13 July 2022

Privacy out the window as Meriton rises centimetres from Park Avenue apartments

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
72
Meriton building

The Meriton building almost adjoins the Park Avenue apartments in Allara Street. Photos: Paul Robards.

It’s a tight squeeze on Allara Street but residents of the new Park Avenue apartments didn’t realise how up close and personal their new neighbour, Canberra’s first Meriton hotel, would be.

There is but 10 centimetres between Park Avenue and the Meriton now under construction. Balconies almost touch and bedrooms are only metres away from Meriton rooms.

Then there is the communal kitchen that is now enclosed on three sides and where a balcony view is a wall of concrete.

READ ALSO Historic West Block to be restored as offices in $12 million upgrade plus public cafe

Apartment owner Paul Robards, who lives on Level 15, believes something has gone wrong in the development approval process for this to happen, and the residents’ complaints have fallen on deaf ears.

He and his fellow directly affected residents, about 26 all up, aren’t anti-development and knew the risks of buying into a city apartment block.

They expected other buildings to rise around them but also that residents’ privacy would be protected.

“Something new that goes in should not be designed in a manner that intrudes on the privacy of existing residents. It needs to consider that properly,” Mr Robards says.

The problem was that when the Meriton DA was lodged in March last year, the Park Avenue owners were yet to move in and were not notified so they could comment.

Mr Robards believes the Park Avenue developer, Morris Property Group, and the planning authority, should have notified buyers even if they had not moved in.

It was a real failing and deeply flawed consultation process, he says.

“You’d have to be tracking the media or driving past and see something on a billboard,” he says.

The Park Avenue communal kitchen on Level 4. A wall is now only centimetres from the glass balcony.

The directly affected residents are on levels 4 to 17, but about 180 people live in the Park Avenue development.

Mr Robards says they have chosen to settle in the city and be part of its transformation from a dreary place that people mainly came to for work to a vibrant city centre that is now home to large numbers of people.

The Meriton will be 16-level building housing a hotel and short-term rental suites.

“We are horrified to find out that the approval allows for gross infringement of our security and privacy,” Mr Robards says.

“Over the last few months, through various submissions, we have clearly demonstrated the impacts and sought to have the design amended, not to stop the development but to protect our security and privacy. These attempts have all been unsuccessful.”

Mr Robards says the issue is not with Meriton, which has largely followed the processes put in place by the ACT Government.

READ ALSO Government demands new school builder have women contractors, all-female management

Residents met with Chief Minister Andrew Barr last November and have made representations to Planning Minister Mick Gentleman, but their response is that it’s a matter for the planning authority.

But Mr Robards says planning officials, apart from being surprised at the situation, have yet to respond.

At the very minimum, residents want Meriton to install privacy screens on their balconies so guests don’t look into the Park Avenue apartments.

Mr Robards says the Park Avenue experience shows that the government needs to get planning right in the city if it wants people to live there.

“If the ACT government wants to achieve vibrancy in the city and build a sense of community, then it must ensure that legislation enables this vision,” he says.

“It must also set a higher bar for how large developers operate and behave.

“I am keen for development in the city … but you’ve got to do it so it’s sympathetic to those living there.”

Meriton building

It’s a tight fit on Allara Street. Parke Avenue residents say it’s a gross infringement of their security and privacy.

President of the ACT Chapter of the Australian Institute of Architects Jane Cassidy would not comment on the individual case but said the ACT needed an apartment design guide and for the role of the National Capital Design Review Panel to be beefed up.

“To get a good quality compact city, we do need the planning reforms being undertaken,” Ms Cassidy said.

“We do need to empower the panel within the new planning system so their recommendations are able to take effect to ensure we get really good design outcomes that consider the current occupants as well as the future residents.”

Ms Cassidy said other states such as NSW and Victoria had apartment design guides which helped to “frame the qualities that we all expect when we’re purchasing an apartment off the plan and what we expect for the life of that building”.

She said a good guide usually referred to quality outdoor space on balconies, natural light and ventilation in living areas and bedrooms, and privacy.

