12 January 2023

Griffith development off to ACAT: Community says ACTPLA's approach gave it no choice

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
MPG Griffith apartments

An artist’s impression of the Griffith apartment proposal. Photo: Guida Moseley Brown.

The ACT Planning Authority has been accused of being cavalier about objections to development proposals, giving a community group no choice but to appeal the approval of a multi-unit development in Griffith.

On Monday (9 January), the Kingston and Barton Residents Group lodged an application with the ACT Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal challenging ACTPLA’s decision before Christmas to conditionally approve Morris Property Group’s four-storey unit complex across three blocks on Leichhardt Street.

Since the 8 December decision, Morris has reduced the number of apartments from 76 to 67 and increased the setback on level 3, but the resident group’s main objections about the building height and south-facing balconies have been dismissed.

READ ALSO Lawson Build-to-Rent proposal aims for 500 dwellings on amenity-rich site

After a frustrating email exchange with ACTPLA in which most of his questions were ignored, president and retired planner Richard Johnston fired back that it left him no choice but to take the matter to ACAT.

“It gives me no pleasure to involve us all in this time and cost-consuming process, which I believe could have been avoided,” he wrote.

“I would also add that this sort of repeated and cavalier treatment of significant and contentious redevelopment proposals is hardly likely to improve the current low level of trust in the authority within the broader community.”

His comments come as the ACT Government planning reform program risks losing the confidence of the community with an Assembly committee report on the draft planning bill recommending almost 50 changes.

Render of proposed development

A front-on view of the proposed Griffith development. Photo: Guida Moseley Brown.

Mr Johnston also took issue with ACTPLA’s position on the Living Infrastructure changes to the Territory Plan in DV369, which took force last September and provides for adequate greenspace, including for trees.

ACTPLA argued that because the original DA was lodged well before September, the new rules did not apply, but Mr Johnston warned that two recent victories in ACAT may put that view in doubt.

Those cases involved Griffith Narrabundah Community Association’s objections to government supportive housing proposals seeking to put three units on one block.

In all three situations, substantial amendments were lodged after September, which Mr Johnston asserts exposes them to DV369.

“Frankly, I am sick of seeing the same platitudinous and totally inadequate ‘Reasons for the Decision’ from the Authority – ‘it was considered to meet the relevant rules and criteria of the Territory Plan’ – when it takes little study to demonstrate that this is far from the case,” Mr Johnston wrote.

Mr Johnston told Region that his group and others support development that complied with the Territory Plan, but developers were routinely putting in ambit claims to get more than what was permitted and the planning authority was routinely rolling over.

“They’re just not administering their own plan, and [Chief Planner] Ben Ponton has the hide to get up and say we’re getting poor outcomes because we’re bound by the rules, and the rules generate poorer quality outcomes than we can achieve if we’re left unfettered to look at it on the merits, but exactly the opposite is happening.”

READ ALSO Live a lavish lifestyle in this one-of-a-kind Parkes penthouse

The group had not intended to appeal, but it kept hitting a brick wall.

“It’s the only way to get a very transparent process,” he said.

Mr Johnston said he would be happy to go to mediation to resolve the issues.

He said the building height was contrary to the Territory Plan and what had been earlier approved in that area and should come back to three storeys.

“It is in an area where there is a mixture of development but generally two to three storeys and a bit of four but not much,” he said.

“It’s also opposite one of the heritage housing precincts – one-storey cottages – and so out of context it’s ridiculous.”

Mr Johnston was also concerned about the amenity for future residents because of the large number of south-facing apartments and balconies.

“That’s a recipe for a very poor outcome for future residents,” he said.

The amount of green space and tree coverage in line with DV 369 would also be raised.

Kingston Geocon proposal

The Kingston proposal from Geocon. Photo: Turco and Associates.

The Morris case will also run alongside a new appeal against the second approval of the Geocon proposal in Giles Street, which started as an eight-storey mixed-use development but was scaled back to a four-storey commercial project after a community outcry.

But that was still knocked back in ACAT. Mr Johnston said the only difference in the new version was a lease change leaving the issues raised by the community still unresolved.

These included the building height, streetscape, heritage aspects, and the impact on neighbours’ amenity.

The all-new appeal will kick off with a hearing in early February.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
carl francia5:06 pm 13 Jan 23

This seems like a reasonable development that should be allowed to be built. We’ve got to stop heritage listing every single thing in this city and focus on actually building enough homes for people. So-called “community consultation” often seems to just be a way for wealthy landowners to dictate how other people live – which feels like feudalism rather than democracy!

Good luck to you. Living in Campbell, we got exactly the same ‘its fine’ response from ACTPLA in respect of the multiple 7 storey apartments blocks in the C5 development in the predominantly single level suburb of Campbell.

Property Developer – greed personified

They used to be called speculators, which is what they do. The ‘developer’ term is double-speak, a bit like killing people is called ‘pacification’.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.