. It’s a very popular and superficial line – used by both sides of politics – that public servants should be among the “real people” that need services. While some agencies are now primarily based in Melbourne or Sydney, the numbers simply don’t add up when it comes to relocating entire departments.

DrKoresh 11:31 am 08 May 13

I wouldn’t trust Zed to look after a pet rock, JS.

Dilandach 11:30 am 08 May 13

The figure that I’ve heard those close to the decision makers is for the ACT it’ll be 4% across the board cut of APS positions in the ACT for the first round with the insinuation that there is more after.

but yes, JC is correct. Its the merry-go-round of the APS and change of government that always happens. Team blue come in, say the APS was full of waste under team red, cut positions but then find they can’t handle the workload and then need to hire contractors which they pay higher rates for. Then to reduce costs those contractors are offered APS positions. Then team red come in and say the APS is full of waste under team blue… and around and around we go.

c_c™ 11:26 am 08 May 13

zorro29 said :

retail rely on the APS? more like “have a captive audience so gouge away for poor quality”….

i would like to see a huge purge in the APS cos a large portion of people are useless and many jobs have no impact on anyone (or could be performed by fewer people)…and impacting the retail sector would be an added bonus cos you’ve had it way too good for way too long – the pricing for quality/service/range is outrageous (for everything). if you provided honest and good value output, i might feel bad for you…but, alas, you don’t.

i work in the APS and no one is particularly nervous about cuts…cos they know either way they get a massive payout…they’re more nervous about shifting portfolio responsibilities and the resulting machinery of government changes.

Yeah, like anyone is going to take someone who can’t capitalise ‘I’ and uses the phrase ‘cos’ seriously. At least you prove there is some fat to be trimmed from the public service.

HiddenDragon 11:17 am 08 May 13

It may be that the Abbott Opposition is simply being more open about its intentions than was the “relaxed and comfortable” Howard Opposition in the lead up to the 1996 election, but I think there is somewhat more to it than that. I believe there is much more fervour and determination this time, and note that this Opposition frontbench, having been out of power for less than six years, has more people with experience as ministers, junior ministers, parl secs etc. who should thus have a somewhat better idea of where the bodies are buried, so to speak (and thus will be that much harder to snow).

Abbott has so far resisted the IPA forces on his parental leave scheme, but I would guess that he will take much more notice of dry arguments and ideas when it comes to public administration, particularly with less than rosy Budget forecasts for the coming years. It may not be possible to give effect to some of the more radical ideas floating around, but I think an Abbott government will, as the saying goes, not die wondering. I certainly don’t share the sanguine views of those who say that there will just be some trimming, and some shuffling between the public and private sectors, and that any real cuts will be restored over time. This time, I reckon, it really will be different – Canberrans are increasingly sensing that, and are adjusting their spending habits accordingly.

johnboy 11:11 am 08 May 13

Big cuts mean some people leave town. So real estate gets a break. Homeowners need to sit tight for a few years.

But thousands of public servants with a big payout in their hands will chance their arm starting a new business.

And in a couple of years, if history is any guide, they’ll be back in their old jobs as contractors earning even more.

It’s a time of flux, but also some significant opportunity.

zorro29 11:06 am 08 May 13

retail rely on the APS? more like “have a captive audience so gouge away for poor quality”….

i would like to see a huge purge in the APS cos a large portion of people are useless and many jobs have no impact on anyone (or could be performed by fewer people)…and impacting the retail sector would be an added bonus cos you’ve had it way too good for way too long – the pricing for quality/service/range is outrageous (for everything). if you provided honest and good value output, i might feel bad for you…but, alas, you don’t.

i work in the APS and no one is particularly nervous about cuts…cos they know either way they get a massive payout…they’re more nervous about shifting portfolio responsibilities and the resulting machinery of government changes.

JC 10:44 am 08 May 13

Mostly it is smoke and mirrors. They cut APS then next week employ contractors. It will be different if Abbott gets in with a big purge to show the country he means business but by the end of the first term it will be back to normal. Of course the purge will effect Canberra the most

One point of order what Abbott has being saying this week is not moving jobs to the regions but creating new jobs for the disability insurance scheme outside of Canberra. Slight difference there.

1 2 3 7

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site