“We would like to see a guide as part of the suite of documents coming through from the ACT Government’s planning reforms,” Ms Cassidy said.

READ ALSO Torrens dual occupancy shows planning system continues to disappoint

An ACT Planning and Land Authority spokesperson said the assessment for the Meriton proposal did not identify the need for additional privacy, but if the lessees agree to further privacy screens, this could be considered as an amendment to the DA.

The spokesperson said potential impacts on neighbours and adjoining developments were considered in the assessment and through representations received.

All known neighbouring lessees of a development application are notified, and notifications are issued on the planning website, the DA finder app and with signage on the site.

The Meriton development required a planning study to be lodged to address the design matters, as well as being referred to the Design Review Panel for advice.

The spokesperson said the new planning system, which would include a new Territory Plan and introduce District Strategies, would ensure that the impact of growth and change on social and physical infrastructure could be managed in a way that made Canberra more liveable.

“The new planning system will also allow development assessment to consider cumulative impacts, which is not currently a tool available to development assessors,” the spokesperson said.

Join the conversation

72
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
Latest

According to the picture in this story, the Meriton was built first! https://the-riotact.com/canberras-first-meriton-building-on-way-with-final-da-lodged/448895

Town planning in the ACT has become a joke. There is no planning.

Shan Weereratne2:40 pm 15 Jul 22

So many concrete structures down Northbourne Avenue in it’s original raw prefabricated form, not even a lick of paint. Shame on you ACT planning for neglecting your duties.

Ashley Ruiter9:18 pm 14 Jul 22

The lack of privacy is just part of this whole Meriton issue. The lowered natural light in living quarters and home offices of Park Ave was apparently not regarded as an important enough issue, though now in 2022, working from home is the norm in many sectors. Not being given a fighting chance to commemt on or contest the plans (owners were kept in the dark; this was not by accident) is extremely disappointing to owners and residents alike, and frankly, is unacceptable.

It’s incomprehensible that planning laws would allow the security and privacy of the City’s residents to be affected in such a manner.

SigmaOctantis10:31 pm 13 Jul 22

This is the least of the problems civic has.

Oh the poor Yuppies… its called Karma 🙂

If NSW and Victoria have apartment design guides, why doesn’t the ACT??

If the ACT Planning and Land Authority says that “potential impacts on neighbours and adjoining developments were considered in the assessment”, I’d hate to see what happens when they are asleep at the wheel!

Mirela Stjelja7:25 pm 13 Jul 22

This is very inconsiderate and unfair.We appeal for something to be done asap to address this issue.

Laura Carter6:58 pm 13 Jul 22

Building high rises that close raises not only issues of privacy but also potential structural integrity as mentioned in the other comment.

Also sad to see the beautiful city of Canberra suffer from a lack of considered planning and due care to new owners. It doesn’t reflect the vision of community and vibrancy and takes all that progress back a step. I hope all efforts go towards a resolution.

HiddenDragon6:57 pm 13 Jul 22

Termites know to keep space between their mounds – they clearly have a better planning system than Canberra, but this development does sound like good news for cat burglars –

“Balconies almost touch and bedrooms are only metres away from Meriton rooms.”

Capital Retro5:31 pm 13 Jul 22

“vibrant city centre”

What a load of crap.

Is your house called the “vibrant city centre”? If so, I agree with your comment……

FrankieFearlessPS5:02 pm 13 Jul 22

OMG that kitchen balcony image is a shocker. Good old labor government – for the people, buy the people. (No typo Ken)

Defined to be energy efficient. Traps in the warm in winter and provides shade in summer.

One should really look at the case of Champaign towers in Miami
One building was built too close to another and undermined the foundations of the original building.

Packing the sardine can’s this close can be trouble if not done correctly

The Planning Authority did not contact the new owners. There is no record from any of the affected residents so unless the the ACT Planning Authority can produce any evidence of such correspondence then I would say that there is clear evidence of failure in process and care here

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.