Beleagured Libs need to go for broke as Barr ducks hospital questions

Ian Bushnell 16 August 2020 12
Peter McKay

Peter McKay’s endorsement was a disaster for the Canberra Liberals. Photo: Supplied.

A week is a long time in politics and the Canberra Liberals will be glad to put last week well behind them.

To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, to lose one candidate may be seen as bad luck but to lose two is just careless.

The party rolled out stalwart and 2016 candidate Peter McKay as a stopgap in Kurrajong after dumping Vijay Dubey, who had apparently gone off message to the point that an ultimatum had to be issued – quit or be disendorsed.

No sooner had the Libs put out a statement announcing Mr McKay was stepping into the breach than reports were surfacing that in 2018 the former army officer had written a darkly conservative treatise on religious freedom, possibly while humming Onward, Christian Soldiers, and submitted it to the Turnbull Government’s Expert Panel.

The publicly available document was soon doing the rounds of journalists and by the end of the day Liberals leader Alistair Coe had the solemn duty of ending Mr McKay’s political career, making a silk purse out of a sow’s ear by framing it as decisive action.

Mr Coe had little choice. Mr McKay’s views were even too extreme and out of touch for the socially awkward local Libs.

Chief Minister Andrew Barr, more out of sorrow than anger, but with obvious relish, painted Mr Coe’s team as a bunch of ultra-conservatives unfit for government in the socially progressive ACT.


READ ALSO: Coe concedes breakdown in Liberals’ vetting process after McKay dumped


Mr McKay’s views were regrettably mainstream in the Canberra Liberals, he said, shaking his head.

Oh such a gift, only a couple of months out from the election.

It is good that Mr Coe did act quickly, especially after all the work the party has put in to shake off the ultra-conservative label.

But the slipshod endorsement that bypassed the usual vetting process, probably due to Mr McKay’s previous selection, also betrays a lack of attention to detail that the Liberals unfortunately have shown in policy areas.

Mr Coe has rightly identified unease in the electorate about Labor’s health, housing and development directions but apart from some general policy statements on rates, taxes, cheaper housing and the headline-grabbing million trees, has offered scant detail about how the Liberals will go about things in government.

They continue to hedge their bets about light rail, allowing Mr Barr to characterise them as the party that just says no.

Liberal strategy has also often been bewildering, such as going after the government for its COVID-19 response, which has been advice-based and commendably cautious, especially in light of what has been happening in Victoria and NSW.

Time is running out, and after last week some wavering voters may have made up their minds. Remember, voting starts on 28 September.

Any ideas that the Liberals can be a small target and slip back into office because Labor has been in power too long and ‘it’s time’ is pure fantasy.

Mr Coe needs to start rolling out the big policies that everybody has been waiting for, or be crushed by the avalanche of announcements from a government keen to portray itself as the only one that can deliver the big projects and take Canberra into a new era as a mature city.

There is risk, but he and his team need to go for broke or by the time we get to 17 October it will be all over.

Nnew Emergency Department at Canberra Hospital

An artist’s impression of the new Emergency Department at Canberra Hospital. Will the expansion be big enough? Image: ACT Government.

Sometimes it seems that Mr Barr’s main opponent is a former chief minister who is doggedly pursuing the government for trashing his legacy, particularly when it comes to health.

Questioned by Region Media last week about Jon Stanhope’s relentless accusation that the government has cut health spending and is about to shortchange the Territory with the $500 million Canberra hospital expansion, Mr Barr played the man, saying the Labor hero was out of touch and that his assumptions were wrong, without going to the substance of the claims.


READ ALSO: Barr names builder for $500 million Canberra Hospital expansion


But he overstepped when he said previous projections about the hospital were now not valid because of COVID-19’s impact on migration and population growth.

To introduce current circumstances into a project that has been in the works for more than a decade is misleading and plainly nonsense.

It’s fine to reassess a project for financial reasons or because the need may not be as great as first seemed but the Labor Government has form for underestimating demand in health, such as the Centenary Hospital for Women and Children which is still having to catch up to Canberra’s growth.

Mr Barr is talking up his government’s infrastructure credentials and record in delivering projects, especially the popular first stage of light rail. He is spruiking public and social housing initiatives, although the government has been criticised for playing catch-up.

