Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Opinion

Canberra insurance broker
of choice since 1985

Inner south crowd spurn ALP, Greens

By Charlotte Harper - 28 September 2016 26

Liberal and Canberra Community Voters candidates

If the crowd at the Inner South Canberra Community Council’s election forum tonight is representative of Canberra voting intentions generally, both Labor and the Greens are in BIG trouble.*

There will be no light rail in Canberra after the election, not over the dead bodies of many of these voters.**

The Safe Schools program will be banished, never to be mentioned again. Ditto the acronym LGBTQI, which left several attendees looking confused when dropped into the conversation by Greens candidate Rebecca Vassarotti.

Crowd

Rates will be frozen for two years, then capped in line with CPI.***

There will be no development at Manuka Oval at all. Unsolicited proposals will be banned.

Politicians will keep in touch with voters by spending their weekends and evenings door-knocking beyond the campaign, nay, in perpetuity.****

Independent, Labor, Greens and minor party candidates.

Independent candidate Marea Fatseas, who is clearly something of a heroine in this particular community, will be Chief Minister as a compromise between the two major parties in the Assembly: the Liberals and the Canberra Community Voters group.

Wow. Until this moment, I had believed the experts who have been telling me for months that candidates from the major parties and Greens were the only ones with a chance of being elected.

Now I’m not so sure. If ever there were a room full of people who seemed as though they might think 15 years was long enough for one mob to be in government, this was it. If ever there were a room full of voters who were cynical about the major parties, I’d found it. If ever there were a room full of voters who were ready to embrace alternatives if it might mean relief from rising rates and the “horrors” of a light rail network, I was sitting in it.

You could almost hear them all (yes, all) making a mental note to refer back to come election day when Mike Hettinger of Canberra Community Voters advised them that the only way to be sure of getting independent candidates up was to leave the boxes next to Labor, Liberals and Greens blank and number only the boxes for the minor party representatives and independents.

I have no doubt that readers (and political candidates and their minders) will take one look at the photograph here and dismiss this crowd as “old” and “out of touch”.

I can’t argue with the former given one major plus about the whole event was how youthful I felt in their presence.

But out of touch? These are residents who regularly attend community meetings, read newspapers and listen to the radio. They contribute substantially to the Territory’s revenue each year through their high rates (yes, calculated on land value of the inner south blocks on which they live, but high from their perspective in the context of the retirement incomes from which they must be paid). These are voters who have genuine concerns that have not been addressed successfully by the Barr Government to date.

The wars over Manuka Oval, the Yarralumla Brickworks and MOCCA/Telopea Park School tennis courts are in the past (for the moment, at least), but new battlegrounds emerge constantly, with the matter of a six-storey hotel directly opposite Forrest Primary among those mentioned last night.

These are the issues that have mobilised this crowd, this time, but you get the feeling many of these electors have been mobilised before. They probably voted against self-government or for the Residents Rally at the first Legislative Assembly election in 1989. Have they been this angry and anti-establishment since? I doubt it.

Will their vote have an impact in the seat of Kurrajong next month? Sure. Ms Fatseas is shaping up to be the most successful of all independent candidates running at this election. Will it be enough to see her win office? I doubt it.

* Both Greens candidate Rebecca Vassarotti and Labor candidate Rachel Stevens-Smith spoke calmly and rationally about the cost of light rail, but were shouted down by those in the audience who deemed their statements to be outright lies.
** Independent candidate Peter Robinson promised at one point that though he was anti-tram, he would not go so far as to throw himself under one, Anna Karenina-style, if the light rail went ahead.
*** Canberra Community Voters candidate Lucinda Spier is making the rates issue her own, harking back to her days as founder of the Canberra Rates Association late last century. Ms Spier is also focused on government transparency.
Her husband is registered as a lobbyist in the ACT Legislative Assembly on behalf of clients including the Superbarn group and Australian Hotels Association. Ms Spier’s name also appears on that listing, as a company director, but she is not a lobbyist herself as earlier reported here.
**** One Liberal candidate, Brooke Curtin (as in the suburb, as she reminded us three times) claims she stopped counting doors upon which she has knocked in recent months at 7000. There were nods of acknowledgement at her commitment level around the room.

