The Amazing Auto-Fellating Canberra Liberals

lostinbias said :

Sorry. Half drunk and following elections. I’m bound to take everything literally!

Only half drunk? Have another shandy! (-:

poetix said :

lostinbias said :

poetix said :

Ah, essential pillars. Just can’t do without them can you? Although some disreputable types would even graffiti essential pillars with their ‘tags’ while playing their ‘hip-hop’ and wearing their ‘hoodies’ and so on…Hoodlums.

Do we have to rip on hip-hop now too? What about (some) hip-hop’s relation to street poetry? There’s a lot of innovation going on underground.
…

Um, I wasn’t criticising hip-hop. I was, in fact, laughing at those who use cliche (like essential pillars) without any thought. Shame I didn’t work the word ‘boom-box’ in there…The inverted commas are sometimes a clue as to how to read a comment, I find.

Sorry. Half drunk and following elections. I’m bound to take everything literally!

lostinbias said :

poetix said :

Ah, essential pillars. Just can’t do without them can you? Although some disreputable types would even graffiti essential pillars with their ‘tags’ while playing their ‘hip-hop’ and wearing their ‘hoodies’ and so on…Hoodlums.

Do we have to rip on hip-hop now too? What about (some) hip-hop’s relation to street poetry? There’s a lot of innovation going on underground.
…

Um, I wasn’t criticising hip-hop. I was, in fact, laughing at those who use cliche (like essential pillars) without any thought. Shame I didn’t work the word ‘boom-box’ in there…The inverted commas are sometimes a clue as to how to read a comment, I find.

poetix said :

Ah, essential pillars. Just can’t do without them can you? Although some disreputable types would even graffiti essential pillars with their ‘tags’ while playing their ‘hip-hop’ and wearing their ‘hoodies’ and so on…Hoodlums.

Do we have to rip on hip-hop now too? What about (some) hip-hop’s relation to street poetry? There’s a lot of innovation going on underground.

But back on topic, Canberra Liberals will have to become a lot more small-l if they want to succeed in Canberra. At the moment I can only name one of their candidates who meets this description.

Ah, essential pillars. Just can’t do without them can you? Although some disreputable types would even graffiti essential pillars with their ‘tags’ while playing their ‘hip-hop’ and wearing their ‘hoodies’ and so on…Hoodlums.

Seven years old and it could have been written yesterday. (Except for who is in the Lodge, of course. For the moment, anyway.)

Fun thread. Thanks for the massive spade work, CSRI.

Puggy Pearson said :

The IR changes, like the fury that supposedly would have gotten rid of the GST, will be forgotten next time an election rolls around.

Zombie thread and all, but this was a top prediction 🙂

Now, now Colsim….still smarting from the smacking you got re Standope and the Catholic church?

We all know how reliable polls are. Just like the one’s that predicted Latham as victor last time at the Federal level. The IR changes, like the fury that supposedly would have gotten rid of the GST, will be forgotten next time an election rolls around. Especially since the increasingly irrelevant union movement can think of nothing more constructive that having a rally and a fat, bearded man chants ‘Howard is an asshole’. Mind bogglingly imaginative

Young Lib? Sorry again, too old for that game. Not a member of any party. My vote goes to who I think is best at the time and is not party preferred.

Seems like every time you pop your smart head up it gets smacked down again

Ooh, a new young lib playa on this board, great.
(what’s the emoticon for vomiting?)

Would that silent majority supporting IR change be the same one that would’ve elected a Beazley gov’t with an 8% swing on the weekend? (And that’s a Beazley gov’t for God’s sake)

CT you’re right (sadly), IR in two years I doubt many will care.

My complaint is a party whose president lists its “essential pillars” as ways to retain power.

You haven’t addressed that, nor have you come to your dishonesty in saying I had taken her statement out of context when I did no such thing,

Another 4 year term…..they have already.

Lets just say that the silent majority of this nation support IR reform and strenghtned CT laws and leave it at that eh?

Sorry, I forgot to add ‘grow up a bit’ to the argument