On the weekend the spectacular $36 million Stromlo Leisure Centre opened, an asset desperately needed in the Molonglo/Weston Creek area.

The government does have runs on the board.

Mr Barr has also played a measured hand guiding the ACT through the COVID crisis and has been a team player at National Cabinet, even during the recent NSW-Victoria border farce.

All the more reason for the Liberals to put some flesh on the policy bones it has thrown voters and get on the front foot instead of constantly responding to events.

It needs to make some headlines for the right reasons, quickly.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
12 Responses to Beleagured Libs need to go for broke as Barr ducks hospital questions
ChrisinTurner ChrisinTurner 12:06 pm 19 Aug 20

The Libs are still sitting on the fence over Light Rail Stage 2 despite the undisclosed enormous cost, undisclosed journey time to Woden(slower than the bus?), undisclosed design to cross the Lake (new bridge?) etc.

Mark Huppert Mark Huppert 7:54 pm 17 Aug 20

They have already shown their hand, over and over. If they could tear themselves away from the Abbott/Zed/Spud wing of the party I reckon they could easily win.

HiddenDragon HiddenDragon 7:49 pm 17 Aug 20

The brief outbreak of Wildean drollery has been a bit of fun in an otherwise dreary time, but Canberrans will eventually discover that Earnest is all very well, but the Importance of Being Solvent is what really matters – Oscar could have told them all about that.

Sol Sol 2:44 pm 17 Aug 20

Josh Manuatu should be sacked. And the Liberals purged of all these right wing extremists or spend another 24 years in opposition.

bj_ACT bj_ACT 1:01 pm 17 Aug 20

The ACT Liberals keep firing blanks even though ACT Labor keep giving them plenty of ammunition!

How can you make the bus system worse for almost half the city and yet the liberals can’t mount a coherent attack on the underlying network design problems.

How can Education performances decline in the outer suburbs and instead the Libs worry about the school chaplains scheme.

The health statistics for Canberra get worse and the Libs can’t focus on the core funding problem.

ACT Liberals are a hopeless opposition. Makes you wonder how they would be in Government.

Stephen Saunders Stephen Saunders 10:58 am 17 Aug 20

Then again, why not a late surge of inspired policy, at 11.59pm, the day before the ACT election. That could also work.

You can give it a good old go, as Shorten and Clinton did, and still end up losing. Or be a Coe or Albanese, and gratefully embrace runner-up status, without ever pretending to try to convince voters.

Joshua Nash Joshua Nash 8:30 am 17 Aug 20

Andrew Barre does not need to paint Liberals as conservative they do a very good job of being conservative without his help!

chewy14 chewy14 7:51 am 17 Aug 20

It’s laughable to think that the Liberals could “go big” with policy to win this election.

What exactly could they offer when the current government is already spending up big and the finances of the territory are so strained. There’s no way they could deliver without even further damaging our precarious position.

And seeing as though they want to freeze rates, this would make it even more difficult to come through with the goods.

The only thing they can really offer is “better management” and to constrain taxes and charges to residents somewhat but that’s almost certainly not going to beat this government despite how “on the nose” they are.

    t2owe t2owe 12:01 pm 17 Aug 20

    What exactly does the current ACT government offer Canberra citizens. Apart for irregular garbage collecitons I can’t think of anything. Coe needs ti tighten up his act, get proper policies out their before the elecitons and stop playing the ALP’s game with candidates when the ALP has nothing to crow about at all.

    chewy14 chewy14 1:21 pm 17 Aug 20

    https://apps.treasury.act.gov.au/budget/budget-2019-20/budget-papers

    T2owe,
    Perhaps you should acquaint yourself with the budget papers if you’re unable to think of a single thing the current ACT government offers Canberra citizens.

    Sol Sol 6:41 am 19 Aug 20

    What have the Canberra Liberals been doing for 20 years?? Too busy with branch stacking and the culture wars to do their actual job.

Acton Acton 7:30 am 17 Aug 20

To paraphrase William Shakespeare, the reasons for keeping Coe as leader are as two grains of wheat in two bushels of chaff: you seek all day to find them, and when you have them they are not worth the search.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top

Search across the site