Frankly, we were also impressed. Come to think of it, this whole exercise was impressive. It made me feel very fortunate to live in a city in which so many are engaged with our democratic processes.

Speaking of which, departing felt a little like arriving at a polling booth. Supporters of Ms Fatseas were waiting at the main exit with copies of the independent candidate’s flyer and a photocopy of an anti-light rail article. I took copies of each then stepped outside the room, only to stumble upon this:

Marea Fatseas

The major parties were nowhere to be seen.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
26 Responses to
Inner south crowd spurn ALP, Greens
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Aragornerama 1:22 pm 16 Oct 16

So it turns out this crowd was thoroughly unrepresentative. No way, who’d a thunk it?

Acton 6:51 pm 07 Oct 16

Charlotte Harper said :

Deref said :

“The Safe Schools program will be banished, never to be mentioned again. Ditto the acronym LGBTQI”

My oh my – what an ignorant homophobic rant.

It’s great if they’re abandoning Labor and the Greens – as long as they don’t replace them with Liberals or, far worse, the Rise Up candidates (running as independents) or the (even more) extreme right Liberal Democrats.

I just wanted to make it clear that no one came out with an “ignorant homophobic rant”. I based my assessment of the crowd’s views on Safe Schools and awareness of the acronym LGBQTI entirely on observation of their murmurings, body posture and facial expressions.

Why are you only referring to LGBTQI?

What happened to the ‘A’s in LGBTQIA?

Are you denying their existence? Erasing diversity? Failing to show inclusiveness?

This is linguistic genocide.

FYI the full correct acronym is now: LGBTQQIP2SAA

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/06/27/entire-lgbt-acronym_n_10616392.html

Murmurings, body postures and facial expressions follow….

    Charlotte Harper 8:36 pm 08 Oct 16

    It is indeed likely there would have been further baffled glances between attendees around the room had the candidates referred to LGBTQQIP2SAA.

John Moulis 4:48 pm 06 Oct 16

Charlotte Harper said :

Deref said :

“The Safe Schools program will be banished, never to be mentioned again. Ditto the acronym LGBTQI”

My oh my – what an ignorant homophobic rant.

It’s great if they’re abandoning Labor and the Greens – as long as they don’t replace them with Liberals or, far worse, the Rise Up candidates (running as independents) or the (even more) extreme right Liberal Democrats.

I just wanted to make it clear that no one came out with an “ignorant homophobic rant”. I based my assessment of the crowd’s views on Safe Schools and awareness of the acronym LGBQTI entirely on observation of their murmurings, body posture and facial expressions.

Charlotte, you should familiarise yourself with the various factions in the gay movement before making blanket statements about Safe Schools and the LGBTQI acronym. There is a more conservative wing of the gay movement – most notably the bears – who are in many cases aggressively male who don’t support concepts such as “gender fluidity” as taught by Safe Schools. Many also don’t identify with the LGBTQI label either and prefer to use the word gay as the generic term.

    Charlotte Harper 5:03 pm 07 Oct 16

    @John Moulis, I simply observed that the attendees at this event appeared to be opposed to the Safe Schools program and appeared not to be familiar with the term LGBTQI. I think you too are misunderstanding my column here.

Matt Donnelly 10:44 am 06 Oct 16

Deref said :

It’s great if they’re abandoning Labor and the Greens – as long as they don’t replace them with Liberals or, far worse, the Rise Up candidates (running as independents) or the (even more) extreme right Liberal Democrats.

Deref, the ACT Liberal Democrats is not an extreme right-wing party. I appreciate that the Lib Dems’ philosophy may confuse those who apply left and right labels to political ideologies. For instance, legalisation of marijuana for personal use or support for gay marriage is often regarded as left-wing, while reducing taxes and govt involvement in our lives may be regarded as right-wing.

I encourage you to visit our website, check out our policies, and see for yourself what the ACT Liberal Democrats offer in relation to education, health, public housing and transport for Canberrans. We have seventeen candidates running in this election, including three in the inner south (Kurrajong). I am one of five Lib Dems candidates for Brindabella. http://act-ldp.org.au/Policies.html

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site