Liberals unveil plan to help ease Canberra’s ongoing rental crisis

Ian Bushnell 7 February 2021 29
Mark Parton

Canberra Liberals’ Mark Parton wants more government support for community housing providers. Photo: Dominic Giannini.

The soaring cost of renting a home in Canberra needs a multi-pronged response from government that involves community housing providers (CHPs), according to the Canberra Liberals, who have released a list of actions that they say should be investigated.

It comes as community housing provider Havelock House met with Planning and Land Management Minister Mick Gentleman about proposals to boost affordable housing supply in the ACT, beyond the government’s current Housing Strategy.

Housing spokesperson Mark Parton said the ball was in the Labor-Greens Government’s court to fix the ACT’s rental crisis.

“Canberra has become the country’s most expensive rental market under Labor and the Greens, and the reality is that many families are seriously struggling with massive price hikes,” Mr Parton said.

“Recent CoreLogic data shows median house rents are now $657 per week while unit rents are $473 per week. That’s a hell of a lot for families with stretched incomes to contend with.”

In a motion to the Legislative Assembly next week, the Canberra Liberals will call on the Labor-Greens Government to investigate a range of options involving more support for CHPs.

They say the government should investigate shared equity arrangements, and where the government provides land for CHPs to provide housing while maintaining an ownership stake.

It should also look at rent supplementation lease arrangements – where the government would undertake bulk auctions of long-term leases to CHPs.

The Liberals say the supplement would provide an incentive for institutional investment partnerships with CHPs.

It is urging the immediate extension of lease durations currently let out to CHPs by Housing ACT, to give long-term certainty for CHPs to borrow and grow.

The Liberals also say the government should consider more extensive land tax exemptions and rates rebates for landholders leasing to CHPs, and investigate a NSW-style land tax threshold where the tax is only paid on the value of the land over a certain amount.

The government should also reassess the current land release regime to determine whether supply is meeting demand.

Mr Parton said the government was all talk on rental affordability.

“That is why today the Canberra Liberals are calling for the investigation of a number of solutions, many involving community housing providers, that the government should seriously consider adopting, to help make life easier for Canberra families dealing with prohibitive rents,” he said.

Mr Parton said the government needed to embrace new policy ideas, especially with regards to how CHPs can be part of the affordable housing solution for struggling renting families.

“The Canberra Liberals are putting these ideas forward in good faith, and I now challenge the Labor-Greens Government to take them on board and consider them as part of their policy mix going forward in 2021,” Mr Parton said.

Havelock Housing is also calling on the government to consider such policies and briefed Mr Gentleman on Thursday.

It has proposed the government offer direct capital or land grants to community housing organisations at no charge, or at least at concessional rates, as done in NSW and Victoria.

It also believes Lease Variation Charge concessions could be provided to local builders/developers who partner with a community housing organisation.

Havelock sees more options in the tax system, such as a 50 per cent discount on rates for landlords taking up the government’s Land Tax Exemption scheme who commit to a three-year lease, to entice more participants.

Rates exemptions for community housing providers would also help them deliver a more affordable product, it says.

On new land, Havelock says not enough of the 15 per cent land allocated generally to affordable and/or social housing in new estates is being taken up and is urging the government to do more, including specifically nominating what blocks are for, whether that be for people with a disability or social or affordable housing.

It also wants the government to negotiate with developers of large englobo estates (land that is undeveloped, largely unserviced or has minimal development) for a percentage of housing that includes a mixture of community and affordable housing managed by CHPs.

A spokesperson for Housing Minister Yvette Berry said the government looked forward to receiving the details of the motion being proposed by Mr Parton.

“A number of the suggestions are already under consideration or are underway through the ACT Housing Strategy,” the spokesperson said.

“The government will work through the details of this motion through the ACT Assembly.”


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
29 Responses to Liberals unveil plan to help ease Canberra’s ongoing rental crisis
Ol L Ol L 1:14 pm 01 Mar 21

You can make money renting property in Canberra but only if you can negatively gear. Without that there is minimal return annually on the rental income given the value of the asset- only growth in the properties value when you eventually sell it. Of course there’s also CGT on that as well.
Overall I cannot see why I would invest in the ACT properly market when across the border in NSW returns are so much better as there’s little in the way of land taxes.

    Capital Retro Capital Retro 5:11 pm 01 Mar 21

    Negative gearing is a very popular hobby for many overpaid public servants.

Julie Macklin Julie Macklin 4:30 pm 09 Feb 21

The old hostel system was good for young singles and couples without children. Although when I stayed at Hotel Acton hostel, there were some families staying there.The lawns down to the lake would have given a place for children to play. Maybe hostels should be reintroduced to take some pressure of rental properties.

Rob Taglienti Rob Taglienti 2:52 pm 09 Feb 21

Being new to Canberra you notice a few things straight away. Enormous amounts of vacant land and very few blocks for sale. Those that are for sale are for sale at highly inflated prices The cost developing a block wouldn’t be more than 100k. I see the government selling the blocks for over 3 times that. Without knowing more about the procedures and history it looks like Mafia racketeering to someone looking in from the outside….

    rossau rossau 9:16 pm 11 Feb 21

    Oh, we’re a captive audience.
    And those whom we should trust are not shy of being the frist to make a profit from us.

Tramcar Trev Tramcar Trev 8:41 am 09 Feb 21

The real issue is that there is a minimal return from social housing. What investor wants to have to pay the increased insurance costs levied because of the increased risks to the property while getting a minimal return?

