Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Daily flights from Canberra
to Singapore and the world

168 in a 90 zone gets a solid fine!

By johnboy 27 December 2012 31

A 36-year-old Pearce man was caught driving 78km/h over the speed limit on (Monday 24 December) in what ACT Police has described as an act of stupidity.

The driver was detected travelling at 168km/h in a 90km/h zone on William Hovell Drive, Belconnen. He was issued with a $1,811 fine and lost 12 demerit points which will result in the loss of his license.

Acting Traffic Operations Superintendent Rod Anderson would like to remind the public double demerit points are in effect until Tuesday (1 January 2013) and police are on the road across the ACT enforcing the road rules.

“After all the recent efforts of ACT Policing in relation to road safety it is disappointing to apprehend a motorist travelling 78km/h over the posted speed limit. Speeding is one of the major contributing factors in serious and fatal collisions in Canberra,” Superintendent Rod Anderson said.

“ACT Policing wants a fatality and crash free holiday period and incidents like this have the potential to make the holiday period an unhappy time for a family, after losing a loved one due to excessive speeding and dangerous driving.”

“We want all motorists in Canberra to seriously consider their and others’ safety as they continue to drive around the Territory.”

ACT Policing is currently joining forces with NSW Police Monaro Local Area Command in support of Operation Crossroads, the fourth in an ongoing series of coordinated road safety initiatives to reduce road trauma across Australia and New Zealand.

Operation Crossroads began on Sunday, December 23 and will continue until January 3, 2013.

Double demerits will apply for speeding and seatbelt offences, with an extra point for all other traffic offences. Double demerit points will be effective from Friday, December 21 until midnight January 1, 2013.

[Courtesy ACT Policing]

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
31 Responses to
168 in a 90 zone gets a solid fine!
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd 6:37 pm 03 Jan 13

Solidarity said :

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd said :

Solidarity said :

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd said :

Doing these sort of speeds should qualify to be charged with attempted murder, seeing as if you hit a pedestrian, cyclist or even another car, they are dead.

And at 80km/h, the speed limit on that road, if you hit a pedestrian, cyclist, or even another car, you have a high possibility of killing all those people as well. Attempted murder only works if you… y’know, attempt to murder someone, not just drive down a road a bit quickly.

Close to 200 kms is far from going a bit quickly…

Not really, happens much more often than you may think.

What exactly are you saying?

Solidarity 3:41 pm 03 Jan 13

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd said :

Solidarity said :

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd said :

Doing these sort of speeds should qualify to be charged with attempted murder, seeing as if you hit a pedestrian, cyclist or even another car, they are dead.

And at 80km/h, the speed limit on that road, if you hit a pedestrian, cyclist, or even another car, you have a high possibility of killing all those people as well. Attempted murder only works if you… y’know, attempt to murder someone, not just drive down a road a bit quickly.

Close to 200 kms is far from going a bit quickly…

Not really, happens much more often than you may think.

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd 3:26 pm 03 Jan 13

Pork Hunt said :

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd said :

Doing these sort of speeds should qualify to be charged with attempted murder, seeing as if you hit a pedestrian, cyclist or even another car, they are dead.

Attempted murder of whom?

Whoever else is on the road at the same time.

Pork Hunt 7:23 pm 02 Jan 13

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd said :

Doing these sort of speeds should qualify to be charged with attempted murder, seeing as if you hit a pedestrian, cyclist or even another car, they are dead.

Attempted murder of whom?

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd 5:25 pm 02 Jan 13

Solidarity said :

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd said :

Doing these sort of speeds should qualify to be charged with attempted murder, seeing as if you hit a pedestrian, cyclist or even another car, they are dead.

And at 80km/h, the speed limit on that road, if you hit a pedestrian, cyclist, or even another car, you have a high possibility of killing all those people as well. Attempted murder only works if you… y’know, attempt to murder someone, not just drive down a road a bit quickly.

Close to 200 kms is far from going a bit quickly…

Solidarity 9:44 am 02 Jan 13

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd said :

Doing these sort of speeds should qualify to be charged with attempted murder, seeing as if you hit a pedestrian, cyclist or even another car, they are dead.

And at 80km/h, the speed limit on that road, if you hit a pedestrian, cyclist, or even another car, you have a high possibility of killing all those people as well. Attempted murder only works if you… y’know, attempt to murder someone, not just drive down a road a bit quickly.

Spykler 6:08 pm 31 Dec 12

Ben_Dover said :

goggles13 said :

on what basis is a jail term justified?

Reckless endangerment of others lives.

Six months at the Hume Hilton should be his reward.

Like this winner received..

http://www.smh.com.au/news/business/the-bentley-defence/2005/06/23/1119321850987.html#

OpenYourMind 4:04 pm 31 Dec 12

And for a visual demonstration of 200km/h into a wall: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dI5ewOmHPQ

gazket 3:56 pm 31 Dec 12

http://the-riotact.com/australian-federal-police-officer-escapes-traffic-fine-traffic-was-light/28860

1337Hax0r said :

How is it that people can do those speeds and not be put in jail? Okay, 10 km/h over the limit = fine, 20 over limit = fine plus suspension. 30over the limit should equal suspension and community service. 40+ over the limit should equal permanent loss of license and jail time. Especially if it is a second offense. 78 km over the limit should have equaled immediate imprisonment with a speedy trial followed by a lengthy prison sentence.

but unfortunately there are rules for some and different rules for others . notice how Police has described as an act of stupidity if the public are caught but ok to be let of with a warning if its a off duty police officer
http://the-riotact.com/australian-federal-police-officer-escapes-traffic-fine-traffic-was-light/28860

chewy14 11:18 am 31 Dec 12

c_c™ said :

To put it another way, if he slammed into a car coming in the other direction, that would make an impact speed of 260km/h… or the same as getting hit by a Blackhawk at cruise. No one would walk away, and on some stretched of that road, it wouldn’t take much of miscalculation to do it.

Idiot.

Here’s a nice explanation of the forces based on that mythbusters episode:

http://scienceblogs.com/dotphysics/2010/05/06/mythbusters-energy-explanation/

buzz819 10:59 pm 30 Dec 12

c_c™ said :

To put it another way, if he slammed into a car coming in the other direction, that would make an impact speed of 260km/h… or the same as getting hit by a Blackhawk at cruise. No one would walk away, and on some stretched of that road, it wouldn’t take much of miscalculation to do it.

Idiot.

No not really, both cars would act as an immovable object, cancelling out the others speed. Yes there would be a lot of kinetic energy to dissipate but the maximum velocity of the collision would be 168km/h. The force on the people in the car travelling at high speed will be the same no matter if they hit a wall or another car.

No one would walk away, but no point making wild scientific statements with no basis.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site