David Malcolm David Malcolm 5:28 pm 08 Feb 21

Incoming lefty whinging about the Libs policy, even though labor has been in power for 20 years and have created the current situation.

    Andrew Shaun Andrew Shaun 8:31 pm 08 Feb 21

    David Malcolm this policy is the outcome of the socialist, progressive Canberra constituents consistently voting for incompetence.

    Ross Burdon Ross Burdon 9:18 pm 11 Feb 21

    This is not a localised phenomenon. Both left- and right-leaning states have fallen victim to the prosperity model of growth.

Steve Ulr Steve Ulr 4:58 pm 08 Feb 21

Sounds like trying to effectively outsource something to me. But maybe I’m reading it wrong.

    Mark Parton Mark Parton 8:08 pm 08 Feb 21

    Steve Ulr We have a much smaller level of social housing through Community Housing Providers than in most other cities. I’m just trying to find cost effective ways to deliver more affordable and social housing to the people who need it.

Sally Tregellas Wodzinska Sally Tregellas Wodzinska 3:51 pm 08 Feb 21

If we had more community focussed assembly, not a partisan one, all 3 parties could sit down together and nut this out together. Labor 10, Liberal 9, Greens 6. That might even things out a bit.

Brenton Higgins Brenton Higgins 3:01 pm 08 Feb 21

Canberra Liberals Policy: don't be poor.

    James Dohm James Dohm 5:29 pm 08 Feb 21

    Brenton Higgins yup up there with get a better paying job

    Brenton Higgins Brenton Higgins 6:17 pm 08 Feb 21

    Isn't it funny how they wait till after the election to propose this stuff...

    Half of it is what already happening anyway... me thinks Parto (mark parton) is lining up for a leadership run....

    Mark Parton Mark Parton 8:06 pm 08 Feb 21

    Brenton Higgins The vast majority of these measures were announced as election policy and were roundly endorsed by ACTCOSS, ACT Shelter and the Community Housing sector.

    Brenton Higgins Brenton Higgins 10:20 pm 08 Feb 21

    Mark Parton So you aren't unveiling just reannouncing?

    Sean Bishop Sean Bishop 11:50 pm 08 Feb 21

    Brenton following through by sounds of it

    Mark Parton Mark Parton 5:53 am 09 Feb 21

    Brenton Higgins No, I’m formally moving it as a motion in the chamber.

    Nathan Burraston Nathan Burraston 9:04 am 09 Feb 21

    Brenton Higgins that's Labors policy, evidenced by being in their 21st year of power. They engineered this crisis.

    Deborah Gale Deborah Gale 10:51 am 09 Feb 21

    Brenton Higgins So what is Labors policy after 21 years of government? 'We are sorry you're poor but we aren't going to help you? Oh and all the community housing? Well, we're going to sell to developers to build appartments that you won't be able to afford to rent. But we care'

keek keek 1:03 pm 08 Feb 21

The only thing that Labor and the Greens have done for rental affordability in the last 20 years is to make it much worse, year after year. Between stupid legislation and ever increasing land rates, it just never ends.

On the up side to this, the people most impacted by this are largely the ones that vote for Labor and the Greens. So, you get what you deserve.

If you believe they are about to change anything, I have some magic beans you may be interested in purchasing.

    JC JC 4:40 am 09 Feb 21

    Oddly enough the ones most impacted are likely to vote Liberals.

    The labor base has shifted significantly in the past 20 years. Most noticeable at a federal level. Labor seems to attract more of the not so poor and the not so wealthy, which in Canberra makes up a large amount of the population hence the return of Labor with the help of the greens who also do well in Canberra.

    bj_ACT bj_ACT 1:18 pm 09 Feb 21

    I think you’re right JC. It’s a weird mix Canberra politics! The Libs have been raising a number of concerns around housing, health, education and public transport that clearly effect the people who are worse off in the city.

    I support Canberra Libs for these social concerns, but I couldn’t vote for them when they have these other loony ultra conservative views that don’t align with Canberra voters.

    ACT Liberal voting base is rich inner south residents and the people in the suburbs who feel ignored by the ACT Labor and Greens alliance.

    Barr and Rattenbury talk up support for the working poor but continue to support those who win them elections.

    keek keek 2:17 pm 09 Feb 21

    I dunno about that. About every lower income person I know vote Labor religiously, because they listen to the nonsense that the Liberals only look after the wealthy and Labor look out for the less fortunate. In the ACT, that is clearly not the case. Not exactly a surprise that large swathes of people are ignorant of the actual policies driven by the people they vote for though.

Alan Rose Alan Rose 12:25 pm 08 Feb 21

The government keeps putting up the price of rates and then charges land tax if you rent out your property, perhaps they can give the owners a break on the rates and land tax so they could lower the rents.

    Justin Watson Justin Watson 2:23 pm 08 Feb 21

    Alan Rose Its tax deductible! Also land tax is to STOP people from buying a property and leaving it vacant. Turns out the tax deductions and having no tennants means you can still do alright. Where there is no land tax, properties sit vacant because they can afford to do so.

    Brenton Higgins Brenton Higgins 3:00 pm 08 Feb 21

    HAHAHAH an owner won't pass on the rent drop if they get a discount on land tax. simple.

    Alan Hopkins Alan Hopkins 7:29 pm 10 Feb 21

    sorry mate - you have no understanding of economics. Rents wouldn't intially change - just landlords would make more money, which would increase the demand by investors for rental properties, which would increase the demand for housing in turn pushing up prices, forcing more potential home owners to rent, which would lead higher rents........

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

 Top
Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site